Cultural Practices and Seismic Risk Management: Culture of Good Habits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v33n3a08Keywords:
social behavior disaster, social psychology, cultural practices, cultural psychologyAbstract
Objective: to recognize and understand cultural practices and meanings related to seismic risk management of a community that has lived different situations of this kind in the city of Manizales, Caldas. Methodology: is a qualitative research, based on micro-ethnography and qualitative analysis, assuming that these type of research focuses in a analysis on the historical and cultural context of communities. Results: cultural practices related to risk management are creations with meaning since a particular model of cultural internalization about the seismic phenomenon. This process is supported in the community, learning from family values and moral conventions adopted it for an ideology of prevention and survival, that is legitimate for the community. On the other hand, the non-symbolic appropriation of knowledge of technical-scientific situation creates community resistance to the appropriation of new content, because they don’t feel a real respect and inclusion of their cultural Conclusion: that risk management is not just to reducing the risk, it necessary to understand the social understanding of cultural practices, behaviors and lifestyles (including ideologies and perspectives of the world, of life, of religion), in social terms, it requires the participation of various strata and sectors of interest representative groups, and thus recognize how risk management is built collectively as a culture of good habits.
Downloads
References
(1). Oficina de las Naciones Unidas para la reducción de riesgo de desastres y Corporación Osso. Impacto de los desastres en América Latina y el Caribe, 1990-2011; 2013.
(2). Chávez N. La Cartografía social: un procedimiento para la planeación participativa en el nivel local. Santiago de Cali: CVC; 2001.
(3). Organización Panamericana de la Salud. La Salud Pública en las Américas. Nuevos Conceptos, Análisis del Desempeño y Bases para la Acción. Washington, D.C.: OPS; 2002.
(4). Narváez L, Lavell A, Pérez, G. La gestión del riesgo de desastres: un enfoque basado en procesos. Perú: Secretaría General de la Comunidad Andina; 2009.
(5). Sistema Nacional de Gestión del Riesgo de Desastre. Normatividad del sistema nacional para la gestión del riesgo de desastres. Colombia: Exprecards C.I S.A.S Impresores; 2012.
(6). Wilches-Chaux G. Herramientas para la crisis: desastres, ecologismo y formación profesional. Colombia: SENA; 1989.
(7). Bruner, J. Actos de significado. Más allá de la revolución cognitiva. España: Alianza; 1991, p. 76, 80, 49.
(8). Briones G. Epistemología de las Ciencias Sociales. Módulo 1. En: Especialización en teoría, métodos y técnicas de investigación social. Bogotá: ICFES; 1996.
(9). Lavoy J. Oficio de cartógrafo. Travesías latinoamericanas de la comunicación en la cultura. México: FCE; 2005.
(10). Rodríguez C, Lorenzo O, Herrera L. Teoría y práctica del análisis de datos cualitativos. Proceso general y criterios de calidad. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades SOCIOTAM [revista en internet] 2005. [acceso 23 de febrero de 2013]; XV(2). Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=65415209
(11). Maykut P, Morehause R. Beginning Qualitative Research, A philosopchic and practical guide. Grear Britain: The Falmer Press; 1994, p. 11.
(12). Ander E. Hacia una pedagogía autogestionada. Buenos Aires: Editorial Humanitas; 1986.
(13). Sandoval CA. Investigación Cualitativa. Bogotá: ICFES; 2011.
(14). Vygotski L. Historia del desarrollo de las funciones psíquicas superiores. Madrid: Visor; 1995, p. 83, 78.
(15). Kolb D. Aprendizaje Experiencial: La experiencia como la fuente del aprenizaje y del desarrollo. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1984.
(16). Bandura A. Social Foundations of thought and action. N.J.: Prentice Hall; 1996.
(17). Audefroy J. Desastres y cultura: Una aproximación teórica. Revista del Instituto de la Vivienda. Revista INVI [revista en internet] 2007 agosto. [acceso 12 de octubre 2012]; 22(60): [119-132]. Disponible en: http://www.revistas.uchile.cl/index.php/INVI/article/viewFile/8769/8571
(18). Saavedra MD. Desastre y Riesgo. Actores sociales en la reconstrucción de Armero y Chinchiná. Bogotá: CINEP; 1996, p. 49.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
