Three sentences of the constitutional court. Or how easy it is journalistic veracity and how light the honor of the individual s

Abstract

The brief constitutes a critical commentary of three recent sentences of the Spanish Constitutional Court, the three related to conflicts between dignity right and freedom of information. It is criticized the Metaphysical tone of certain expressions that serve to pretend the finding oflegal truths where all that exist are hypothesis, perfectly legitimate, but mere hypothesis, but not objective and demonstrable truths. But it also pretends to stand out that in this type of cases the resource to the deliberation has more of rhetorical artifice than authentic decision-making method, because, in spite ofthe appearances, the Court does not deliver anything besides delimits in an interpretative way rules, like in any type of cases in witch any type oflegal norm is applied.