Radiographic evaluation of alveolar ridge augmentation with non resorbable hydroxyapatite alloplastic grafts: nine months follow up

Authors

  • Félix Antonio Gil-Cárdenas Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.2276

Keywords:

Pre prosthetic surgery, Alveolar ridge augmentation, Atrophic alveolar ridge, ydroxyapatite, Bio materials

Abstract

Introduction: the purpose of this study was to determine radiographically the percentage of stability of alveolar ridge height in the maxilla and the mandible in patients subjected to pre prosthetic surgery of ridge augmentation with non resorbable HA implants. Methods: the study was performed in 15 patients in whom reproducible measurements were taken. For the maxilla: (A) From Anterior Nasal Spine; (B right and left) from the lowest border of the nasal fossae; (C right and left) from the lowest border of the orbit. For the mandible: (E) from the lowest border of the mandible passing through symphysis; (F right and left) passing through the mental foramen; (G right and left) passing 5 mm posterior to the mental foramen; (H right and left) passing 10 mm posterior to mental foramen. All measurements were performed before surgery, immediately after and, nine months after surgery. Results: the different points of the maxilla were averaged (PPMXS) and a height loss between 6.29% and 33.6% was observed, with an average of 17.36%. For the mandible (PPMXL) variations ranging from 6.31% of augmentation to 18.8% loss were observed, with an average of 2.54%. Conclusions: HA implants allow reestablishment of adequate alveolar ridge height. The alveolar ridge height initially obtained presents a decrease percentage in height for the maxilla of 17.36% and 2.54% for the mandible after nine months follow up.

|Abstract
= 252 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 83 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Félix Antonio Gil-Cárdenas, Universidad de Antioquia

Odontólogo, especialista en Estomatología, Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial, profesor asistente, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Antioquia.

References

Bay RA. The pathophysiology and anatomy of edentulous bone loss. En: Fonseca R, Davis W. Editores. Reconstructive preprosthetic oral and maxillofacial surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1985.

Mercier P, Bellavance F, Cholewa J, Djokovic S. Long-term stability of atrophic ridge reconstructed with hydroxylapatite: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 960-968.

Mercier P, Huang H, Cholewa J, Djokovic S. A comparative study of the efficacy and morbidity of five techniques for ridge augmentation of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 50: 210-217.

Kent JN, Jarcho M. Ridge augmentation procedures with hydroxylapatite. En: Fonseca R, Davis W. Editores. Reconstructive preprosthetic oral and maxillofac surgery. 2.a ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995.

Kent JN, Quinn JH, Zide MF, Guerra LR, Boyne P. Alveolar ridge augmentation using nonresorbable hydroxylapatite with or without autogenous cancelous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983; 41:629-642.

Kent JN, Finger IM, Quinn JH, Guerra LR. Hydroxylapatite alveolar ridge reconstruction: clinical experiences, complications and technical modifications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 44:37-49.

Holmes RE, Hagler HK. Porous hydroxylapatite as a bone graft substitute in mandibular contour augmentation: a histometric study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45: 421-429

El Deeb M, Tompach PC, Morstad AT, Kwon P. Long-term follow-up of the use of nonporous hydroxylapatite for augmentation of alveolar ridge. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49: 257-261.

Baker RD, Terry BC, Davis WH. Long-term results of alveolar ridge augmentation. J Oral Surg 1979; 37:486-489.

Davis WH. Long term ridge augmentation with rib grafts. J Maxillofac Surg 1975; 3:103-106.

Fazili M. Follow-up investigation of reconstruction of the alveolar process of the atrophic mandible. Int J Oral Surg 1978; 7:400-404.

Fonseca RJ. Revascularization and healing of onlay particulate autologous bone grafts in primates. J Oral Surg 1980; 38:572-577.

Kelly JF, Friedlaender GE. Preprosthetic bone graft augmentation with allogenic bone: A preliminary report. J Oral Surg 1977; 35:268-275.

Meijer HJ, Steen WH, Bosman F, Wittkampf AR. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular augmentation with prefabricated hydroxylapatite/fibrin glue implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55:138-144.

Peterson LJ. Augmentation of the mandibular residual ridge by a modified visor osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983; 41:332-338.

Stoelinga PJ, de Koomen HA, Tideman H, Huijbers TJ. A reappraisal of the interposed bone graft augmentation of the atrophic mandible. J Maxillofac Surg 1983; 11:107-112.

Mehlisch DR, Leider AS, Roberts WE. Histologic evaluation of the bone/graft interface after mandibular augmentation with hydroxylapatite. Oral Surg 1990; 70:685-692.

Mercier P, Bellavance F. Low incidence of severe adverse effects after mandibular ridge reconstruction using hydroxylapatite. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28:273-278.

Satow S, Slagter AP, Stoelinga PJ, Habets LL. Interposed bone graft to accommodate endosteal implants for retaining mandibular overdentures: A 1-7 year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26:358-364.

Echeverría P, Roldán M. Rehabilitación del paciente edentado. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia; 1997.

Block MS, Kent JN. Long term radiographic evaluation of hydroxylapatite augmentation of deficient mandibular alveolar ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 42:793-796.

Barsan RE, Kent JN. Hydroxylapatite reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiency with an open mucosal flap. Oral Surg 1985; 59:113-119.

Published

2009-09-21

How to Cite

Gil-Cárdenas, F. A. (2009). Radiographic evaluation of alveolar ridge augmentation with non resorbable hydroxyapatite alloplastic grafts: nine months follow up. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 20(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.2276