Tragedy as liberty and theodicy: about a relation between Schiller and Hegel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.12745Keywords:
German Philosophy, Kantian Philosophy, Hegel, Tragedy, Liberty, Episteme, Absolute, Schiller, TheodicyAbstract
This work will show how thought on the tragic as a literary genre but, farther from it, as a metaphor for the characteristic dualities of Modernity, played a fundamental role in the configuration and the development of the thought of both authors. Both for Schiller and for the young Hegel, Tragedy became the theoretical frame and the referential space of a proposal that, in the first case tries to recuperate the possibility of Liberty for Man in the World and, in the second case, interprets the movement of Thought in Reality. Along the text both the similarities they share and the differences between the two authors will be emphasized, starting from the way in which each of them understood and assimilated the tragic to his own reflection.
Downloads
References
ESQUILO. Las Euménides. Gredos, Madrid, 1986.
HEGEL, G. W. F. Escritos de juventud. Tr. José María Ripalda. F. C. E., México, 1978.
____________. Sobre las maneras de tratar científicamente el Derecho Natural. Tr. Dalmacio Negro Pavón. Aguilar, Madrid, 1979.
____________. Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1980, vol. 2.
____________. Lecciones sobre la estética. Tr. Alfredo Brotóns Muñoz. Akal, Madrid, 1985.
SCHILLER, F. Schillers Werke. Nationalausgabe. Zwanzigster Band. Helmut Koopman und Benno von Wiese (eds.). Hermann Böhlaus, Weimar, 1962.
____________. Friedrich Schiller: Werke in Drei Bänden. Gerhard Fricke y Herbert G. Göpfert (eds.). Carl Hanser Verlag, München, 1984.
____________. Sobre la gracia y la dignidad. Sobre poesía ingenua y sentimental y una polémica Kant, Schiller, Goethe, Hegel. Tr. Juan Probst y Raimundo Lida. Icaria, Barcelona, 1985.
____________. Poesía filosófica. (Ed. bilingüe). Tr. y estudio introductorio de Daniel Innerarity. Hiperión, Madrid, 1991a.
____________. Escritos sobre estética. Tr. Manuel García Morente, Maria José Callejo Herranz y Jesús González. Tecnos, Madrid, 1991.
____________. “Sobre la gracia y la dignidad”. En: Sobre la gracia y la dignidad. Sobre poesía ingenua y sentimental y una polémica Kant, Schiller, Goethe, Hegel. Tr. Juan Probst y Raimundo Lida. Icaria, Barcelona, 1985. pp. 9-66.
____________. “Sobre lo patético”. En: Escritos sobre estética. Tr. Maria José Callejo Herranz y Jesús González. Tecnos, Madrid, 1991, pp. 65-96.
____________. “Sobre lo sublime”. En: Escritos sobre estética. Tr. Manuel García Morente, Maria José Callejo Herranz y Jesús González. Tecnos, Madrid, 1991, pp. 218-237.
Bibliografía secundaria
BARNOW, J. The Morality of the Sublime: Kant and Schiller. Studies in Romanticism, Boston, vol. 19 (4), 1980, pp. 497-514.
BEISER, F. The Romantic Imperative. Harvard, Cambridge, 2003.
BERCHAHN, K. Das Pathetischerhabene: Schiller Dramentheorie. En: Berghahn, K. (ed.). Schiller zur Theorie und Praxis der Dramen, Buchgesellschaft Wissenschafftliche, Darmstadt, 1972, pp. 485-522.
BREMER, D. Hegel und Aischylos. Hegel Studien, Hamburg, núm. 27, 1986, pp. 225-244.
BROOKS, L. The Menace of the Sublime to the Individual Self. Kant, Schiller, Coleridge and the Disintegration of Romantic Identity. Edwin Mellen Press, New York, 1995.
CAPUTO, R. De la Tragédie Grecque a la Tragédie Moderne: Généalogie du Tragique dans la Philosophie de Hegel a Iéna, Hegel Jahrbuch. Glauben und Wissen, Teil 2. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 2004, pp. 280-85.
FARREL, D. The Tragic Absolute: German Idealism And The Languishing of God. Indiana University Press, Indiana, 2005.
FRANK, M. The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism. Suny, New York, 2004.
GEORGE, T. Community in the Idiom of Crisis: Hegel on Political Life, Tragedy and the Dead. Research in Phenomenology, New York, vol. 32 (1), septiembre de 2002, pp. 123-138.
HEUER, F. Darstellung der Freiheit. Schillers Transzendentale Frage nach der Kunst. Böhlau Verlag, Köln, 1970.
HYPPOLITE, J. Introduction à la philosophie de l’histoire de Hegel. Seuil, Paris, 1983.
____________. Le tragique et le rationnel dans la philosophie de Hegel. En: Figures de la pensée philosophique. PUF, Paris, 1991, pp. 254-261.
INNERARITY, D. Las disonancias de la libertad: destino, tragedia e historia universal en Hegel (2). Anuario filosófico, Pamblona, vol. 24 (2), 1991, pp. 243-271.
KOOPMAN, H. Kleinere Schriftennachder Begegnungmit Kant. En: Koopman, H. Schiller Handbuch. Alfred Kroner Verlag, Stuttgart, 1998, pp. 575-86.
MÁSMELA, C. Hölderlin: la tragedia. Ediciones del Signo, Buenos Aires, 2005.
MENKE, C. Ethischer Konflikt und ästhetische Spiel: zum Geschicht- philosophischen Ort der Tragödie bei Hegel und Nietzsche. En: Hegel Jahrbuch. Die Kunst der Politik-Die Politik der Kunst, Teil 1. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
NOWAK-JUCHACZ, E. Die moderne Sittlichkeit bei Hegel: Antigone und Sokrates. En: Hegel Jahrbuch. Die Kunst der Politik-Die Politik der Kunst, Teil 2, Akademie Verlag, 1999, pp. 121-125.
PETRUS, K. Schiller über das Erhabene. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, Tübingen/Berlin, vol. 47 (1), 1999, pp. 23-40.
PÖGGELER, O. Hegel und die Griechische Tragödie. En: HegelsIdeeeiner Phänomenologie des Geistes. Freiburg, München, 1973, pp. 79-109.
ROSENSTSEIN, L. Metaphysical Foundations of the Theories of Tragedy in Hegel and Nietzsche. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Philadelphia, vol. 28 (4), 1970, pp. 521-533.
SCHAPER, E. Friedrich Schiller: Adventures of a Kantian. British Journal of Aesthetics, Oxford, vol. 4 (4), 1964, pp. 348-362.
TAMINIAUX, J. Hegel and Hobbes. En: Dialectic and Difference: Finitude in Modern Thought. Humanities, New Jersey, 1985, pp. 1-37.
____________. Le théâtre des philosophes. Jérome Million, Grenoble, 1995.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
