Distinctions regarding practical philosophy. Indirect conceptual questions to discursive ethics

Authors

  • Friedlrich Kambartel Johann Wolfgang Goethe University
  • Francisco Cortés Rodas Universidad de Antioquia

Keywords:

Habermas, ethics, speech theory

Abstract


This article is a critique on the discursive ethics of Habermas, according to which a theory of discourse based on the rational consent is not a proper foundation for understanding moral philosophy. The author sets forth another perspective to define the frame of morality. For him, morality is related lo our basic conditions of corporeity and rationality. Then, the moral intend would be to protect those basic necessities to a worthy human life.

|Abstract
= 91 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 44 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2019-05-09

How to Cite

Kambartel, F., & Cortés Rodas, F. (2019). Distinctions regarding practical philosophy. Indirect conceptual questions to discursive ethics. Estudios De Filosofía, (13), 141–153. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/estudios_de_filosofia/article/view/338444

Issue

Section

Translation

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.