The access to differential justice the situation of the population in a vulnerable situation at cali.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.18410Keywords:
justice access, justice administration, differential approach, judicial oversight, vulnerable groups, legal practitioners representingAbstract
International and Colombian case law have set the content of the right to access to judicial systems in a constitutional state of law such as Colombia. This content includes the due process of law and the guarantee of equal access to an independent tribunal or court without obstacles based on discriminatory practices that might extend the legal process beyond a reasonable term. As part of its task of defending the rights of vulnerable populations, the Human Rights Clinic of the Universidad Icesi, GAPI,worked on a case of a group of legal practitioners representing a poor population that faced discrimination against in their access to local judicial authorities. The GAPI established vigilance on the local judicial system in order to determine both structural and subjective causes of the discriminatory practices. This vigilance was undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the Law 850 of 2003. In doing so the clinic designed the instruments for collecting information, which allowed us to undertake exploratory research about the way that cultural factors—including practices, beliefs and values—become barriers to the proper functioning of the judicial system. This article shows the results of this case and describes the cultural factors that make access to judiciary system difficult for clients, making it slower and untrustworthy. Based on these findings, the authors make recommendations intended to rectify the identified problem.
Downloads
References
Acosta Alvarado, P.A. (2007). El derecho de acceso a la justicia en la jurisprudencia interamericana. Bogotá: Colección Temas de derecho Público No. 77., pp. 43
Argemiro, A. (2009). Herramientas para la formulación y negociación del presupuesto público en el sector justicia colombiano 1993 – 2008. Bogotá.
Cesar, J., Cifuentes, A. y Solano, J.A. (2003). Nuevas evidencias de la crisis caleña. Revista Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, 089, 43-55.
Birgin, H. y Kohen, B. (2006). El Acceso a la Justicia como derecho. En Acceso a la justicia como garantía de igualdad. Instituciones, actores y experiencias comparadas. (15 y ss) Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Buendía García, P. (2010). Presupuesto de inversión en Colombia: Sector Justicia. En IV Seminario de Gestión Judicial. La inversión en justicia. (151 y ss). Chile: CEJA.
Bustamente, A. y Cabezón, A. (2009). Reporte de la Justicia, Cuarta edición 2008- 2009. Chile: CEJA. Disponible en: www.ceja.cl/
Cáceres Tovar, V.M., Chacón Triana, N.M., Gómez Carmona, W. y Huertas Díaz, O. (2005). Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos. Doctrina y Jurisprudencia. 1980 – 2005. Bogotá: Grupo Editorial IBAÑEZ.
Cerrillo, A. (2007). Las tecnologías de la información y el conocimiento al servicio de la justicia iberoamericana en el siglo XXI. E-Justicia (monográfico en línea), IPD, Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política. Universitat de Oberta de Catalunya. Chamorro, B.F. (1994). La tutela judicial efectiva. Barcelona: Casa editorial.
República de Colombia. Ministerio de Hacienda (2006). Marco de Gasto de Mediano Plazo 2007-2010. Colombia
Secretaría Corte Interamericana Derechos Humanos. (2010). Documentos básicos en materia de Derechos Humanos en el Sistema Interamericano. San José de Costa Rica: Editorial Corte Interamericana Derechos Humanos. Notas de prensa
Murcia, L. (2008). “Atentado al Palacio de Justicia de Cali”. Revista Semana .
Urrego R., (2012, Junio 22). “Reforma a la Justicia: el paso a paso de una irresponsabilidad”. Revista Semana.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Estudios de Derecho is governed by the following regulation: Political Constitution of Colombia, article 61; Law 23 of 1982, articles 1 and 2; Law 44 of 1993, chapter II, article 6 and chapter IV, article 51; Law 599 of 2000 through which the Penal Code is issued, articles 270, 271 and 272. In addition, the journal is governed by the guidelines of the National Copyright Directorate and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for Colombia. Finally, it abides by Rectoral Resolution 21231 of 5 August, 2005, through which the Statute on Intellectual Property is issued.
Authors who publish in Estudios de Derecho continue to retain their rights, however, they should bear in mind that the contents of the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike license. In this sense, The material created may be distributed, copied and exhibited by third parties if they credit it. No commercial benefit can be obtained.