Promoting health within the community: community therapy as strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.7960Keywords:
community, community therapy, support networks, promotion, preventionAbstract
Objective: to identify, by assessing the records of community therapy meetings, the everyday problems that affect communities in order to understand and map the pain and suffering expressed by the participants. Methodology: the records created by the therapists after each meeting were used for data collection. The following two topics were chosen for analysis purposes: the problems that were presented and the ones that were chosen. Likewise, analysis categories were identified based on the frequency with which they were mentioned by the participants. The records of 774 meetings were analyzed. Such meetings took place from August, 2006 to December, 2008. An average of 9 to 20 people attended each meeting. Results: openness, freedom, warmth, and respect were characteristics of these meetings. The most common problems were: domestic violence, sexual abuse, divorce, discrimination, feelings of guilt, abandonment, rage, fear, negligence, problems with children, partners, co-workers or neighbors, losing one’s job, one’s loved ones or one’s material possessions, drug addiction, alcoholism, smoking, etc. Conclusions: community therapy has led not only to identify the people who really are in need of treatment, but also contributed to reduce the demand for the municipality’s health services. Having people meet without judging them by what they say, feel or think makes it easier for them to cope with their suffering and fears. It also creates social support networks, develops better attitudes of solidarity, responsibility and affectiveness, empowers the people and the community, and makes it easier to find better ways of overcoming problems. At the same time, it makes it possible to learn how people live and cope with their daily problems, thus allowing them to reframe these problems, and enabling the development of more effective care.
Downloads
References
(1). Briceño LR. Siete tesis sobre la educación sanitaria para la partici-pación comunitaria. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 1996; 12(1): 7-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X1996000100002
(2). Valla VV. Educação e saúde: do ponto de vista popular. En: Valla VV, coordinador. Saúde e Educação. Rio de Janeiro: dp&a; 2000.
(3). Toro AJB. Mobilização social - um modo de construir a democracia e a participação. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica; 2004.
(4). Freire P. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários para a prática educativa. 7.ª ed. São Paulo: Ed. Paz e Terra; 1998.
(5). Góis CWL. Saúde comunitária: pensar e fazer. São Paulo: Ade-raldo & Rothschild; 2008.
(6). Vasconcelos EM. Educação popular e a atenção à saúde da família. São Paulo: Hucitec/Min. Saúde; 2001.
(7). Barreto AP. Terapia Comunitária passo a passo. Fortaleza: Gráfica LCR; 2005.
(8). Rogers C. Sobre o poder pessoal. São Paulo: Martins Fontes; 2001.
(9). Nogueira MA, Martins CM. Bourdieu & a educação. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica; 2004.
(10). Lacerda A, Valla VV. As práticas Terapêuticas de Cuidado Integral à Saúde como Proposta para Aliviar o Sofrimento. En: Pi-nheiro R, Mattos RA, organizadores. Cuidado: as fronteiras da integralidade. Rio de Janeiro: Hucitec/Abrasco; 2004.
(11). Sluzki CE. A rede social na prática sistêmica. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 1997.
(12). Freire P. Educação e mudança. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra; 1979.
(13). Souza, MC. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 10.ª ed. São Paulo: Ed. Hucitec; 2007.
(14). Cajide J. La investigación cualitativa: tradiciones y perspectivas contemporáneas, Revista Bordón 1992; 44(4): 357-373.
(15). Amezcua M, Gálvez A. Los modos de análisis en investigación cualitativa en salud: perspectiva crítica y reflexiones en voz alta. Revista Española de salud pública 2002; 76(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1135-57272002000500005
(16). Fuentes M. Psicologia e Saúde: A Terapia Comunitária como instrumento de sensibilização para o trabalho com comunidades na formação do psicologo. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão 2011; 31(2): 420-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-98932011000200016
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Martha Fuentes R.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "