Variation of craniofacial morphological patterns in class I, II, and III skeletal relationships

Authors

  • Nancy Esperanza Castro-Guevara Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • Joao Víctor Muñoz-Durán Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • Luis Alberto López-Pérez Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • Clementina Infante-Contreras Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Keywords:

Geometric morphometrics, Anatomical landmark, Principal component analysis, Procrustes analysis, Morphology, Biometrics, Discriminant analysis, Cephalometrics, Cluster analysis

Abstract


Introduction: the studies on morphological variations of craniofacial components to classify skeletal relationships have traditionally included univariate and multivariate analysis using variables such as distances, angles, and reference planes. However, these methods fail to explain general changes in shape and provide partial localized descriptions of these relationships. Whereas methods using two- or threedimensional (2D or 3D) Geometric Morphometrics (GM) allow a detailed understanding and a more sensitive test of variables. The objective of this study was to identify morphological pattern variations of the Overall Craniofacial Structure (OCS) in skeletal relationships I, II, and III using GM-2D. Methods: this was a prospective study using non-probability sampling. It implied taking 272 lateral radiographs of the head of Colombian individuals (140 males/132 females) aged 17 to 25 years, determining intra-examiner error and using F-ANOVA as statistic test. Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA) was conducted as well as atypical data detection by Adaptive Quantile. Size variation was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test considering Centroid Size matrix (CS) and conformational differences were analyzed with MANOVA. Craniofacial patterns were identified by Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and K-means/cluster. Results: the OCS showed conformational differences and a good classification capacity of 89% (Class I), 89% (Class II), and 91% (Class III). Four craniofacial patterns were identified; three of them showed
typical skeletal relationships and the other pointed out to a new Class I/II combined group. Conclusions: the morphological differences in the four identified patterns were evident; GM allowed an explanatory display of morphological variation patterns, identifying actual sites where changes in size and shape take place.

|Abstract
= 47 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 28 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nancy Esperanza Castro-Guevara, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

MSc in Dentistry, Universidad Nacional de Colombia School of Dentistry. DMD, Orthodontics Specialist

Joao Víctor Muñoz-Durán, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

PhD in Biology. Associate Professor, Department of Biology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia School of Sciences

Luis Alberto López-Pérez, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

PhD in Statistics. Professor, Department of Statistics, Universidad Nacional de Colombia School of Sciences 

Clementina Infante-Contreras, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

DMD. Orthodontics Specialist, Statistics Specialist. Professor, Universidad Nacional de Colombia School of Dentistry.

References

O’Higgins P, Bastir M, Kupczik K. Shaping the human face. Int Congr 2006; 1296: 55-73.

Bastir M, Rosas A. Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005; 128(1): 26-34.

Szabo-Rogers HL, Smithers LE, Yakob W, Liu KJ. New directions in craniofacial morphogenesis. Dev Biol 2010; 341(1): 84-94.

Bookstein FL. The geometry of craniofacial growth invariants. Am J Orthod 1983; 83(3): 221-234.

Sardi ML, Ramirez Rozzi FV. A cross-sectional study of human craniofacial growth. Ann Hum Bio 2005; 32(3): 390-396.

Pucciarelli HM, Ramirez Rozzi FV, Muñe MC, Sardi ML. Variation of functional cranial components in six Anthropoidea species. Zoology (Jena) 2006; 109(3): 231-243.

Todd JT, Mark LS. Issues related to the prediction of craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod 1981; 79(1): 63-80.

Moss ML, Skalak R, Dasgupta G, Vilmann H. Space, time, and space-time in craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod 1980; 77(6): 591-612.

Buschang PH, Nass GG, Walker GF. Principal components of craniofacial growth for white Philadelphia males and females between 6 and 22 years of age. Am J Orthod 1982; 82(6): 508-512.

Korkhaus G. Disturbances in the development of the upper jaw and the middle face. Am J Orthod 1957; 43(11): 848-868.

Bastir M, Rosas A. Correlated variation between the lateral basicranium and the face: a geometric morphometric study in different human groups. Arch Oral Biol 2006; 51(9): 814-824.

Guyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 1986; 56(1): 7-30.

Bastir M, Sobral PG, Kuroe K, Rosas A. Human craniofacial sphericity: A simultaneous analysis of frontal and lateral cephalograms of a Japanese population using geometric morphometrics and partial least squares analysis. Arch Oral Bio 2008; 53(4): 295-303.

Enlow DH, McNamara JA Jr. The neurocranial basis for facial form and pattern. Angle Orthod 1973; 43(3): 256-270.

Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. The morphological and morphogenetic basis for craniofacial form and pattern. Angle Orthod 1971; 41(3): 161-188.

Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. Intrinsic craniofacial compensations. Angle Orthod 1971; 41(4): 271-285.

Bastir M, Rosas A, Stringer C, Cuétara JM, Kruszynski R, Weber GW et al. Effects of brain and facial size on basicranial form in human and primate evolution. J Hum Evol 2010; 58(5): 424-431.

