Analysis of some processes in the System of Beneficiary Selection and satisfaction with the health service in Rionegro, Antioquia, Colombia, 1998

Authors

  • Alba Luz Restrepo Universidad de Antioquia
  • Gladis Eugenia Arias Arango señora
  • Liliana Patricia Montoya Vélez señora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.985

Keywords:

Health General System of Social Security, beneficiaries selection system (SISBEN), focalization

Abstract

The Health General System of Social Security is a mixed organization constituted by two regimens, the contributive and the one subsidized,they will have a national coordination and financial channels of solidarity.The System outlines that the affiliation of the salary earners and of the people with payment capacity be mandatory and they are linked to this through the régime contributive by means of the payment of rates, the rest of the population, that is to say, population's groups without payment capacity will have access through the subsidized regime.The law created then the structuring of a regime of subsidies to the demand put to this population that allows their affiliation to the system. In this article some aspects of the focalization, affiliation and satisfaction of the users who are the object of the subsidy are analyzed in the municipality of Rionegro (Antioquia) in the year of 1998.They took 2197 socioeconomic classification records belonging to the population family nucleus of levels I and II, of which a sample of 400 records was selected
to analyze the main characteristics of the subsidized population of this municipality, comparing the real situation with the quality of life and the socioeconomic stratification with regard to the beneficiaries selection system.The satisfaction of the users was also measured from the moment of the focalization beginning with the affiliation and the same use of the services. To carry out the comparisons they are used:distributions of frequency, trust intervals, application of the distribution chi2, and application of the index of kappa.
|Abstract
= 201 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 66 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1). Agudelo ME et al. Grado de satisfacción de los usuarios del servicio de consulta médica del Instituto de Fracturas y Lesiones Deportivas Ltda. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia. Facultad Nacional de Salud pública; 1992. 40 p.

(2). Departamento Nacional de Planeación, Unidad de Desarrollo Social, Misión Social. SISBEN. Sistema de selección de beneficiarios para Programas Sociales. Santafé de Bogotá; 1994. Vol. 1-Vol. 5.

(3). Gómez E. El control total de la calidad. Colombia: Legis; 1991. p. iv.

(4). Hoyos MI. La calidad a través de la gerencia en salud: módulo de administración. Manizales: Universidad de Caldas. Facultad de Ciencias para la salud. Programa de Enfermería. Monografías Universitarias; 1996. 550 p.

(5). Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. Decreto 2174 del 28 de noviembre de 1996, por el cual se organiza el sistema obligatorio de garantía de calidad del Sistema General de Seguridad Social. Santafé de Bogotá.

(6). República de Colombia. Comité académico del proyecto preparatorio de la cumbre social contra la pobreza y por la equidad. Superación de la pobreza y construcción de una sociedad equitativa: Retos para la Colombia del nuevo milenio. En: Conferencia nacional sobre pobreza, equidad y desarrollo social. Santafé de Bogotá; Nov. de 1997.

(7). Republica de Colombia. Constitución Política República de Colombia 1991. Colombia. 195 p.

(8). República de Colombia. Ley 10 de 10 enero de 1990, por la cual se organiza el Sistema Nacional de Salud y se dictan otras disposiciones. Santafé de Bogotá: El Congreso de la República; 1990.

(9). República de Colombia. Ley 60 de 12 de agosto de 1993, por la cual se dictan normas orgánicas sobre la distribución de competencias de conformidad con los artículos 151 y 288 de la Constitución Política y se distribuyen recursos según los artículos 356 y 357 de la Constitución Política y se dictan otras disposiciones. Santafé de Bogotá: El Congreso de la República; 1993.

(10). República de Colombia. La Seguridad Social en Colombia: Ley 100 de 1993. Ministerio de Salud. Santafé de Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud; 1994. 132 p.

(11). República de Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. La reforma de la seguridad social en salud: Antecedentes y resultados. Santafé de Bogotá: Carrera Séptima Ltda.; 1995. 1v.

(12). República de Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. El sector salud en Colombia: pasado, presente y futuro. En: Reunión especial sobre reforma del sector salud. Washington: Ministerio de Salud; 1995. p. 1-3, 13-23.

(13). República de Colombia. Red de solidaridad social de Colombia. Nueva estrategia de lucha contra la pobreza. En: Conferencia nacional sobre pobreza, equidad y desarrollo social. Santafé de Bogotá: Red de solidaridad social de Colombia; 1997. p. 11-12.

(14). Zapata RJ. La calidad en la prestación del servicio y la satisfacción de los proveedores de servicios médico-asistenciales al Instituto de los Seguros Sociales, Seccional Antioquia. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia. Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública; 1993. 54 p.

(15). Zuluaga C et al. Grado de satisfacción del usuario con los servicios de consulta médica y farmacia del CAA Hernán Posada González del ISS de Itagüí. Medellín 1998. Tesis de grado (Especialización en Administración de Servicios de Salud). Universidad de Antioquia. Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública.

Downloads

Published

2009-03-27

How to Cite

1.
Restrepo AL, Arias Arango GE, Montoya Vélez LP. Analysis of some processes in the System of Beneficiary Selection and satisfaction with the health service in Rionegro, Antioquia, Colombia, 1998. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública [Internet]. 2009 Mar. 27 [cited 2025 Jan. 31];18(2). Available from: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/985

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2000)

Section

Research

License

The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors

The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.

The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.

When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.

Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.

The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.

The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.

The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC