The Legitimation in the cause and its application in the simulation action filed by permanent partners in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.14148Keywords:
Legitimation on the cause, procedural budgets, materialAbstract
A suitable legal-procedural relation to utter a judicial decision over a discussion matter composes of formal and substantial requirements this allows a juridical acts consistent with a legal forms. Those requirements called Procedural Budgets it’s composed in turn by procedural budgets and material budgets. The doctrine has been called the legitimation in the cause in the material budgets, after understand that concerns to the claim or substantial law. However, this is not accord with the effects of the inexistence in the result of a demand, generating two slopes: one who indicates that absence prevents to make a background study of the object of the litigation, in consequence, there is no place to determine the existence and/or the ownership of the pretended right and other estimates who has direct influence in the sense of the decision, that means, if the background decision results condemnatory or rejection. In concrete terms, the Supreme Court of Justice has been indicated, that the lack of legitimation of the person who unsaturated the juridical action results in to reject the pretention. This has triggered in the processes that looks for the simulation demonstration of juridical acts requires of some certainty levels on the right ownership, inevitably affected by the existence of the simulated act.
Downloads
References
Agudelo Ramírez, M. (s.f.). Los presupuestos procesales. Recuperado el 17 de mayo de 2011, del sitio web http://enj.org/portal/biblioteca/penal/fundamentacion_de_recursos/23.pdf.
Canosa Torrado, F. (1993). Las excepciones previas y lo impedimentos procesales. (1a ed.). Santa Fé de Bogotá D.C.: Ediciones Doctrina y Ley.
Carnelutti, F. (1959). Instituciones del Proceso Civil, Volumen I. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Jurídicas Europa.-América.
Chiovenda, G. (1922). Principios de Derecho Procesal Civil, Tomo I. Madrid: Reus.
Couture. E. J. (2001). Estudios, ensayos y lecciones de derecho procesal civil. Vol. 2. México: Editorial jurídica libertad.
Devis Echandía, H. (1966). Nociones generales del derecho procesal civil. Madrid: Aguilar.
Devis Echandía, H. (s.f.). Compendio de derecho procesal. Teoría general del proceso. Tomo I. Bogotá: Dupré Editores.
Fairén Guillén, V. (1992). Teoría general del derecho procesal. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Morales Molina, H. (1965). Curso de derecho procesal civil. (5a ed.). Bogotá: Lerner.
Morales Molina, H. (1973). Curso de derecho procesal civil. (6a ed.). Bogotá: Editorial ABC
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Estudios de Derecho is governed by the following regulation: Political Constitution of Colombia, article 61; Law 23 of 1982, articles 1 and 2; Law 44 of 1993, chapter II, article 6 and chapter IV, article 51; Law 599 of 2000 through which the Penal Code is issued, articles 270, 271 and 272. In addition, the journal is governed by the guidelines of the National Copyright Directorate and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for Colombia. Finally, it abides by Rectoral Resolution 21231 of 5 August, 2005, through which the Statute on Intellectual Property is issued.
Authors who publish in Estudios de Derecho continue to retain their rights, however, they should bear in mind that the contents of the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike license. In this sense, The material created may be distributed, copied and exhibited by third parties if they credit it. No commercial benefit can be obtained.
