Blaise Pascal: Politics as a différance of God’s will
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.355752Keywords:
Behaviour, Force, Grace, Justice, Pascal, OrderAbstract
Pascal's work is punctuated by a paradox. On the one hand, only a handful of the texts that constitute it are explicitly political; on the other hand, it is haunted by a constant political concern. To resolve this paradox, the paper shows that Pascal incites us to rethink the very definition of politics. Emerging on the basis of a double human nature marked by the Fall, violence is an ontological problem that arises from the need to preserve an infinite object for human love. For this reason, its solution lies in affective self-regulation, which makes politics an exclusively behavioralist field that cannot be a part of the intimacy of individuals who belong to another order. Thus, Pascalian politics does no more than serve the same gesture of the divine creation of the human being that keeps him alive to praise God. Pascalian politics is, then, an indirect way of realizing God’s will: its différance.
Downloads
References
Albiac, G. (2007). À la place de Dieu : sur les paradoxes du politique chez Pascal et Spinoza. In Bove L., Bras G. & Méchoulan E. (dir.), Pascal et Spinoza, Pensées du contraste : de la géométrie du hasard à la nécessité de la liberté. París: Editions Amsterdam, 285-293.
Albiac, G. (2011). Sumisiones voluntarias. La invención del sujeto político: de Maquiavelo a Spinoza. Madrid: Tecnos.
Deleuze, G. (2004). Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Precursor of Kafka, Celine, and Ponse. In Desert Islands and Other Texts 1953-1974. Trans. Michael Taormina. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 52-55.
Derrida, J. (1992). Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority.” In Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. Trans. Mary Quaintance. New York: Routledge, 3-67.
Descartes, R. (2000). Meditations and Other Metaphysical Writings. Trans. Desmond M. Clarke. London: Penguin Books.
Goldmann, L. (2013). The Hidden God. Trans. Philip Thody. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431696
Harman, G. (2014). Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. London: Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183p1ks
Hobbes, T. (1998). Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jacquet, C. (2007). Force et droit chez Pascal et Spinoza. En Bove L., Bras G. & Méchoulan E. (dir.), Pascal et Spinoza, Pensées du contraste : de la géométrie du hazard à la nécessité de la liberté. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam, 295-307.
Lazzeri, C. (1993). Force et justice dans la politique de Pascal. Paris: PUF. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.lazze.1993.01
Marion, J-L. (2004). Sur le prisme métaphysique de Descartes. Constitution et limites de l’onto-théo-logie dans la pensée cartésienne. Paris: PUF. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.mario.2004.02
Moya, C. (2011). Prólogo al Leviatán. In Thomas Hobbes, Leviatán. Buenos Aires: Losada, 7-29.
Nadler, S. (2018). Spinoza: A Life. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635387
Nicole, P. (2011). Introduction au Discours sur la conditions des grands. In: Blaise Pascal, Pensées, opuscules et lettres. Paris: Garnier, 745-747.
Olivo-Poindron, I. (2010). Du moi humain au moi commun: Rousseau lecteur de Pascal. Les études philosophiques, 2010/4 (N°95), 557-595. https://doi.org/10.3917/leph.104.Q557
Pascal, B. (1901). The Thoughts of Blaise Pascal. Trans. C. Kegan Paul. London: George Bell and Sons.
Pascal, B. (1910a). Discourses on the Condition of the Great. In The Harvard Classics. Blaise Pascal. Thoughts. Letters. Minor Works. Trans. O. W. Wight. New York: P. F. Collier & Son Corporation, 378-382.
Pascal, B. (1910b). Letters. In The Harvard Classics. Blaise Pascal. Thoughts. Letters. Minor Works. Trans. M. L. Booth. New York: P. F. Collier & Son Corporation, 321-364.
Pascal, B. (1910c). Of the Geometrical Spirit. In The Harvard Classics. Blaise Pascal. Thoughts. Letters. Minor Works. Trans. O. W. Wight. New York: P. F. Collier & Son Corporation, 421-436.
Pascal, B. (1910d). The Art of Persuasion. In The Harvard Classics. Blaise Pascal. Thoughts. Letters. Minor Works. Trans. O. W. Wight. New York: P. F. Collier & Son Corporation, 400-410.
Pascal, B. (1910e). Thoughts. In The Harvard Classics. Blaise Pascal. Thoughts. Letters. Minor Works. Trans. W. F. Trotter. New York: P. F. Collier & Son Corporation, 9-320.
Pascal, B. (1952). The Provincial Letters. In The Provincial Letters. Pensées. Scientific Treatises. Trans. Thomas M’Crie. London: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1-170.
Pascal, B. (1999). Pensées and Other Writings. Trans. Honor Levi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pascal, B. (2011). Pensées, opuscules et lettres. Paris: Garnier.
Petit, T. (2023). Pascal. Paris: Ellipses.
Ramond, C. (2005). La loi du nombre (ou la démocratie comme « régime absolu »), In Spinoza, CEuvres completes, Tome V, Traité Politique. Paris: PUF, 7-43.
Spinoza, B. (1887a). A Political Treatise. In The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol. I. Trans. R. H. M. Elwes. London: George Bell and Sons, 279-387.
Spinoza, B. (1887a). Theologico-Political Treatise. In The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol. I. Trans. R. H. M. Elwes. London: George Bell and Sons, 1-278.
Spinoza, B. (1901a). Correspondence. In The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol. II. Trans. R. H. M. Elwes. London: George Bell and Sons, 273-420.
Spinoza, B. (1901b). On the Improvement of the Understanding. In The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol. II. Trans. R. H. M. Elwes. London: George Bell and Sons, 1-38.
Spinoza, B. (2018). Ethics. Proved in Geometrical Order. Trans. Michael Silverthorne and Matthew J. Kisner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Terrel, J. (2001). Les théories du pacte social. Droit naturel, souveraineté et contrat de Bodin à Rousseau. Paris: Seuil.
Thirouin, L. (2011). Le hasard et les règles. Le modèle du jeu dans la pensée de Pascal. Paris: Vrin.
Vínolo, S. (2013) La majorité contre la foule. Revue Cités, N°53 (1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.3917/cite.053.0Q87
Vínolo, S. (2016) Spinoza et l’argent-La politique comme économie des passions. Revue philosophique de Louvain, 114(2), 221-244. https://doi.Org/10.2143/RPL.114.2.3162209
Zarka, Y. C. (2016). Hobbes and Modern Political Thought. Trans. James Griffith. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474401203
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Stéphane Vínolo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
