Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial isolates from dogs in a veterinary diagnostic laboratory in Colombia between two consecutive four-year periods

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.e355005

Keywords:

antibiotics, antibiogram, antimicrobial resistance, antibiotic resistant bacteria, dogs, E. coli, multidrug resistance, multi-resistance, Staphylococcus spp., susceptibility

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the increase in multi-drug-resistant bacteria are among the most important threats to human and veterinary medicine, according to the World Health Organization. Objective: To compare the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in bacterial isolates from dogs over two consecutive four-year periods. Methods: The Animal Microbiology Laboratory database of the Agrarian Sciences Faculty at the University of Antioquia (Medellín, Colombia) was searched for routine canine submissions in which culture and antibiograms were performed. Results: A total of 1,146 samples were submitted between 2020 and August 2023 for culture and susceptibility testing, from which 805 (70.2%) isolates were recovered. Of these 805 isolates, susceptibility testing was performed on 799 samples. A significant decrease in susceptibility between 2016-2019 and 2020-August 2023 was noted in dog isolates for some antimicrobials: Escherichia coli to amoxicillin-clavulanate (66.7-53.1%; p<0.01) and ampicillin (67.7-58%; p<0.05), Enterobacteriaceae to amikacin (100-94.3%; p<0.01), ampicillin (61.8-45.7%; p<0.01), and trimethoprim-sulfadiazine (83.9-75.6%; p<0.05), Staphylococcus pseudointermedius to gentamicin (63.9-52.5%; p<0.01), trimethoprim-sulfadiazine (57-50%; p<0.05), and doxycycline (60.9-43.4%; p<0.01). Significantly increased susceptibilities were also noted in E. coli to enrofloxacin (69.2-78.7%; p<0.05) and doxycycline (68.7-76.2%; p=0.0745) and in Enterobacteriaceae to enrofloxacin (64.4-79.3%; p<0.01), and doxycycline (38.7-47.7%; p=0.06). For all bacterial isolates, an increasing resistance trend was observed for amoxicillin-clavulanate. All Staphylococcus species showed low resistance to amikacin (<10%); moderate resistance (10-20%) to amoxicillin-clavulanate, cephalexin, cefovecin, and enrofloxacin; high resistance (20-50%) to ampicillin, gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, and clindamycin; and very high resistance (50-70%) to doxycycline. For other bacterial families, the number of antimicrobials with high (20-50%) or very high (50-70%) resistance rates was: Enterobacteriaceae (7/9), Enterococcus spp. (4/7), E. coli (10/12), and Streptococcus spp. (4/6). For urinary tract infections caused by E. coli or Enterobacteriaceae (Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp.), amikacin and gentamicin were the only drugs that demonstrated low (<10%) in vitro resistance. Multidrug resistance slightly increased from 2016-2019 (18.7%; 247/1,316) to 2020-August 2023 (19.7%; 150/761). decrease in susceptibility rather than an increase in resistance (28 vs. 20). Conclusion: High resistance rates highlight the need for continued surveillance and reinforce the importance of antibiograms to guide clinical decisions.

|Abstract
= 303 veces | PDF
= 192 veces| | EPUB
= 12 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

María Isabel García-Álvarez, Universidad de Antioquia

Grupo de Investigación Centro de Investigaciones Básicas y Aplicadas en Veterinaria (CIBAV), Universidad de Antioquia

David Villar, Universidad de Antioquia

Grupo de Investigación Centro de Investigaciones Básicas y Aplicadas en Veterinaria (CIBAV), Universidad de Antioquia

Sara López-Osorio, Universidad de Antioquia

Grupo de Investigación Centro de Investigaciones Básicas y Aplicadas en Veterinaria (CIBAV), Universidad de Antioquia

David A Gómez-Beltrán, AGROSAVIA

Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (AGROSAVIA), Colombia

Jenny J Chaparro-Gutiérrez, Universidad de Antioquia

Grupo de Investigación Centro de Investigaciones Básicas y Aplicadas en Veterinaria (CIBAV), Universidad de Antioquia

References

Awosile B, McClure JT, Saab ME, Heider LC. Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from cats and dogs from the Atlantic Provinces, Canada from 1994–2013. Can Vet J. 2018;59(8):885–893. PMCID: PMC6049328.

Authier S, Paquette D, Labrecque O, Messier S. Comparison of susceptibility to antimicrobials of bacterial isolates from companion animals in a veterinary diagnostic laboratory in Canada between 2 time points 10 years apart. Can Vet J. 2006;47(8):774–778. PMC1524832.

