Two Perceptual Perspectives of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors

  • Diego Alejandro Estrada-Mesa Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8102-7229
  • Luis Felipe Higuita-Gutiérrez Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.276

Keywords:

Clinical Epidemiology, Evidence-Based Medicine, Clinical Reasoning
|Abstract
= 402 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 160 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Diego Alejandro Estrada-Mesa, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

Professor, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.

Luis Felipe Higuita-Gutiérrez, Universidad de Antioquia

Professor, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia. Professor, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

References

(1) Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D, Cook D, Haynes B, Hirsh J, et al. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence Based Medicine. A New Approach to Teaching the Practice of Medicine. JAMA [Internet]. 1992;268(17):2420-2425. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032

(2) Boussageon R. L'evidence based medicine (ebm) et la légitimité du pouvoir de guérir. R d'Éthique Théolo Moral [Internet]. 2011;(266):33-46. https://doi.org/10.3917/retm.266.0033

(3) Armstrong D. Clinical Autonomy, Individual and Collective: The Problem of Changing Doctor's Behavior. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2002;55(10):1771-1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00309-4

(4) Tröhler U. "To Improve the Evidence in Medicine:" The 18th Century British Origins of a Critical Approach. Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. Edinburgh. 2000

(5) Canguilhem G. Estudios de historia y de filosofía de las ciencias. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu editors; 2009.

(6) Estrada-Mesa DA. La búsqueda de la objetividad sin perspectiva. Apuntes histórico-epistemológicos en torno al juicio clínico en medicina. Tópicos [Internet]. 2024;(69):447-83. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v690.2612

(7) Feinstein A. Clinical judgment. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Company; 1967.

(8) Canguilhem G. Ideología y racionalidad en la historia de las ciencias de la vida. Buenos Aires Amorrortu Editores. 2005.

(9) Feinstein AR. Clinical Judgment Revisited: The Distraction of Quantitative Models. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 1994;120(9):799. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-120-9-199405010-00012

(10) Estrada-Mesa DA, Higuita-Gutiérrez LF. La ciencia del juicio clínico de Alvan Feinstein: una solución a las brechas entre la investigación y la clínica. Iatreia [Internet]. 2024;37(1):106-18. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.227

(11) World Health Organization. No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/04-01-2023-no-level-of-alcohol-consumption-is-safe-for-our-health

(12) Yang Y, Zhao N, Ma T, Yuan Z, Deng C. 'Paperdemic' during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Intern Med [Internet]. 2023;108:111-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2022.09.030

(13) Menshawey, R., Menshawey, E., Mitkees, A. et al. A plagiarism paperdemic: determining plagiarism among COVID-19 articles in infectious disease journals between 2020 and 2021. Bull Natl Res Cent 47, 151 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-023-01129-3

(14) Li Y, Mao Y, Zhang Y, Cai S, Chen G, Ding Y, et al. Alcohol drinking and upper aerodigestive tract cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol [Internet]. 2014;50(4):269-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.12.015

(15) Jin M, Cai S, Guo J, Zhu Y, Li M, Yu Y, et al. Alcohol drinking and all cancer mortality: a meta-analysis. Ann Oncol [Internet]. 2013;24(3):807-16. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds508

(16) Chavalarias D, Ioannidis JP. Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2010;63(11):1205-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.011

(17) Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis [Internet]. 1979;32:51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-024907-0.50013-4

(18) Bes-Rastrollo M, Schulze MB, Ruiz-Canela M, Martinez-Gonzalez MA. Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2013;10(12):e1001578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001578

(19) Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One [Internet]. 2009;4(5):e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738

(20) Gardner W, Lidz CW, Hartwig KC. Authors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials [Internet]. 2005;26(2):244-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2004.11.013

(21) Zhong L, Chen W, Wang T, Zeng Q, Lai L, Lai J, et al. Alcohol and Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses Base on Prospective Cohort Studies. Front Public Health [Internet]. 2022;10:859947. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.859947

(22) Gorowitz S, Maclntyre A. Toward a theory of medical fallibility. J Med Philos [Internet]. 1976;1:51-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/1.1.51

(23) Tonelli MR. Clinical judgement in precision medicine. J Eval Clin Pract [Internet]. 2018;24(3):646-648. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12892

Published

2024-06-06

How to Cite

1.
Estrada-Mesa DA, Higuita-Gutiérrez LF. Two Perceptual Perspectives of Evidence-Based Medicine. Iatreia [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 6 [cited 2025 Dec. 5];37(3). Available from: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/iatreia/article/view/357119

Issue

Section

Respuesta Carta al editor

Most read articles by the same author(s)