Removable partial dentures: eliminating retainers in the anterior zone

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v32n1a3

Keywords:

Dental esthetics, Metallic elements, Retention, Prosthetic displacement, Visibility

Abstract

Introduction: one of the main factors for discomfort in users of removable partial prosthesis is the presence of visible retainers in the anterior zone. In Kennedy Class III arches, that is, exclusively dental loading channels (in which the functional forces reach their final receptor: the alveolar bone), anterior zone retainers may be eliminated by selecting an appropriate prosthetic insertion and removal axis, and mainly by carving guiding planes that should provide retention by mechanical rubbing. This is an in vitro experimental study aimed at proving the hypothesis that it is possible to obtain functional retention in a removable partial prosthesis of dental loading channel without using retainers in the anterior zone. Methods: 7 maxillary models with different types of toothless process were used. As a common characteristic, they all were classified as Kennedy Class III with partial denture arches. A Cr-Co metallic base was built for each model according to their clinical situation. Their design allowed them to be exposed to traction in a universal traction machine (Tinius Olsen H5K-S). Results: the proposed hypothesis was confirmed as expected. The traction force needed to displace the metallic bases with retainers in the anterior zone was 16.93 Newton in average. On the other hand, the metallic bases without retainers in the anterior zone showed an average of 12.84 N. The average values obtained for both groups are higher than those reported in the literature (4.903 N). Conclusions: in Class III removable partial dentures it is possible to use metallic bases with no retainers in the anterior zone.

|Abstract
= 1136 veces | TABLAS (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces| | FIGURAS (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces| | PDF
= 511 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Christian Eugenio Rochefort-Quiroz, Universidad de Chile

Specialist in Oral Rehabilitation. Universidad de Chile

Constanza González, Isapre Fundación

Specialist in Periodontics. Isapre Fundación

Danilo Ocaranza, Universidad de Chile

M. Ed., Universidad de Chile

Diego Andrés Muñoz-Rivera, Universidad de Chile

DDS. Assistant in the Prosthesis Department. School of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile

References

Bezzon O, Mattos M, Rivero R. Surveying removable partial dentures: the importance of guiding planes and path of insertion for stability. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78(4): 412- 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70051-9

Soo S, Leung T. Hidden clasps versus C clasps and I bars: A comparison of retention. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75(6): 622- 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90247-4

Sato Y. Clinical methods for adjusting retention force of cast clasps. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82(5): 557- 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70054-5

Santana Penín U, Mora MJ. An esthetically attractive twin- flex clasp for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80(3): 367- 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70142-8

De Rossi A, Albuquerque RF, Bezzon OL. Esthetic options for the fabrication of removable partial dentures: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86(5): 465- 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119678

Carreiro Ada F, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Santana IL, Vergani CE. Dual path: a concept to improve the esthetic replacement of missing anterior teeth with a removable partial denture. J of Prosthodontics. 2008; 17(7): 586- 90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00332.x

Ali M, Waters NE, Nairn RI, West F, Sherriff M. A laboratory investigation of the role of guide planes in the retention of cast cobalt- chromium alloy partial denture frameworks. J Dent. 2001; 29(4): 291-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00016-1

Kim D, Park C, Yi Y, Cho L. Comparison of cast Ti- Ni alloy clasp retention with conventional removable partial denture clasps. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91(4): 374- 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.015

Aziz Mahmoud A, Wakabayashi N, Takahashi H. Prediction of permanent deformation in cast clasps for denture prostheses using a validated nonlinear finite element model. Dental Materials. 2007; 23(3): 317- 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.012

Rivera Cerdas A. Efecto de la preparación del esmalte, en la fuerza de adhesión de dientes con Fluorosis. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2013; (15): 69-74.

Romo F, Contreras C. Medición in vitro de distintos tipos de retenedores. Rev. Soc. Prótesis Estomatológica. 1988; (4): 39- 43.

Sato Y, Hosokawa R. Proximal plate in conventional circumferential cast clasp retention. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83(3): 319- 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70135-1

Kippax AJ, Shore RC, Basker RM. Preparation of guide planes using a reciprocating handpiece. Br Dent J. 1996; 180: 216- 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809030

Ahmad J, Sheriff C, Waters NE. The effect of reducing the number of clasps on removable partial denture retention. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68(6): 928- 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90553-m

Ma PS, Brudvik JS. Managing the maxillary partially edentulous patient with extensive anterior tooth loss and advanced periodontal disease using a removable partial denture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100(4): 259- 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60203-6

Ayuso-Montero R, Martori López E, Brufau de Barberá M, Ribera Uribe M. Prótesis removible en el paciente geriátrico. Av Odontoestomatol. 2015; 31(3): 191-201. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S0213-12852015000300009

Downloads

Published

2020-06-11

How to Cite

Rochefort-Quiroz, C. E., González, C., Ocaranza, D., & Muñoz-Rivera, D. A. (2020). Removable partial dentures: eliminating retainers in the anterior zone. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 32(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v32n1a3