Forensic dentistry methods to estimate the chronological age of individuals: a topic review

Authors

  • Catalina Pilar Ugalde-Barahona Universidad Mayor de Santiago de Chile
  • José Manuel Olivares Universidad Mayor de Chile
  • Ernesto González-Mallea Universidad Mayor de Chile
  • Gustavo Moncada-Cortés Universidad Mayor de Chile
  • Osmir B. De Oliveira-Junior Universidade Estadual Paulista

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v29n1a9

Keywords:

Forensic dentistry, Determining age by teeth, Dental eruption, Forensic anthropology

Abstract


Introduction: global mobilization has created new needs. From sporting events to criminal matters, determining the chronological age of individuals is being used by forensic surgeons worldwide. The objective of the present study was to analyze the forensic methods to estimate the age of individuals, including the advantages and limitations of these methods. Method: a search was conducted in the Sistema de Bibliotecas de la Universidad Mayor (SIBUM): Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source, ClinicalKey, and Science Direct Freedom Collection, selecting papers published from 1980 to 2014. A manual search was also conducted, including specific journals and texts in this field, with no limitation as to the year of publication. The inclusion criteria were research projects aimed at determining the chronological age of individuals through forensic analysis of oral tissues. All published texts in a language other than English were excluded. In total, 70 publications were analyzed. Technological advances have paved the way for the study of new parameters; however, the original ones identified by Gustafson in 1950 are still studied. Conclusions: most studied methods are invasive in some degree. In addition, none of these techniques is accurate in its own; therefore, the combination of different measurement techniques is recommended, opening a field of research on techniques that are less invasive and can be a complement to the existing ones. Finally, the available information lead to conclude that research on populations of African and Asian descent is lacking, which is a current challenge because of globalization, migration, and the heterogeneity of current populations.

|Abstract
= 299 veces | PDF
= 249 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Catalina Pilar Ugalde-Barahona, Universidad Mayor de Santiago de Chile

DDS. School of Sciences, Universidad Mayor de Chile, Santiago de Chile

José Manuel Olivares, Universidad Mayor de Chile

DDS, School of Sciences, Universidad Mayor de Chile, Santiago de Chile

Ernesto González-Mallea, Universidad Mayor de Chile

DDS, School of Sciences, Universidad Mayor de Chile, Santiago de Chile

Gustavo Moncada-Cortés, Universidad Mayor de Chile

DDS, PhD, School of Sciences, Universidad Mayor de Chile, Santiago de Chile

Osmir B. De Oliveira-Junior, Universidade Estadual Paulista

DDS, MSc, PhD, School of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araraquara, Brazil

References

Pittayapat P, Jacobs R, De-Valck E, Vandermeulen D, Willems G. Forensic odontology in the disaster victim identification process. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012; 30(1): 1-12.

Lewis JM, Senn DR. Dental age estimation utilizing third molar development: A review of principles, methods, and population studies used in the United States. Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 201(1-3): 79-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.042

Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G. Forensic age diagnostics of living people undergoing criminal proceedings. Forensic Sci Int. 2004; 144(2-3): 243-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.059

Solheim T, Vonen A. Dental age estimation, quality assurance and age estimation of asylum seekers in Norway. Forensic Sci Int. 2006; 159 (Suppl 1): S56-S60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.016

Da-Silva RD, da Silva MAD, de Oliveira OB, Melo ACM, de Oliveira RN. Dental fluorescence: potential forensic use. Forensic Sci Int. 2013; 231(1-3): 167-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.05.001

Ritz-Timme S, Rochholz G, Schütz HW, Collins MJ, Waite ER, Cattaneo C et al. Quality assurance in age estimation based on aspartic acid racemisation. Int J Legal Med. 2000; 114(1-2): 83-86.

Matsumoto H, Kitamura S, Araki T. Autofluorescence in human dentine in relation to age, tooth type and temperature measured by nanosecond time-resolved fluorescence microscopy. Arch Oral Biol. 1999; 44(4): 309-318.

Senn DR, Weems RA. Manual of forensic odontology. 5ed. Boca Ratón, Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b13744

Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973; 45(2): 211-227.

Solheim T. A new method for dental age estimation in adults. Forensic Sci Int. 1993; 59(2): 137-147.

Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Solheim T. Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int. 1995; 74(3): 175-185.

Kvaal S, Solheim T. A non-destructive dental method for age estimation. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1994; 12(1): 6-11.

Gustafson G. Age determination on teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1950; 41(1): 45-54.

Karkhanis S, Mack P, Franklin D. Age estimation standards for a Western Australian population using the dental age estimation technique developed by Kvaal et al. Forensic Sci Int. 2014; 235: 104.e1-104.e6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.008

Duarte-da-Silva R, Duarte-da-Silva MA, Yumi-Uezono A, Borges-Braga-dos-Santos-Queiroz S, Nogueira-deOliveira R. Estimating age of Brazilians using the methods of Demirjian and Nicodemo, Moraes and Médici: a comparative analysis. Forensic Med Anat Res. 2013; 1(3): 57-62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/fmar.2013.13011

Raut DL, Mody R. Radiographic evaluation of cervical vertebrae, carpal metacarpal bones and mandibular third, molar during adolescence and in young adults. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2006; 18(1): 24-29.

Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M. Precision and reliability of pulp/tooth area ratio (RA) of second molar as indicator of adult age. J Forensic Sci. 2004; 49(6): 1319- 1323.

Mincer HH, Harris EF, Berryman HE. The A.B.F.O. study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age. J Forensic Sci. 1993; 38(2): 379-390.

Lucy D, Pollard AM. Further comments on the estimation of error associated with the Gustafson dental age estimation method. J Forensic Sci. 1995; 40(2): 222-227.

Smith BG, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J. 1984; 156(12): 435-438.

Stott GG, Sis RF, Levy BM. Cemental annulation as an age criterion in forensic dentistry. J Dent Res. 1982; 61(6): 814-817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610063401

Wittwer-Backofen U, Gampe J, Vaupel JW. Tooth cementum annulation for age estimation: results from a large known-age validation study. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004; 123(2): 119-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10303

Drusini A, Calliari I, Volpe A. Root dentine transparency: age determination of human teeth using computerized densitometric analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991; 85(1): 25-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330850105

Waite ER, Collins MJ, Ritz-Timme S, Schutz HW, Cattaneo C, Borrman HI. A review of the methodological aspects of aspartic acid racemization analysis for use in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int. 1999; 103(2): 113-124.

Spalding KL, Buchholz BA, Bergman LE, Druid H, Frisén J. Forensics: age written in teeth by nuclear tests. Nature. 2005; 437(7057): 333-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/437333a

Downloads

Published

2017-12-15

How to Cite

Ugalde-Barahona, C. P., Olivares, J. M., González-Mallea, E., Moncada-Cortés, G., & De Oliveira-Junior, O. B. (2017). Forensic dentistry methods to estimate the chronological age of individuals: a topic review. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 29(1), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v29n1a9
w

Most read articles by the same author(s)