Construct validity of the Scale to Measure Adherence to functional Neurorehabilitation processes (SMAN) in adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.e341716Keywords:
Validation Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Neurological RehabilitationAbstract
Objective: To determine the construct validity of the Scale to Measure Adherence to functional Neurorehabilitation processes (SMAN) in adults.
Methodology: Instrumental study, with a cross-sectional design, in which the confirmatory factor analysis method was used for an initial model of 5 factors and 20 items. The maximum likelihood method was used and univariate, and multivariate normality tests were performed. The hypothesized model was evaluated with absolute, incremental and parsimony adjustment measures. For the definitive model, reliability and convergent and discriminant validity were calculated through a correlation matrix.
Results: For the initial model (M0), the modification indices showed cross-loading related to constructs of “disability” and “patient”. Therefore, a theoretical review of instrument items was made, and two redundant items were eliminated, one in each factor. After model re-specification (M2), SMAN was constituted by 5 factors and 18 items.
Conclusion: SMAN has remarkable and reliable psychometric properties to measure adherence in populations with functional deficits associated with neurological conditions
Downloads
References
World Health Organization, editor. Neurological disorders: Public health challenges. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
Jin J, Sklar GE, et al. Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient’s perspective. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008;4:269-86. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.2147/tcrm.s1458
Organización Mundial de la Salud. Adherencia a los tratamientos a largo plazo. Pruebas para la acción. Ginebra: Organización Panamericana de la Salud [internet]; 2004 [citado 2020 abr. 14]. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/spanish/ad/dpc/nc/adherencia-largo-plazo.pdf
Coetzee N, Andrewes D, Khan F, et al. Predicting compliance with treatment following stroke: A new model of adherence following rehabilitation. Brain Impair: Cambridge University Pres. 2008;9(2):122-39. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1375/brim.9.2.122
Bassett SF. The assessment of patient adherence to physiotherapy rehabilitation. NZ Journal of Physiotherapy. 2003 [citado 2020 abr. 27]; 31(2):60-66. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284411604_The_assessment_of_patient_adherence_to_physiotherapy_rehabilitation
Duncan PW, Horner RD, Reker DM, et al. Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(1):167-78. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1161/hs0102.101014
Mapipa HV. Identifying contributing factors for poor adherence to rehabilitative services in patients with neurological conditions [dissertation]. [Pretoria]: University of Pretoria [internet]; 2014 [citado 2020 may. 14]. Disponible en: https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/46138
Duncan TE, McAuley E. Social support and efficacy cognitions in exercise adherence: A latent growth curve analysis. J Behav Med. 1993;16:199-218. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1007/BF00844893
Frier A, Barnett F, Devine S. The relationship between social determinants of health, and rehabilitation of neurological conditions: a systematic literature review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017(10);39:941-8. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1172672
Zinn S. Patient adherence in rehabilitation. H. Bosworth, E. Oddone, M. Weinberger, editors. Patient treatment adherence. Concepts, interventions, and measurement. Londres: Taylor & Francis; 2008. pp. 195-236 DOI: https://DOI.org/10.4324/9781410615626
Jurkiewicz MT, Marzolini S, Oh P. Adherence to a home-based exercise program for individuals after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(3):277-84. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1310/tsr1803-277
Pishkhani MK, Dalvandi A, et al. Adherence to a rehabilitation regimen in stroke patients: A concept analysis. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020;25:139-45. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_170_18
Munce SEP, Graham ID, Salbach NM, et al. Perspectives of health care professionals on the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of a stroke rehabilitation guidelines cluster randomized controlled trial. bmc. Health Serv Res. 2017;17:440. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2389-7
Koudriavtseva T, Onesti E, Pestalozza IF, et al. The importance of physician–patient relationship for improvement of adherence to long-term therapy: Data of survey in a cohort of multiple sclerosis patients with mild and moderate disability. Neurol Sci. 2012;33:575-84. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0776-0
Khoshbakht Pishkhani M, Dalvandi A, Ebadi A, Hosseini M. Factors affecting adherence to rehabilitation in Iranian stroke patients: A qualitative study. J Vasc Nurs 2019;37(4):264-71. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.jvn.2019.07.001
Wentink MM, Meesters J, Berger MAM, et al. Adherence of stroke patients with an online brain training program: The role of health professionals’ support. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(5):359-65. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1080/10749357.2018.1459362
Turner AP, Knowles LM. Behavioral interventions in multiple sclerosis. Fed Pract. [internet]. 2020 [citado 2020 abr. 28]; 37(Suppl. 1):S31–S35. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182244/
Allen NE, Song J, Paul SS, et al. Predictors of adherence to a falls prevention exercise program for people with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2015;2(4):395-401. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1002/mdc3.12208
Colombo R, Pisano F, Mazzone A, et al. Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2007;4:3. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-3
Suttanon P, Hill KD, Said CM, et al. Factors influencing commencement and adherence to a home-based balance exercise program for reducing risk of falls: Perceptions of people with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(7):1172-82. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1017/S1041610211002729
Yao M, Chen J, Jing J, Sheng H, Tan X, Jin J. Defining the rehabilitation adherence curve and adherence phases of stroke patients: An observational study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1435-41. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.2147/PPA.S139854
Letendre SL, Ellis RJ, et al. Neurologic complications of hiv disease and their treatment. Top hiv Med. 2010;18(2):45-55.
