Tragedy as liberty and theodicy: about a relation between Schiller and Hegel

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.12745

Keywords:

German Philosophy, Kantian Philosophy, Hegel, Tragedy, Liberty, Episteme, Absolute, Schiller, Theodicy

Abstract

This work will show how thought on the tragic as a literary genre but, farther from it, as a metaphor for the characteristic dualities of Modernity, played a fundamental role in the configuration and the development of the thought of both authors. Both for Schiller and for the young Hegel, Tragedy became the theoretical frame and the referential space of a proposal that, in the first case tries to recuperate the possibility of Liberty for Man in the World and, in the second case, interprets the movement of Thought in Reality. Along the text both the similarities they share and the differences between the two authors will be emphasized, starting from the way in which each of them understood and assimilated the tragic to his own reflection.

|Abstract
= 604 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 112 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María del Rosario Acosta López, Universidad de los Andes

Grupo de investigación Relativismo y racionalidad
Departamento de Filosofía
Universidad de los Andes
Bogotá, Colombia
maacosta@uniandes.edu.co

References

ESQUILO. Las Euménides. Gredos, Madrid, 1986.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Escritos de juventud. Tr. José María Ripalda. F. C. E., México, 1978.

____________. Sobre las maneras de tratar científicamente el Derecho Natural. Tr. Dalmacio Negro Pavón. Aguilar, Madrid, 1979.

____________. Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1980, vol. 2.

____________. Lecciones sobre la estética. Tr. Alfredo Brotóns Muñoz. Akal, Madrid, 1985.

SCHILLER, F. Schillers Werke. Nationalausgabe. Zwanzigster Band. Helmut Koopman und Benno von Wiese (eds.). Hermann Böhlaus, Weimar, 1962.

____________. Friedrich Schiller: Werke in Drei Bänden. Gerhard Fricke y Herbert G. Göpfert (eds.). Carl Hanser Verlag, München, 1984.

____________. Sobre la gracia y la dignidad. Sobre poesía ingenua y sentimental y una polémica Kant, Schiller, Goethe, Hegel. Tr. Juan Probst y Raimundo Lida. Icaria, Barcelona, 1985.

____________. Poesía filosófica. (Ed. bilingüe). Tr. y estudio introductorio de Daniel Innerarity. Hiperión, Madrid, 1991a.

____________. Escritos sobre estética. Tr. Manuel García Morente, Maria José Callejo Herranz y Jesús González. Tecnos, Madrid, 1991.

____________. “Sobre la gracia y la dignidad”. En: Sobre la gracia y la dignidad. Sobre poesía ingenua y sentimental y una polémica Kant, Schiller, Goethe, Hegel. Tr. Juan Probst y Raimundo Lida. Icaria, Barcelona, 1985. pp. 9-66.

____________. “Sobre lo patético”. En: Escritos sobre estética. Tr. Maria José Callejo Herranz y Jesús González. Tecnos, Madrid, 1991, pp. 65-96.

____________. “Sobre lo sublime”. En: Escritos sobre estética. Tr. Manuel García Morente, Maria José Callejo Herranz y Jesús González. Tecnos, Madrid, 1991, pp. 218-237.

Bibliografía secundaria

BARNOW, J. The Morality of the Sublime: Kant and Schiller. Studies in Romanticism, Boston, vol. 19 (4), 1980, pp. 497-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25600265

BEISER, F. The Romantic Imperative. Harvard, Cambridge, 2003.

BERCHAHN, K. Das Pathetischerhabene: Schiller Dramentheorie. En: Berghahn, K. (ed.). Schiller zur Theorie und Praxis der Dramen, Buchgesellschaft Wissenschafftliche, Darmstadt, 1972, pp. 485-522.

BREMER, D. Hegel und Aischylos. Hegel Studien, Hamburg, núm. 27, 1986, pp. 225-244.

BROOKS, L. The Menace of the Sublime to the Individual Self. Kant, Schiller, Coleridge and the Disintegration of Romantic Identity. Edwin Mellen Press, New York, 1995.

CAPUTO, R. De la Tragédie Grecque a la Tragédie Moderne: Généalogie du Tragique dans la Philosophie de Hegel a Iéna, Hegel Jahrbuch. Glauben und Wissen, Teil 2. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 2004, pp. 280-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/hgjb.2004.6.jg.280

FARREL, D. The Tragic Absolute: German Idealism And The Languishing of God. Indiana University Press, Indiana, 2005.

FRANK, M. The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism. Suny, New York, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book4754

GEORGE, T. Community in the Idiom of Crisis: Hegel on Political Life, Tragedy and the Dead. Research in Phenomenology, New York, vol. 32 (1), septiembre de 2002, pp. 123-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640260490593

HEUER, F. Darstellung der Freiheit. Schillers Transzendentale Frage nach der Kunst. Böhlau Verlag, Köln, 1970.

HYPPOLITE, J. Introduction à la philosophie de l’histoire de Hegel. Seuil, Paris, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/lsrel.hyppo.1983.01

____________. Le tragique et le rationnel dans la philosophie de Hegel. En: Figures de la pensée philosophique. PUF, Paris, 1991, pp. 254-261.

INNERARITY, D. Las disonancias de la libertad: destino, tragedia e historia universal en Hegel (2). Anuario filosófico, Pamblona, vol. 24 (2), 1991, pp. 243-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/009.24.29979

KOOPMAN, H. Kleinere Schriftennachder Begegnungmit Kant. En: Koopman, H. Schiller Handbuch. Alfred Kroner Verlag, Stuttgart, 1998, pp. 575-86.

MÁSMELA, C. Hölderlin: la tragedia. Ediciones del Signo, Buenos Aires, 2005.

MENKE, C. Ethischer Konflikt und ästhetische Spiel: zum Geschicht- philosophischen Ort der Tragödie bei Hegel und Nietzsche. En: Hegel Jahrbuch. Die Kunst der Politik-Die Politik der Kunst, Teil 1. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/hgjb.1999.1.jg.16

NOWAK-JUCHACZ, E. Die moderne Sittlichkeit bei Hegel: Antigone und Sokrates. En: Hegel Jahrbuch. Die Kunst der Politik-Die Politik der Kunst, Teil 2, Akademie Verlag, 1999, pp. 121-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/hgjb.1999.1.jg.121

PETRUS, K. Schiller über das Erhabene. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, Tübingen/Berlin, vol. 47 (1), 1999, pp. 23-40.

PÖGGELER, O. Hegel und die Griechische Tragödie. En: HegelsIdeeeiner Phänomenologie des Geistes. Freiburg, München, 1973, pp. 79-109.

ROSENSTSEIN, L. Metaphysical Foundations of the Theories of Tragedy in Hegel and Nietzsche. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Philadelphia, vol. 28 (4), 1970, pp. 521-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/428493

SCHAPER, E. Friedrich Schiller: Adventures of a Kantian. British Journal of Aesthetics, Oxford, vol. 4 (4), 1964, pp. 348-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/4.4.348

TAMINIAUX, J. Hegel and Hobbes. En: Dialectic and Difference: Finitude in Modern Thought. Humanities, New Jersey, 1985, pp. 1-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07561-4_1

____________. Le théâtre des philosophes. Jérome Million, Grenoble, 1995.

Published

2007-08-29

How to Cite

Acosta López, M. del R. (2007). Tragedy as liberty and theodicy: about a relation between Schiller and Hegel. Estudios De Filosofía, (36), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.12745

Issue

Section

Original or Research articles

Categories