Revisión de las obligaciones contractuales en el Código Civil de Ucrania

Anatoliy V. Kostruba

doi:10.17533/udea.esde.v76n167a06

Autores

Anatoliy V. Kostruba Universidad Nacional Precarpática Vasyl Stefanyk https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-0929

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.v76n167a06

Palavras-chave:

base legal, auto-organização, alienação, transação legal, circunstância, Código Civil, Ucrânia

Resumo

A violação das obrigações contratuais pode causar consequências negativas. Este artigo analisa os aspectos teóricos da terminação de obrigações contratuais no Código Civil da Ucrânia. Igualmente, visa estudar os mecanismos de terminação de obrigações determinando o quadro legal para o seu funcionamento. O autor foca-se em uma das formas de terminação da obrigação contratual, especificamente no status de cancelamento e diferimento da transação legal. Usando funções reguladoras e protetoras da legislação, o autor procura determinar as especificidades dos fatos legais de natureza reguladora compensatória. Estabelece-se que as condições para o cancelamento de uma transação legal podem ser um mecanismo direto para a terminação de obrigações contratuais. Uma condição para o cancelamento pode ser aplicada a toda a transação ou a suas partes separadamente.

|Resumo

= 289 veces | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 30 veces| | PDF (ENGLISH)

= 260 veces|

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Anatoliy V. Kostruba, Universidad Nacional Precarpática Vasyl Stefanyk

Doctor in Law, associate Professor,Professor of the Departament of Civil Law, Vasyl Stefanyf Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukranie.

Referências

Bennett, T.B., Friedman, B., Martin, A.D., Smelcer, S.N. (2018). Divide & Concur: Separate Opinions & Legal Change. Cornell Law Review, 103(4), 817-878.

Calabresi, S.G. (2015). The unknown achievements of Justice Scalia. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 39(3), 575-578. Retrieved from http://harvardjlpp.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/39_3_Calabresi_F.pdf

Chilton, A.S., Versteeg, M. (2018). Courts’ Limited Ability to Protect Constitutional Rights. University of Chicago Law Review, 859(293), 293-335.

Civil Code of Ukraine. (2003). Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15

Code civil. (2017). Retrieved from https://constitutions.ru/?p=416.

Epstein, R.A. (2016). The Role of Guidances in Modern Administrative Procedure: The Case for De Novo Review. Journal of Legal Analysis, 8(1), 47-93.

Fedorchenko, N., Kalaur, I. (2017). Legal Regulation of Obligations on Service Delivery in the Context of the Development of Ukraine's Economy. Journal Transition Studies Review, 24(1), 34-39.

Gonzalez-Zapata, F., Heeks, R. (2015). The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 441-452.

Hryniak, A.B. (2013). Contractual obligations to perform work in the civil law of Ukraine. (Doctoral thesis, Jurisprudence). Institute of private law and entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv.

Ioffe, O.S. (1948). On some theoretical issues of civil law science. Bulletin of Leningrad University, 3, 84 – 97.

Kossak, V.M. (2004). Problems of termination of obligations under new Civil Code of Ukraine. Actual problems of state and law: collection of research papers, Legal literature, 23, 17.

Kuznietsova, N.S. (2013). Development of Civil Society and Modern Private Law in Ukraine. Private Law, 1, 51-64.

Markovits, D. (2015). Civility, rule-following, and the authority of law. Columbia Law Review. Retrieved from https://columbialawreview.org/content/civility-rule-following-and-the-authority-of-law/

Mikhno, О.І. (2004). Civil aspects of offset as a way to terminate contract. Problems of Legality: republican interdepartmental scientific reports, 67, 53.

Obolonkova, Е. (2010). Unilateral refusal from fulfillment of obligation: classification issue. Economy and Law, 2, 17.

Parkhomenko, N.M. (1998). Contract in System of Law of Ukraine. (Author’s thesis, Jurisprudence). Koretsky Institute of State and Law, Kiev.

Petrie, M. (2014). Jurisdictional integration: A framework for measuring and predicting the depth of international regulatory cooperation in competition policy. Regulation and Governance, 10(1), 75-92.

Sarbash, S. (2001). Termination of obligations by offset в arbitrary practice. Economy and Law, 10, 87-88.

Shershenevich, G.F. (1915) Textbook of Russian civil law. Moscow: Brat'ya Bashmakovy.

Shevchenko, L.I. (2005). On Concept, Essence and Meaning of Contractual Regulation of Property Relations in Market Economy. State and Law, 10, 43.

Syrotkina, А. (2009). Termination of obligations. Economy and Law, 4, 51.