Práctica regular de actividad física: influencia del género y la posición socioeconómica

Claudia M. Hormiga S.

doi:10.17533/udea.rfnsp.26559

Autores/as

Claudia M. Hormiga S. Universidad Nacional de Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.26559

Resumen

Actualmente existe evidencia científica sólida sobre los beneficios de la práctica regular de actividad física, a partir de la cual se han elaborado recomendaciones internacionales sobre la cantidad de actividad física semanal que la población general puede realizar para obtener los beneficios en salud documentados.

|Resumen

= 146 veces | PDF

= 55 veces| | HTML

= 15 veces|

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Claudia M. Hormiga S., Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Doctorado interfacultades en salud pública. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Bogotá. Colombia.

Citas

(1). Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.

(2). Organización Mundial de la Salud. Recomendaciones mundiales sobre actividad física para la salud. Suiza: oms; 2010.

(3). Organización Mundial de la Salud. Enfermedades crónicas y promoción de la Salud. steps: Informes de las encuestas en los países. [Internet] [acceso junio 12 de 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/chp/steps/reports/es/.

(4). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [Internet] [acceso agosto 13 de 2011]. Disponible en: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/list.asp?cat=PA&yr=2009&qkey=4418&state=All

(5). Fonseca Z, Heredia AP, Ocampo PR, Forero Y, Sarmiento OL, Álvarez MC, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Situación Nutricional en Colombia. ensin 2010. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar; 2011.

(6). Hormiga CM, Otero JA, León MH, Rodríguez LA. Factores de riesgo para enfermedades crónicas en Santander. Método stepwise. Bucaramanga: Secretaría de Salud de Santander Observatorio de Salud Pública de Santander; 2011.

(7). Naciones Unidas. Informe del Secretario General. Prevención y control de las enfermedades no transmisibles. onu; 2011.

(8). Dishman RK, Sallis JF, Orenstein DR. The Determinants of Physical Activity and Exercise. Public Health Reports. 1985;100(2):158-171.

(9). Dishman RK, Washburn RA, Heath GW. Physical Activity Epidemiology. United States: Human Kinetics Publishers; 2004.

(10). Thomas JR, Nelson JK, Silverman SJ. Research Methods in Physical activity. 5ª ed. United States of America: Human Kinetics Publishers; 2005.

(11). Pender NJ, Murdaugh CL, Parsons MA. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. 5ª ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc; 2006.

(12). De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis J, Vandelanotte C. Tracking and explanation of physical activity in young adults over a 7-year period. Res Q Exerc Sport 2002; 73(4): 376-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2002.10609037

(13). Billie G-C. People or places: What should be the target? Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2006; 9(5): 357-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.06.021

(14). McLeroy K, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988; 15(4): 351-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401

(15). Ball K. People, places...and other people? Integrating understanding of intrapersonal, social and environmental determinants of physical activity. J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9(5): 367-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.06.010

(16). Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med 2002; 54(12): 1793-1812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00150-2

(17). Ball K, Timperio A, Salmon J, Giles-Corti B, Roberts R, Crawford D. Personal, social and environmental determinants of educational inequalities in walking: a multilevel study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007; 61(2): 108-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.048520

(18). Ishii K, Shibata A, Oka K. Environmental, psychological, and social influences on physical activity among Japanese adults: structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity 2010; 7: 61-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-61

(19). Blacksher E, Lovasi GS. Place-focused physical activity research, human agency, and social justice in public health: Taking agency seriously in studies of the built environment. Health & Place 2012; 18(2): 172-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.019

(20). Gidlow C, Johnston LH, Crone D, Ellis N, James D. A systematic review of the relationship between socio-economic position and physical activity. Health Education Journal. 2006; 65(4): 338-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896906069378

(21). Cleland VJ, Ball K, Magnussen C, Dwyer T, Venn A. Socioeconomic Position and the Tracking of Physical Activity and Cardiorespiratory Fitness From Childhood to Adulthood. American Journal of Epidemiology 2009; 170(9): 1069-1077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp271

(22). Melvyn H. Occupational Social Class, Occupational Physical Activity, and Leisure-Time Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2011; 40(4): 494-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.001

(23). Van Domelen DR, Koster A, Caserotti P, Brychta RJ, Chen KY, McClain JJ, et al. Employment and Physical Activity in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2011; 41(2): 136-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.019

(24). Krieger N. Epidemiology and the people´s health. Theory and context. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc; 2011.

(25). Ruiz-Cantero MT, Vives-Cases C, Artazcoz L, Delgado A, García Calvente MdM, Miqueo C, et al. A framework to analyse gender bias in epidemiological research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007; 61(Suppl 2): ii46-ii53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.062034