Allen D, Rebellato J, Sheats R, Ceron AM. Skeletal and dental contributions to posterior crossbites. Angle Orthod 2003; 73(5): 515-524.

Lavelle CLB. A study of craniofacial form. Angle Orthod 1979; 49(1): 65-72.

McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984; 86(6): 449-469.

Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof R. An overview of computerized cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 1972; 61(1): 1-28.

Steiner CC. Cephalometrics In clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959; 29(1): 8-29.

Moyers RE, Bookstein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 1979; 75: 599-617.

McIntyre GT, Mossey PA. Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25(3): 231-242.

Halazonetis DJ. Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125(5): 571-581.

Enlow DH, Pfister C, Richardson E, Kuroda T. An analysis of Black and Caucasian craniofacial patterns. Angle Orthod 1982; 52(4): 279-287.

Van der Molen S, González-José R. Introducción a la morfometría geométrica curso teórico-práctico: Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona, Centro Nacional Patagónico. CENPAT-CONICET; 2007.

Toro M, Manriquez G, Suazo G. Morfometría geométrica y el estudio de las formas biológicas: de la morfología descriptiva a la morfología cuantitativa. Int J Morphol 2010; 28(4): 977-990.

Mitteroecker P, Gunz P. Advances in geometrics morphometrics. Evol Biol 2009 36(2): 235-247.

MetroNukak. Registro: 13-14-374. ed. p. Software multiplataforma de asistencia para el análisis radiológico.

Rahman T, Valdman J. Fast MATLAB assembly of FEM matrices in 2D and 3D: Nodal elements. Appl Math Comput 2013; 219(13): 7151-7158.

Cakirer B, Dean D, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Orthognathic surgery outcome analysis: 3-dimensional lanmark geometric morphometric. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2002; 17(2): 116-132.

Castro N. Modelo de Identificación de patrones del tercio medio facial en clase I, II y III Esquelética: un análisis morfogeométrico. [Trabajo de grado Magister en Odontología] Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2013.

Rohlf FJ. tpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines. 2.16. Department of ecology and evolution. Stony Brook: State University; 2010.

Dujardin J. The MOG software. Version 2, June 1991 ed. Unité de Recherches 062- Unité Mixte de Recherches UMR9926, Institut de Recherches pour le Développement (IRD, France); 2003.

Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA, Somers KM. How many principal components? Stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Comput Stat Data Anal 2005; 49(4): 974-997.

Infante C, López L. Uso de técnicas multivariadas para clasificación de estructuras óseas craneanas. Una aplicación en medicina forense [Trabajo de grado Especialización en Estadística]. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2003.

Ozdemir ST, Ercan I, Ozkaya G, Cankur NS, Erdal YS. Geometric morphometrie study and cluster analysis of late Byzantine and modern human. Coll Antropol 2010; 34(2): 493-499.

Rohlf J. tpsRelw, 1.39. Department of ecology and evolution. Stony Brook: State University; 2008.

Henry A, Thongsripong P, Fonseca-Gonzalez I, Jaramillo-Ocampo N, Dujardin JP. Wing shape of dengue vectors from around the world. Infect Genet Evo 2010; 10(2): 207-214.

Filzmoser P. Identification of multivariate outliers: a performance study. Aust J Stat 2005; 34(2): 127-138.

Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 2001; 4(1): 1-9.

Kimmerle EH, Ross A, Slice D. Sexual dimorphism in America: Geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region. J Forensic Sci 2008; 53(1): 54-57.

Díaz M. Estadística mutivariada: inferencia y métodos. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Departamento de Estadística, Facultad de Ciencias; 2007.

Schaefer K, Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bernhard M, Bookstein FL. Craniofacial sexual dimorphism patterns and allometry among extant hominids. Ann Anat 2004; 186(5-6): 471-478.

Dujardin J. PAD software. Version 2, June 1991 ed. Unité de Recherches 062- Unité Mixte de Recherches UMR9926, Institut de Recherches pour le Développement (IRD, France); 2002.

Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N, Oxnard CE. A geometric morphometric study of sexual dimorphism in the crania of indigenous southern africans. S Afr J Anim Sci 2006; 102(5-6): 229-238.

Akimoto S, Kubota M, Sato S. Increase in vertical dimension and maxillo-mandibular growth in a longitudinal growth sample. J Stomat Occ Med 2010; 3: 15-19.

Singh N, Harvati K, Hublin JJ, Klingenberg CP. Morphological evolution through integration: A quantitative study of cranial integration in Homo, Pan, Gorilla and Pongo. J Hum Evol 2012; 62(1): 155-164.

Published

2015-04-20

How to Cite

Castro-Guevara, N. E., Muñoz-Durán, J. V., López-Pérez, L. A., & Infante-Contreras, C. (2015). Variation of craniofacial morphological patterns in class I, II, and III skeletal relationships. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 26(2), 292–313. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/odont/article/view/16135

Most read articles by the same author(s)