Public Health, University and Power. The University that We Want

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v37n1a03

Keywords:

public health, higher education, power, neoliberalism, science, social medicine, critical epidemiology

Abstract

In line with the proposals made by Hector Abad Gomez, in this text, the authors question the role of higher education of our times, contributing elements to transcend from a domesticated functionalist public health. In here, we call for a university as a space of social self-awareness, in which intercultural thinking could be possible, constructed working close together with communities, and which may be able to produce a radical critique of a voracious market society. It draws the attention on the social determination of science and the critical moment that public health is currently facing, subordinated to a biomedical drug model and a predominant thinking of branches. To transcend from a hegemonic public health and construct a decolonized university obligates rethinking the way to construct the object of “Healthcare” and the way to think about it; it implies the development of a radical critical thought regarding the commodification of life, and the recovery of our own knowledge and wisdom. This is the challenge of collective Latin American Healthcare in the 21st century.

|Abstract
= 377 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 210 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jaime Breilh Paz y Miño, Simón Bolívar Andean University

Doctor of Epidemiology. Former rector; director of the Center for Research and Evaluation of Impacts on Collective Health (CILABSalud) and coordinator of the PhD in Health, Environment and Society at the Simón Bolívar Andean University. Ecuador.

References

(1). Gómez HA. Fundamentos éticos de la salud pública. 2.a ed. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia, Corporación para la Educación y la Salud Pública Héctor Abad Gómez; 2012.

(2). Pasolini PP. Escritos corsarios. Madrid: Del Oriente y del Mediterraneo; 2009.

(3). Santos, B de S. Construyendo las epistemologías del sur: para un pensamiento alternativo de alternativas. Volumen 1. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: clacso; 2018.

(4). Galeano E. Las venas abiertas de América Latina. Montevideo: Universidad de la República; 1971.

(5). Bourdieu P. O poder simbólico. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil; 1998.

(6). Cohen B. La revolución newtoniana y la transformación de las ideas científicas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial; 1983.

(7). Waitzkin H. Medicine and Public Health at the End of Empire. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishers; 2011.

(8). Waitzkin H, y Working Group on Health Beyond Capitalism (Eds.). Health Care Under the Knife: Moving Beyond Capitalism for Our Health. New York: Monthly Review Press; 2018.

(9). Marmot M, Wilkinson R, editores. Social Determinants of Health. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.

(10). Foucault M. The subject and power. En: Dreyfus HL, Rabinow P, editores. Michel Foucault Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1982. pp. 208-26.

(11). Jones R, Wilsdon J. The Biomedical Bubble. Why uk research and innovation needs a greater diversity of priorities, politics, places and people [internet]; 2018 [citado: 2018 ago. 24]. Disponible en: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/The_Biomedical_Bubble_v6.pdf

(12). Dussel E. Cómo derrotar el sucursalismo académico: tareas emancipadoras de la universidad en el siglo xxi. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, sede Ecuador; 2018.

(13). Virchow R. Report on the typhus epidemic in Upper Silesia 1848. Am J Public Heal. 2006;96(12):2102-5.

Published

2019-01-31

How to Cite

1.
Paz y Miño JB. Public Health, University and Power. The University that We Want. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública [Internet]. 2019 Jan. 31 [cited 2025 Feb. 2];37(1):8-14. Available from: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/337274

Issue

Section

Comunicación especial