Proyecto de Municipios Centinela: Evaluación del Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud. Colombia 1995-1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.900Keywords:
Municipality observatory, sentinel municipality, evaluation, reform, logic frame, factor analysis, Integrated Social Security System, solidarity, covering, equity, efficiency and qualityAbstract
Downloads
References
(1). Colombia. Ley 100 de 1993 y decretos reglamentarios.
(2). Colombia, Ministerio de Salud. Proyecto Municipios Centinela: marco metodológico y con-ceptual. Documento de trabajo. Bogotá; 1997.
(3). Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. ProgramaSistemas Municipales de Salud. Términos dereferencia proyecto municipios centinela. Documento de trabajo. Santafé de Bogotá; 1998.
(4). Brownlee A, Pathmanathan I, Varkevisser C.Diseño y realización de proyectos de investiga-ción sobre sistemas de salud: análisis de datosy redacción de informes. Vol 2, parte II. Otawa:Centro Internacional de Investigaciones parael Desarrollo, CIID; 1995.
(5). Pathmanathan I. Managing health systemsresearch. Ottawa: CIID; 1992.
(6). Polit D, Hungler B. Investigación científica enciencias de la salud. 4ª. ed. México:Interamericana; 1994. 563 p.
(7). Villamil F, Keenoy E. Alternativas de integra-ción de niveles asistenciales. Granada: Escue-la Andaluza de Salud Pública; 1998.
(8). Villamil F, Keenoy E. La gestión del cambioen los servicios sanitarios. Granada: EscuelaAndaluza de Salud Pública; 1998.
(9). Cerda CH. La investigación total: la unidadmetodológica en la investigación científica.Santafé de Bogotá: Cooperativa Editorial delMagisterio (Colección Mesa Redonda); 1994.
(10). Tamayo M. El Proceso de la investigacióncientífica. 3ª. ed. México, Limusa; 1996.
(11). Vasco A. La Investigación Cualitativa. En: Cur-so metodología de la investigación en salud. Mó-dulo XI, Segunda Parte. Barcelona: IDER; 1995.
(12). Blalock H. Introducción a la investigaciónsocial. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu; 1994.
(13). García FM, Ibáñez J, Alvira F, (compiladores).El análisis de la realidad social, métodos y técnicas de investigación. Madrid: Alianza; 1994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "