Covered Violences in Global Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n49a08Keywords:
Global Governance, Critical Perspectives, Worldview, Postcolonialism, PostestructuralismAbstract
The article problematizes the ontological assumptions under which global governance —as a concept and as a political project— is conceived, and how this institutionalizes and perpetuates the exclusion through covered violences that habilitate certain forms of being in the world. Among them, the process of constructing the Other and the acceptance of a determined form of knowing reality, restricting the possibility of thinking the political in other possible ways. Drawing from International Relations´critical perspectives such as poststructuralism and postcolonialism, some insights are offered to think of global governance differently.
Downloads
References
(1) Amoore, Louise y Langley, Peter. (2003). Ambiguities of Global Civil Society. Review of International Studies, 30 (1), pp. 88-110.
(2) Ayoob, Mohammed. (1995). The Third World Security Predicament. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
(3) Barnett, Michael y Duvall, Robert (eds.). (2005). Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
(4) Beier, John M. (2005). International Relations in Uncommon Places. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979506
(5) Blaser, Mario. (2013). Un Relato de la Globalización desde El Chaco. Popayán: Universidad del Cauca.
(6) De la Cadena, Marisol. (2010). Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Antes: Conceptual Reflections beyond "Politics". Cultural Anthropology, 25 (2), pp. 334–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01061.x
(7) Chakrabarty, Dipesh. (2000). Introduction. The Idea of Provincializing Europe. Provincializing Europe (pp. 3-23), Princeton: Princeton University.
(8) Chatterjee, Partha. (2008). La Nación en tiempo Heterogéneo y otros estudios subalternos. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, Siglo XXI.
(9) Comisión de Naciones Unidas sobre Gobernanza Global (CNUGG). (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood. Oxford: Oxford University.
(10) Cox, Robert. (1992). Towards a Post-Hegemonic Conceptualization of World Order: Reflections on the Relevancy of Ibn Khaldun. En: Rosenau, James y Czempiel, Ernst O. (eds.). Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (pp. 132-159). Cambridge: Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521775.007
(11) Croal, Peter y Darou, Wes. (2002). Canadian First Nations' Experiences with International Development. En: Sillitoe, Peter; Biecker, Alan y Pottier, Johan (eds.). Participating in Development. Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge (pp. 82-107). Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.
(12) Cumbre de los Pueblos Río+20. (2012). Proyecto de Declaración Universal de los Derechos de la Madre Tierra. Recuperado de http://rio20.net/propuestas/declaracion-universal-de-los-derechos-de-la-madre-tierra/
(13) De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. (2006). Globalizations. Theory Culture Society, 23, pp. 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300268
(14) Dussel, Enrique. (2000). Europa, modernidad y eurocentrismo. En: Lander, Edgardo (ed.). La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y Ciencias Sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas (pp.41-54). Buenos Aires: Clasco, Unesco.
(15) Doyle, Michael. (1983). Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12 (3), pp. 205-235.
(16) Escobar, Arturo. (2005). Más allá del Tercer Mundo. Globalización y Diferencia. Bogotá, D. C.: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia.
(17) Escobar, Arturo. (2007). La invención del Tercer Mundo. Construcción y deconstrucción del desarrollo. Caracas: El Perro y La Rana.
(18) Estermann, Josef. (2012). Filosofía andina. Sabiduría indígena para un mundo nuevo. La Paz: Instituto Superior Ecuménico Andino de Teología.
(19) Falk, Richard. (2002). La globalización depredadora. Una crítica. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
(20) Finkelstein, Lawrence. (1995). What is Global Governance? Global Governance, 1 (3), pp. 367-372.
(21) Finnemore, Martha y Sikkink, Kathryn. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52 (4), pp. 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
(22) Foucault, Michel. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry 8 (4), pp. 777-795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
(23) Foucault, Michael. (2010). La Arqueología del saber. México, D. F.: Siglo XXI.
(24) Fukuyama, Francis. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. Nueva York: Simon & Shuster.
(25) Gandarillas, Humberto; Salazar, Luis; Sánchez, Loyda; Sánchez, Luis Carlos y de Zutter, Pierre. (1994). Dios da el agua ¿Qué hacen los proyectos? Manejo del agua y organización campesina. La Paz: Hisbol.
(26) Harding, Sandra (ed.). (2004). What is 'Strong Objectivity'?" En: The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader (pp. 127-140). Londres: Routledge.
(27) Harvey, David. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
(28) Hoffmann, Matthew y Ba, Alice (eds.). (2005). Contending Perspectives on Global Governance. Coherence, Contestation and World Order. Londres Nueva York: Routledge.
(29) Ignatieff, Michael. (2003). Los derechos humanos como política e idolatría. Barcelona: Paidós.
(30) Inayatullah, Naeem y Blaney, David. (2004a). Introduction. En: International Relations and the Problem of Difference (pp. 1-18). Londres: Routledge.
(31) Inayatullah, Naeem y Blaney, David. (2004b). IR and the Inner Life of Modernization Theory. En: International Relations and the Problem of Difference(pp. 93-126). Londres: Routledge.
