Survival of children withlow weight at birth in aneonatal intensive careunit, Medellín, 1997-2001

Authors

  • Juan Fernando Muñoz Universidad de Antioquia
  • Hugo Grisales R Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.706

Keywords:

Survival, infant, low birth weight, intensive care

Abstract

Objective: to determine the survival of children with low weight at birth hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit of a hospital of third level of complexity in the city of Medellín, between 1997 and 2001, with the purpose of identifying some characteristics related to the probability of dying and the time of survival of the newborn. Methodology: information concerning the objective was gathered on the basis of a population of 809 newborns. To estimate the survival the pertinent charts of life were built and to value its significance with regard to variables of interest, the Kaplan Meier method, the log rank test, and the Cox proportional hazards model were used. Results: 50% of the 809 newborns entered to the service in less than 24 hours after birth, reaching a stay for an average of 7.8 days, time during which the hyaline membrane illness occurred to 76% of them. The accumulated survival probability diminished gradually by 50% in the first 28 days of hospitalization; the descent was slower after day 29; it is worthy of notice that 59.7% of the deaths occurred before the first 7 days of hospitalization. During hospitalization, 51.5% of the children with excessive low weight at birth died. This fact implied a descent of 33% in the survival accumulated in the first 4 days of hospitalization. 
|Abstract
= 278 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 41 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan Fernando Muñoz, Universidad de Antioquia

Profesor Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública

References

(1). Hospital General de Medellín Luz Castro deGutiérrez. Empresa Social del Estado. Porta-folio de servicios: análisis de mercado. Mede-llín: El Hospital, 1996. p. 4-7.

(2). Schwarcz R. Importancia del bajo peso al nacer en la salud materno infantil. En: IX Con-greso Uruguayo de Ginecología: Simposio BajoPeso al Nacer. Resumen de las exposiciones.Montevideo: CLAP;1986. p. 3-13.

(3). Paneth N. Recent trends in preterm delivery ra-tes in the United States. INSERM Colloque:Prevention of Preterm Birth 1986; 138: 15-30

(4). McCormick MC, Shapiro S, Starfield BH. Theregionalization of perinatal services: summaryof the evaluation of a National DemonstrationProgram. JAMA 1985; 253: 799-804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1985.03350300087026

(5). Capurro H. Técnicas apropiadas en perinatolo-gía: cuarenta trabajos seleccionados, Resúme-nes y recomendaciones. Montevideo: CentroLatinoamericano de Perinatología y Desarro-llo Humano (CLAP); 1984. p. 20-21.

(6). Schwarcz R, Duverges CA, Días G, Fescina RH.Obstetricia. 4ª ed. Buenos Aires: El Ateneo;1986. p. 125-126, 549-550, 561-562, 570-572.

(7). Reyes FJ et. al. Riesgo obstétrico asociado asep-sis neonatal en un hospital de maternidad deSanto Domingo. Rev Med Sur 1994;3 (1):28-29.

(8). Meadow W, Reimshisel T, Lantos J. Birth weig-ht-specific mortality for extremely low birthweight infants vanishes by four days of life:epidemiology and ethics in the neonatal inten-sive care unit. Pediatrics 1996; 97(5):636-643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.97.5.636

(9). Tommiska V, Heinonen K, Ikonen S, Kero P,Pokela ML, Renlund M, Virtanen M, FellmanV. A national short-term follow-up study of ex-tremely low birth weight infants born in Fin-land in 1996-1997. Pediatrics 2001; 107: E2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.1.e2

(10). Sinclair JC, Torrance GW, Boyle MH, et al.Evaluation of neonatal intensive care progra-ms. New Engl J Med 1981; 305(9):489-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198108273050904

(11). Hack M, Fanaroff A. Outcomes of extremelylow birth weight infants between 1982 and1988. New Engl J Med 1989;321:1642-1647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198912143212405

(12). Schwartz FJ, Ritchie R, Sacks L, Phillips C.Music, stress reduction and medical cost sa-vings in the neonatal intensive care unit. At-lanta: Piedmont Hospital. Departments of Anes-thesiology and Neonatology; 1984. Disponibleen internet: http://www.transitionsmusic.com/ISMM_ ARTICLE.html

(13). Collins SK, Kuck K. Music therapy in the neo-natal intensive care unit. Neonatal Netw1991;9(6):23-26.

(14). Caine J. The effects on music on the selectedstress behaviors, weight, caloric and formulaintake, and length of hospital stay of prematureand low birth weight neonates in a newborn in-tensive care unit. J Music Ther 1991;18:88-100.

(15). Zahr LK, Traversay JD. Premature infant res-ponses to noise reduction by earmuffs: effectson behavioral and physiologic measures. J Perinatol 1995;15(6):448-455.

(16). Coleman JM, Pratt RR, Stoddar RA, GerstmannDR, Abel H. The effects of male and femalesinging and speaking voices on selected physiological and behavioral measures of prema-ture infants in the intensive care unit. Int J ArtsMed 1998;5(8): 4-11.

(17). Chan KN, Elliman A, Bryan E, Silverman M.Respiratory symptoms in children of low birthweight. Arch Dis Child 1989;64:1294-1304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.64.9.1294

(18). Mansell AL, Driscoll JM, James LS. Pulmona-ry follow-up of moderately low birth weightinfants with and without respiratory distresssyndrome. J Pediatr 1987;110: 111-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80301-3

(19). Silverman WA. Overtreatment of neonates? Apersonal retrospective. Pediatrics 1992;90:971-976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.90.6.971

(20). Tyson J, Younes N, Verter J, Wright L. Viability,severe morbidity, and resource needs associatedwith intensive care of newborns 501-800 gramsbirth weight. Future Child 1995;5:245-252.

(21). Tyson J. Evidence based ethics and the care ofpremature infants. Future Child 1995;5:197-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1602515

(22). Torrance GW, Boyle GW, Harwood SP. Appli-cation of multi-attribute utility theory to mea-sure social preferences for health states. OperRes 1982;30:1043-1069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.6.1043

(23). Consensus Statement from the Danish Medi-cal Research Council, Danish Hospital Institu-te. Extremely preterm infants. Int J Technol As-sess Health Care 1992;8:548-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462300013830

(24). Levin BW. International perspectives on treat-ment choice in neonatal intensive care units.Social Sci Med 1990;30:901-912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90218-H

(25). Buchanan N. The low birth weight infant: me-dical, ethical, legal, and economic considera-tions. Med J Aust 1987;147:184-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1987.tb133354.x

(26). Wainer S, Khuzwayo H. Attitudes of mothers,doctors, and nurses toward neonatal intensivecare in a developing society. Pediatrics 1993;6:1171-1175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.91.6.1171

(27). Renzong Q. Economics and medical decisionmaking: A chinese perspective. Semin Perina-tol 1987;11:262-263.

Published

2009-02-09

How to Cite

1.
Muñoz JF, Grisales R H. Survival of children withlow weight at birth in aneonatal intensive careunit, Medellín, 1997-2001. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública [Internet]. 2009 Feb. 9 [cited 2025 Dec. 6];22(1). Available from: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/706

Issue

Section

Research