World Overview of Scientific Production on Speech Acts: A Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.n83a09Keywords:
speech acts, scientific production, bibliometrics, pragmatics, linguisticsAbstract
The objective of the study is to characterize the world scientific production on speech acts in the Scopus and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to June 2022. For the bibliometric analysis, Bibliometrix R, Publish or Perish v. 8.1, and VOSviewer were used. The results show a higher production in Scopus, while the highest production peaks occurred in the years 2010, 2015. As of 2017, a constant growth in production on the subject is observed.
Downloads
References
Alcaraz, E. (1990). Tres paradigmas de la investigación lingüística. Alcoy.
Asher, N. & Lascarides, A. (2001). Indirect Speech Acts. Synthese, 128(1/2), 183–228. http://www.jstor.org/
stable/20117151
Bazerman, C. (2003). Speech Acts, Genres, and Activity Systems: How Texts Organize Activity and People. In
C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What Writing Does and How It Does It (pp. 315-346). Routledge.
Beebe, L. & Cummings, M. (2009). Natural Speech Act Data Versus Written Questionnaire Data: How
Data Collection Method Affects Speech Act Performance. In S. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech Acts Across
Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language (pp. 65-88). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.
org/10.1515/9783110219289.1.65
Bermúdez, M., García, R. M. & Pedrosa, A. (2021). El sistema entonativo cubano y sus funciones en la
interpretación de los actos de habla interaccionales. Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura, 31(2),
-379. https://doi.org/10.15443/RL3021
Blanco, A. (2008). Cómo hacer cosas malas con palabras: actos ilocucionarios hostiles y los fundamentos de la
teoría de los actos de habla. Crítica, 40(118), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2008.1017
Brodersen, L. (2020). La enseñanza de la cortesía en ELE: actos de habla y tendencias en investigación. Revista
Internacional de Lengua Extranjera, 14. https://doi.org/10.17345/rile14.2997
Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University
Press.
Bucciarelli, M., Colle, L., & Bara, B. G. (2003). How Children Comprehend Speech Acts and Communicative
Gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(2), 207-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00099-1
Cappelen, H. & Lepore, E. (2008). Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act
Pluralism. John Wiley & Sons.
Carr, C. T., Schrock, D. B., & Dauterman, P. (2012). Speech Acts Within Facebook Status Messages. Journal
of Language and Social Psychology, 31(2), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12438535
Chirrey, D.A. (2003), ‘I Hereby Come Out’: What Sort of Speech Act Is Coming Out? Journal of Sociolinguistics,
, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00209
Cohen, A. (2005). Strategies for Learning and Performing L2 Speech Acts. In Intercultural Pragmatics (pp.
-301). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.3.275
Cortés, M. & Arroyo, Y. (2021). Análisis pragmático de los actos de habla irónicos y humorísticos en
comentarios publicados en las páginas de Facebook de cuatro noticieros costarricenses. Texts in Process, 7(1),
-99. https://doi.org/10.17710/tep.2021.7.1.5cortes_arroyo
Cutting, J. & Fordyce, K. (2020). Pragmatics. A Resource Book for Students . Enlarge.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2010). Data Collection Methods in Speech Act Performance. Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical, and Methodological Issues, 26(41), 69-82. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/
books/9789027288363-lllt.26.03fel
Gallardo, S. (2018). Funciones de los actos de habla directivos en el discurso académico. Boletín de
Lingüística, 30(49), 68-85. http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_bl/article/view/15886
Gong, Y., Lyu, B., & Gao, X. (2018). Research on Teaching Chinese as a Second or Foreign Language in and
Outside Mainland China: A Bibliometric Analysis. Asian-Pacific Education Research, 27, 277-289. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s40299-018-0385-2
Haverkate, H. (1994). La cortesía verbal. Estudio pragmalingüístico. Gredos.
Hellbernd, N. & Sammler, D. (2016). Prosody Conveys Speaker’s Intentions: Acoustic Cues for Speech Act
Perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 70-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.01.001
Hernández, M. & Mariottini, L. (2018). Actos de habla y atenuación 2.0: TripAdvisor. CÍRCULO de Lingüística
Aplicada a la Comunicación, 73, 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.59057
Huysmans, J. (2011). What’s in an Act? On Security Speech Acts and Little Security Nothings. Security
Dialogue, 42(4–5), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611418713
Jappe, A., Pithan, D., & Heinze, T. (2018). Does Bibliometric Research Confer Legitimacy to Research
Assessment Practice? A Sociological Study of Reputational Control, 1972-2016. PLOS ONE, 13(6), e0199031.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199031
Jucker, A. H. (2009). Speech Act Research Between Armchair, Field, and Laboratory: The Case Of Compliments.
Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1611-1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004
Jucker, A. H. & Taavitsainen, I. (2000). Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults From Flyting to Flaming.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(1), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
König, E., & Siemund, P. (2007). Speech Act Distinctions in Grammar. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language
Typology and Syntactic Description (pp. 276-324). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/
CBO9780511619427.005
Lei, L. & Liu, D. (2018). Research Trends in Applied Linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A Bibliometric Analysis
and Its Implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy003
Lei, L. & Liao, S. (2017). Publications In Linguistics Journals from Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and
Macau (2003-2012): A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 24(1), 54-64. https://doi.org/1
1080/09296174.2016.1260274
Levinson, S. C. (2017). Speech Acts. In Y. Huang (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 199-216).
Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.22
Li, J. Lei, L., & Cheng, L. (2020). Mapping Evaluation, Appraisal and Stance in Discourse (2000-2015): A
Bibliometric Analysis. Glottotheory, 10(1-2), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2019-0002
Liao, S. & Lei, L. (2017). What We Talk About When We Talk about Corpus: A Bibliometric Analysis of
Corpus Related Research in Linguistics (2000-2015). Glottometrics, 38, 1-20. https://dblp.org/db/journals/glottometrics/glottometrics38.html
Lin, Z. & Lei, L. (2020). The Research Trends of Multilingualism in Applied Linguistics and Education
(2000-2019): A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 12(15), 6058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156058
Meza, P., Sabaj, O. & Matsuda, K. (2017). La autoría única en SciELO Chile: prácticas autoriales en las áreas
de la ciencia. Biblios 66, 11-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2017.332
Peng, Z. & Hu, Z. (2022) A Bibliometric Analysis of Linguistic Research on COVID-19. Frontiers in
Psychology, 13, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005487
Placencia, M. E. & Bravo, D. (2002). Panorámica sobre el estudio de los actos de habla y la cortesía lingüística.
En M. E. Placencia & D. Bravo (Eds.), Actos de habla y cortesía en español (pp. 1-19). Lincom Europa.
Repiso, R. (2020). La autoría: ¿Cuántos firman, quiénes y en qué orden? Revista Comunicar. https://doi.
org/10.3916/escuela-de-autores-121
Restrepo, C. & Urbizagastegui, R. (2018). El método de las palabras asociadas en las metrías aplicadas en
Colombia. Revista Conhecimento em Ação, 3, 3-21. https://doi.org/10.47681/rca.v3i1.16544
Rett, J. (2011). Exclamatives, Degrees and Speech Acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 34, 411–442. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10988-011-9103-8
Reyes, H. (2020). Artículos de revisión. Revista Médica de Chile, 148(1), 103-108. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/
S0034-98872020000100103
Ridao, S. (2020). «Perdona/termine»: Los actos de habla directivos en mediaciones laborales. Verba: Anuario
Galego de Filoloxía, 47, 87-106. https://doi.org/10.15304/verba.47.5725
Ridao, S. (2021). Actos de habla en redes sociales: perfiles privados versus perfiles públicos. Literatura y
Lingüística, 44, 429-446. https://dx.doi.org/10.29344/0717621x.44.2998
Romaní, F. (2020). Análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones científicas originales del Instituto Nacional de
Salud del Perú en el periodo 1998-2018.Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 37(3), 485-
https://doi.org/10.17843/ rpmesp.2020.373.5470
Ruiz de Zarobe, L. (2021). Pragmátoca. Los actos de habla. Octaedro.
Russell, J. M., Jaramillo, M. J. M. & Ainsworth, S. (2009). El análisis de redes en el estudio de la colaboración
científica. Redes. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 17, 39-47. https://raco.cat/index.php/Redes/
article/view/175645.
Searle, J. (1965). What Is a Speech Act? In M. Black (Ed.), Philosophy in America (pp. 221-239). Cornell
University Press.
Sbisà, M. (2002). Speech Acts in Context. Language & Communication, 22(4), 421-436. https://doi.
org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00018-6
Scimago Institutions Rankings (2022). Scimago Journal & Country Rank. https://www.scimagojr.com/
countryrank.php?area=3300&category=3310
Soler, M. & Flecha, R. (2010). Desde los actos de habla de Austin a los actos comunicativos: Perspectivas desde Searle, Habermas y CREA. Revista Signos, 43(2), 363-375. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342010000400007
Taguchi, N. (2007). Task Difficulty in Oral Speech Act Production. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 113-135.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml051
Velásquez, E. & Velásquez, E. (2018). Prosodia de los actos de habla directivos: de los mandatos a los ruegos.
Lenguas Modernas, 48, 105–119. https://lenguasmodernas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/48098
Waltereit, R. (2001). Modal Particles and Their Functional Equivalents: A Speech-Act-Theoretic Approach.
Journal of Pragmatics, 33(9), 1391-1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00057-6
Xia, Z., Liu, F., Deng, Y., & Jhang, S. E. (2022). Mapping Speech Act Studies (2000-2020): A Bibliometric
Analysis. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 22, 55-69. https://doi.org/10.15738/
kjell.22.202201.55
Zhu, J. & Liu, W. (2020). A Tale of Two Databases: The Use of Web of Science and Scopus in Academic
Papers. Scientometrics, 123, 321–335. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lingüística y Literatura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons by-nc-sa
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
1. The journal is the owner of the copyright of the articles, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows third parties to share the work provided its author is indicated and its first publication in this journal.
2. The authors may adopt other agreements of non-exclusive license of distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
3. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work via the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work.