Ben Salah I, Makni F, Cheikhrouhou F, Neji F, Sellami H, Ayadi A. Malassezia species: Pathology, isolation and identification media. J Mycol Med. 2010;20(1):53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2009.11.006

Biemer JJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1973;3(2):135–140. http://www.annclinlabsci.org/content/3/2/135.full.pdf

Bourély C, Cazeau G, Jarrige N, Leblond A, Madec J, Haenni M, Gay E. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacteria isolated from dogs with otitis. Epidemiol Infect. 2019;147:1-10. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268818003278

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Dick and Dilutions Susceptibility Test for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, 4th ed.; CLSI Supplement Vet08; CLSI: Wayne, NY, USA, 2018. https://clsi.org/standards-development/

Conner JG, Smith J, Erol E, Locke S, Phillips E, Carter CN, Odoi A. Temporal trends and predictors of antimicrobial resistance among Staphylococcus spp. isolated from canine specimens submitted to a diagnostic laboratory. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0200719. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200719

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) and ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control). EU Summary Report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2013. EFSA J. 2015;13(2):4036.

https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4036

Gandolfi-Decristophoris P, Schüpbach-Regula G, Petrini O, Zinsstag J, Schelling E. Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of multi-drug resistant Staphylococci in healthy cats and dogs. J Vet Sci. 2013;14(4):449–456. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2013.14.4.449

Guaguère E, Prélaud P. Étude rétrospective de 54 cas de dermite à Malassezia pachydermatis chez le chien: Résultats épidémiologiques, cliniques, cytologiques et histopathologiques. Prat. Med. Chir. Anim. Comp. 1996;31(4):309-323. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19971200183

Guillot J, Bond R. Malassezia Yeasts in Veterinary Dermatology: An Updated Overview. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:79. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00079

Gómez-Beltrán DA, Villar D, Lopez-Osorio S, Ferguson D, Monsalve LK, Chaparro-Gutierrez J. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial isolates from dogs and cats in a Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory in Colombia from 2016-2019. Vet Sci. 2020;7(4):173. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7040173

Gómez-Beltrán DA, Schaeffer DJ, Ferguson DC, Monsalve LK, Villar D. Antimicrobial prescribing practices in dogs and cats by Colombian veterinarians in the city of Medellin. Vet Sci. 2021;8(5):73. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci8050073

Lee GY, Lee HH, Hwang SY, Hong J, Lyoo KS, Yang SJ. Carriage of Staphylococcus schleiferi from canine otitis externa: Antimicrobial resistance profiles and virulence factors associated with skin infection. J Vet Sci. 2019;20(2):e6. DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e6

Lord J, Millis N, Jones RD, Johnson B, Kania SA, Odoi A. Patterns of antimicrobial, multidrug and methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus spp. isolated from canine specimens submitted to a diagnostic laboratory in Tennessee, USA: a descriptive study. BMC Vet Res. 2022;18(1):91. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-022-03185-9

Ludwig C, de Jong A, Moyaert H, El Garch F, Janes R, Klein U, Morrissey I, Thiry J, Youala M. Antimicrobial susceptibility monitoring of dermatological bacterial pathogens isolated from diseased dogs and cats across Europe (ComPath results). J Appl Microbiol. 2016;121(5):1254-1267. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27593360/

Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268-281. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x

Mauldin EA, Scott DW, Miller WH, Smith CA. Malassezia dermatitis in the dog: a retrospective histopathological and immunopathological study of 86 cases (1990-95). Vet Dermatol. 1997;8(3):191-202. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3164.1997.d01-15.x

Penna B, Varges R, Martins GM, Martins RR, Lilenbaum W. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from canine pyoderma in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2009;40(3):490-494. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24031392/

Schmidt VM, Williams NJ, Pinchbeck G, Corless C, Shaw S, McEwan N, Dawson S, Nuttall T. Antimicrobial resistance and characterisation of staphylococci isolated from healthy Labrador retrievers in the United Kingdom. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-17

Thungrat K, Price SB, Carpenter DM, Boothe DM. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of clinical Escherichia coli isolates from dogs and cats in the United States: January 2008 through January 2013. Vet Microbiol. 2015;179(3-4):287-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.06.012

Weese JS, Blondeau J, Boothe D, Guardabassi LG, Gumley N, Papich M, Jessen LR, Lappin M, Rankin S, Westropp JL, Sykes J. International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases (ISCAID) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of bacterial urinary tract infections in dogs and cats. Vet J. 2019;247:8-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.02.008

Downloads

Published

2025-02-10

How to Cite

García-Álvarez, M. I., Villar, D., López-Osorio, S., Gómez-Beltrán, D. A., & Chaparro-Gutiérrez, J. J. (2025). Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial isolates from dogs in a veterinary diagnostic laboratory in Colombia between two consecutive four-year periods. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 38(3), e355005. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.e355005

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)