Immunity to error through misidentification and the functionalist, self-reflexive account of episodic memory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n64a10Keywords:
immunity to error through misidentification, memory judgments, episodic memory, self-awareness, metaphysics of memoryAbstract
Fernández (2019) offers an account of the nature of episodic memory that marries two core ideas: (i) role-functionalism about episodic memory, and (ii) self-reflexive mnemonic content. One payoff of this view is that episodic memory judgments are immune to error through misidentification. Fernández takes this to reveal something important about the nature of one’s self-awareness in memory and our first-person conception of ourselves. However, once one sees why such judgments are immune in this way, according to the proposed account, the fact that they are immune becomes moot. While technically immune to error through misidentification, episodic memory judgments are not grounded in a way such that they have any interesting epistemological import for the subject (in contrast to other paradigms of such judgments), and any insights about our self-awareness and self-conception are directly derivable from the metaphysics of memory content alone.
Downloads
References
Behan, D. (1979). Locke on persons and personal identity. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 9, 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1979.10716236
Bermúdez, J. L. (2012). Memory judgments and immunity to error through misidentification. Grazer Philosphische Studien, 84(1), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207904_007
Bermúdez, J. L. (2013). Immunity to error through misidentification and past-tense memory judgments. Analysis, 73(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/ant002
Brown, A. S., Croft Caderao, K., Fields, L. M. & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Borrowing personal memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 471-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3130
Cappelen, H. & Dever, J. (2013). The inessential indexical: on the philosophical insignificance of perspective and the first person. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686742.001.0001
Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford University Press.
Fernández, J. (2006). The intentionality of memory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 84, 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400600571695
Fernández, J. (2014). Memory and immunity to error through misidentification. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 5, 373-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-014-0193-4
Fernández, J. (2019) Memory: a self-referential account. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190073008.001.0001
Grice, H. P. (1941). Personal identity. Mind, 50, 330-350. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/L.200.330
Hamilton, A. (2007). Memory and self-consciousness: immunity to error through misidentification. Synthese, 171, 409-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9318-6
Higginbotham, J. (2010) On words and thoughts about oneself. In F. Recanati, I. Stojanovic & N. Villaneuva (Eds.), Context-dependence, perspective, and relativity (pp. 253-282). De Gruyter Mouton.
Horgan, T. & Kriegel, U. (2007). Phenomenal epistemology: what is consciousness that we may know it so well?. Philosophical Issues, 17, 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2007.00126.x
Ismael, J. (2012). Immunity to error as an artefact of transition between representational media. In S. Prosser & F. Recanati (Eds.), Immunity to error through misidentification: new essays. Cambridge University Press.
Levine, J. (2018). Conscious awareness and (self-) representation. In Quality and content: essays on consciousness, representation, and modality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198800088.003.0007
McCarroll, C. (2018). Remembering from the outside: personal memory and the perspectival mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190674267.003.0007
Merlo, G. (2017). Three questions about immunity to error through misidentification, Erkenntnis, 82, 603-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9834-6
Michaelian, K. (2020). Episodic memory is not immune to error through misidentification: against Fernández. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02652-w
Millar, A. (1991). Reasons and experiences. Clarendon. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198242703.001.0001
Olson, E. T. (2019). Personal identity. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/identity-personal/
Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and persons. Clarendon.
Pasupathi, M. & Wainryb, C. (2018). Remembering good and bad times together: functions of collaborative remembering. In M. Meade, C. Harris, P. Van Bergen, J. Sutton & A. Barnier (Eds.), Collaborative remembering: theories, research, and applications. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198737865.003.0015
Pillemer, D. B., Steiner, K. L., Kuwabara, K. J., Thomsen, D. K. & Svob, C. (2015). Vicarious memories. Consciousness and cognition, 36, 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.010
Prosser, (2012). Sources of immunity to error through misidentification. In S. Prosser and F. Recanati (Eds.), Immunity to error through misidentification: new essays. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043274
Pryor, J. (1999). Immunity to error through misidentification. Philosophical Topics, 26, 271-304. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics1999261/246
Recanati, F. (2007). Perspectival thought: a plea for (moderate) relativism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230532.001.0001
Reese, E. & Brown, N. (2000). Reminiscing and recounting in the preschool years. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200001)14:1<1::AID-ACP625>3.0.CO;2-G
Ross, L. & Ward, A. (1996). Naïve realism: implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In T. Brown, E. Reed & E. Turiel (Eds.), Values and Knowledge (pp. 103-35). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 262, 773–786. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2087
Sheen, M., Kemp, S. & Rubin, D. (2001). Twins dispute memory ownership: a new false memory phenomenon. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 779-788. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196407
Shoemaker, S. (1959). Personal identity and memory. The Journal of Philosophy, 56(22), 868-882. https://doi.org/10.2307/2022317
Shoemaker, S. (1968). Self-reference and self-awareness. Journal of Philosophy, 65, 555-567. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024121
Shoemaker, S. (1970). Persons and their pasts. American Philosophical Quarterly, 7, 269-285.
Soteriou, M. (2000). The particularity of visual perception. European Journal of Philosophy, 8, 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00107
Tye, M. (2009). Consciousness revisited: materialism without phenomenal concepts. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012737.001.0001
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. Blackwell.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Steven James
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