(32) Katzenstein, Peter; Keohane, Robert y Krasner, Stephen. (1998). International Organization and the Study of Wordl Politics. International Organization, 52 (4), pp. 645-685.
(33) Keohane, Robert y Nye, Joseph. (2001). Power and Interdependence. Nueva York: Longman.
(34) Laffey, Mark y Weldes, Jutta. (2005). Policing and Global Governance. En: Barnett, Michael y Duvall, Robert (eds.). Power in Global Governance (pp. 59-79). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
(35) Law, John. (2011). What ' s Wrong with a One-World. Heterogeneities, pp. 1-14.
(36) Lederer, Markus y Müller, Philipp (eds.). (2005). Criticizing Global Governance. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979513
(37) Lightfoot, Sheryl Rae. (2009). Indigenous Global Politics [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Minnesota.
(38) Ling, Lilly y Pinheiro, Carolina. (2012). Dialogics in Multiple Worlds: "Creative Listening" for the Us/West. Working paper.
(39) Martin, Lisa y Simmons, Beth. (1998). Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization, 52 (4), pp. 729-757. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550734
(40) Massey, Doreen. (2006). For Space. Londres: Sage.
(41) Mignolo, Walter. (2013). Geopolitics of Sensing and Knowing: On (De)Coloniality, Border Thinking, and Epistemic Disobedience. Confero Essays on Education Philosophy and Politics, 1 (1), pp. 129-150. https://doi.org/10.3384/confero.2001-4562.13v1i1129
(42) Muppidi, Himadeep. (2005). Colonial and Postcolonial Global Governance. En: Barnett, Michael y Duvall, Raymond (eds.). Power in Global Governance (pp. 273-293). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
(43) Muppidi, Himadeep. (2012). The Colonial Signs of International Relations. Nueva York: Columbia University.
(44) Murphy, Craig. (2002). Why Pay Attention to Global Governance? En: Wilkinson, Rorden y Hughes, Steve (eds.). Global Governance Critical Perspectives (pp. I-XIX). Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.
(45) Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). (2011). Working with ECOSOC. An NGOs Guide to Consultative Status. Recuperado de http://csonet.org/content/documents/Brochure.pdf
(46) Picq, Manuela. (2013). Indigenous Worlding: Kichwa Women Pluralizing Sovereignty. En: Tickner, Arlene y Blaney, David (eds.). Claiming the International. Worlding Beyond the West (pp. 121-140). Nueva York: Routledge.
(47) Rist, Gilbert. (2002). The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith. Londres y Nueva York: Zed.
(48) Rivera Cusicanqui, Silvia. (2010). Violencias (re) encubiertas en Bolivia. La Paz: La Mirada Salvaje.
(49) Rosenau, James. (2006). The Study of World Politics Vol. 2. Nueva York: Routledge.
(50) Rosenau, James y Czempiel, Ernst O (eds.). (1992). Governance without Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521775
(51) Said, Edward. (2002). Orientalismo. Barcelona: Random House Mondandori.
(52) Späth, Konrad. (2005). Inside Global Governance: New Borders of a Concept. En: Hoffmann, Matthew y Ba, Alice (eds.). Contending Perspectives on Globl Governance. Coherence, Contestation and World Order (pp. 21-44) Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.
(53) Sillitoe, Paul; Bicker, Alan y Pottier, Johan (eds.). (2002). Participating in Development. Approaches to Indigenus Knowledge. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
(54) Tapia, Luis. (2010). El Estado en condiciones de abigarramiento. En: García Linera, Álvaro; Prada Alcoreza, Raúl; Tapia, Luis y Vega, Oscar (eds.). El Estado. Campo de lucha (pp. 97-128). La Paz: Muela del Diablo.
(55) Tapia, Luis. (2011). Una geopolítica de la complementariedad. En: Farah, Ivonne y Vasapollo, Luciano (eds.). Vivir bien: ¿paradigma no capitalista? (pp. 383-400). La Paz: Cides-UMSA.
(56) Tickner, Arlene B. y Blaney, David L. (eds.). (2012). Introduction: Thinking Difference. En: Thinking International Relations Differently (pp. 1- 24). Londres: Routledge.
(57) Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. (2004). Perspectivismo e multinaturalismo na América indígena. O Que Nos Faz Pensar, 18, pp. 1-30.
(58) Walker, Robert .B. J. (1993). Inside/Outside. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
(59) Walker, Robert. B. J. (2006). The Double Outside of the Modern International. Ephemera. Global Conflicts, 6 (1), pp. 56-69.
(60) Weldes, Jutta. (1996). Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International Relations, 2 ( 3), pp. 275-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066196002003001
(61) Whitman, Jim. (2005). The Limits of Global Governance. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
(62) Zolo, Danilo. (2008). Globalización. Un mapa de los problemas. Bilbao: Mensajero.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Estudios Políticos authorizes the copy of articles and texts for academic purposes or the internal use of institutions as long as the proper citation of the source is provided. Total or partial reproduction of the journal with different purposes should have an explicit authorization by the Institute of Politic Studies of the University of Antioquia.
The views and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not necessary reflect or bind those of the Institute of Political Studies of the University of Antioquia.
