Review of contractual obligations in the Civil Code of Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.v76n167a06

Keywords:

Legal basis, self-organization, alienation, legal transaction, circumstance, Civil Code, Ukraine

Abstract

Breaching of contractual obligations may lead to certain negative consequences. Hence, this work analyzes the theoretical aspects of termination of contractual obligations in Ukraine’s civil law. The article aims to study the obligation termination mechanism by determining the legal framework for its functioning. The author focuses on one of the forms of contractual obligation termination, more specifically, the start of cancellation and deferred status of a legal transaction. Using normative and protective functions in legislation, the author plans to determine specifics of legal facts of normative compensatory nature. It is established, that the condition for cancellation of a legal transaction, can be a direct or reverse mechanism for the termination of contractual obligations. A condition for cancellation of a legal transaction can be applied to the whole transaction or to its separate parts.

|Abstract
= 289 veces | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 30 veces| | PDF
= 260 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anatoliy V. Kostruba, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

Doctor in Law, associate Professor,Professor of the Departament of Civil Law, Vasyl Stefanyf Precarpathian  National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukranie.  

References

Bennett, T.B., Friedman, B., Martin, A.D., Smelcer, S.N. (2018). Divide & Concur: Separate Opinions & Legal Change. Cornell Law Review, 103(4), 817-878.

Calabresi, S.G. (2015). The unknown achievements of Justice Scalia. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 39(3), 575-578. Retrieved from http://harvardjlpp.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/39_3_Calabresi_F.pdf

Chilton, A.S., Versteeg, M. (2018). Courts’ Limited Ability to Protect Constitutional Rights. University of Chicago Law Review, 859(293), 293-335.

Civil Code of Ukraine. (2003). Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15

Code civil. (2017). Retrieved from https://constitutions.ru/?p=416.

Epstein, R.A. (2016). The Role of Guidances in Modern Administrative Procedure: The Case for De Novo Review. Journal of Legal Analysis, 8(1), 47-93.

Fedorchenko, N., Kalaur, I. (2017). Legal Regulation of Obligations on Service Delivery in the Context of the Development of Ukraine's Economy. Journal Transition Studies Review, 24(1), 34-39.

Gonzalez-Zapata, F., Heeks, R. (2015). The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 441-452.

Hryniak, A.B. (2013). Contractual obligations to perform work in the civil law of Ukraine. (Doctoral thesis, Jurisprudence). Institute of private law and entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv.

Ioffe, O.S. (1948). On some theoretical issues of civil law science. Bulletin of Leningrad University, 3, 84 – 97.

Kossak, V.M. (2004). Problems of termination of obligations under new Civil Code of Ukraine. Actual problems of state and law: collection of research papers, Legal literature, 23, 17.

Kuznietsova, N.S. (2013). Development of Civil Society and Modern Private Law in Ukraine. Private Law, 1, 51-64.

Markovits, D. (2015). Civility, rule-following, and the authority of law. Columbia Law Review. Retrieved from https://columbialawreview.org/content/civility-rule-following-and-the-authority-of-law/

Mikhno, О.І. (2004). Civil aspects of offset as a way to terminate contract. Problems of Legality: republican interdepartmental scientific reports, 67, 53.

Obolonkova, Е. (2010). Unilateral refusal from fulfillment of obligation: classification issue. Economy and Law, 2, 17.

Parkhomenko, N.M. (1998). Contract in System of Law of Ukraine. (Author’s thesis, Jurisprudence). Koretsky Institute of State and Law, Kiev.

Petrie, M. (2014). Jurisdictional integration: A framework for measuring and predicting the depth of international regulatory cooperation in competition policy. Regulation and Governance, 10(1), 75-92.

Sarbash, S. (2001). Termination of obligations by offset в arbitrary practice. Economy and Law, 10, 87-88.

Shershenevich, G.F. (1915) Textbook of Russian civil law. Moscow: Brat'ya Bashmakovy.

Shevchenko, L.I. (2005). On Concept, Essence and Meaning of Contractual Regulation of Property Relations in Market Economy. State and Law, 10, 43.

Syrotkina, А. (2009). Termination of obligations. Economy and Law, 4, 51.

Published

2019-02-04

How to Cite

V. Kostruba, A. (2019). Review of contractual obligations in the Civil Code of Ukraine . Estudios De Derecho, 76(167), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.v76n167a06