Essery R, Geraghty AWA, et al. Predictors of adherence to home-based physical therapies: A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(6):519-34. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1153160
Glass SP, Matin N, Williams B, et al. Neuropsychiatric factors linked to adherence and short-term outcome in a U.S. functional neurological disorders clinic: A retrospective cohort study. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017;30:152-9. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17060117
Tiedemann A, Sherrington C, Dean CM, et al. Predictors of adherence to a structured exercise program and physical activity participation in community dwellers after stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1155/2012/136525
Amofa Sr PA, DeFeis B, De Wit L, et al. Functional ability is associated with higher adherence to behavioral interventions in mild cognitive impairment. Clin Neuropsychol. 2019;34(5):937-955. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1672792
Silva MA, Calvo D, Brennan EM, et al. Incidence and predictors of adherence to sleep apnea treatment in rehabilitation inpatients with acquired brain injury. Sleep Med 2020;69:159-67. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2020.01.016
Grindley EJ, Zizzi SJ, Nasypany AM. Use of protection motivation theory, affect, and barriers to understand and predict adherence to outpatient rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2008;88(12):1529-40. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.2522/ptj.20070076
Grindley EJ, Zizzi SJ. Using a multidimensional approach to predict motivation and adherence to rehabilitation in older adults. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2005;21(3):182-93. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1097/00013614-200507000-00004
Kernan WN. Keeping Faith With Patients After Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack. jama Neurol. 2018;75(4):404-5. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4027
Clay DL, Hopps JA. Treatment adherence in rehabilitation: The role of treatment accommodation. Rehabil Psychol. 2003;48(3):215-9. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1037/0090-5550.48.3.215
Iuga AO, McGuire MJ. Adherence and health care costs. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2014;7:35-44. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.2147/RMHP.S19801
Martín Alfonso L. Repercusiones para la salud pública de la adherencia terapéutica deficiente. Rev Cuba Salud Pública [internet]. 2006 [citado 2020 may. 13]; 32(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-34662006000300013
Silva GE, Galeano E, Correa JO. Adherencia al tratamiento. Implicaciones de la no-adherencia. Acta Méd Colomb. [internet] 2005 [citado 2020 abr. 14]; 30(4):268-73. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1631/163113820004.pdf
Frost R, Levati S, McClurg D, et al. What adherence measures should be used in trials of home-based rehabilitation interventions? A systematic review of the validity, reliability, and acceptability of measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(6):1241-56.e45. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.482
Quiroz CA. Instrumento para evaluar adherencia de personas adultas a procesos de neurorehabilitación funcional basado en las dimensiones propuestas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Rev Fac Nac de Salud Pública [internet]. 2014 [citado 2020 abr. 14]; 32(1):52-61. Disponible en: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/13378
Quiroz CA, Perez JE. Reliability instrument to assess adherence to adult long term functional neurorehabilitation process (sman 1.0). Physiotherapy. 2015;101(Supl. 1):e1245-6. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.1147
Lloret-Segura S, Ferreres-Traver A, et al. El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. An Psicol. 2014;30(3):1151-69. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Batista-Foguet JM, Coenders G, Alonso J. Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Su utilidad en la validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. Med Clín. 2004;122(Supl. 1):21-27. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1157/13057542
Ryu E. Effects of skewness and kurtosis on normal-theory based maximum likelihood test statistic in multilevel structural equation modeling. Behav Res Methods. 2011;43:1066-74. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0115-7
Rodríguez-Ayán MN, Ruiz-Díaz MA. Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica [internet]. 2008 [citado 2020 abr. 14]; 29(2): 205-27. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/169/16929206.pdf
Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with amos, basic concepts, applications and programming. 3.a ed. Nueva York: Routledge [internet]; 2016 [citado 2020 may. 14]. Disponible en: https://crispindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Structural-equation-modeling-with-AMOS.pdf
Cole JC, Motivala SJ, Khanna D, et al. Validation of single-factor structure and scoring protocol for the health assessment questionnaire-disability index. Arthritis Care Res. 2005;53(4):536-42. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1002/art.21325
Wheaton B, Muthén B, et al. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociol Methodol. 1977;8:84-136. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.2307/270754
Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods [internet] 2008 [citado 2020 abr. 14]; 6(1):53-60. Disponible en: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/buschmanart/2/
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1-55. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 2015;43:115-35. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Oviedo HC, Campo-Arias A. Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. [internet]. 2005 [citado 2020 abr. 14]; 34(4):572-80. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/806/80634409.pdf
Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol. 2014;105(3):399-412. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39-50. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Prieto G, Delgado AR. Fiabilidad y validez. Papeles Psicólogo [internet]. 2010 [citado 2020 abr. 14]; 31(1):67-74. Disponible en: http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1797.pdf
Shek DTL, Yu L. Confirmatory factor analysis using amos: A demonstration. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2014;13(2):191-204. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2014-0305
Rossini Y, Estrada O, et al. Factores relacionados con adherencia a un programa de rehabilitación. rfs Rev Fac Salud. 2010;2(1):39-50. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.25054/rfs.v2i1.28
Maclean N, Pound P, et al. The concept of patient motivation. Stroke. 2002;33(2):444-8. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1161/hs0202.102367
Bandura A. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1986;4(3):359-73. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
Morris JH, Oliver T, Kroll T, Joice S, Williams B. Physical activity participation in community dwelling stroke survivors: Synergy and dissonance between motivation and capability. A qualitative study. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(3):311-21. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.physio.2016.05.001
Levy T, Laver K, Killington M, et al. A systematic review of measures of adherence to physical exercise recommendations in people with stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(3):535-45. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1177/0269215518811903
Sharot T. The optimism bias. Curr Biol. 2011;21(23):R941-5. DOI: https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030
Van de Mortel TF. Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian J Advanced Nursing [internet]. 2005 [citado 2020 abr. 14]; 25(4): 40-48. Disponible en: https://www.ajan.com.au/archive/Vol25/Vol_25-4_vandeMortel.pdf
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Universidad de Antioquia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "