Correlation of the inclination of the incisors to the stability of the alignment of the anterior sector, based on PAR index criteria

Authors

  • Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Ladino Fundación Universitaria CIEO - UNICIEO https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7438-2801
  • Sonia Patricia Plaza-Ruíz Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO
  • Judith Patricia Barrera-Chaparro Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-7241
  • Ivonne Liliana Barrero-Avellaneda Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7283-5256
  • Lizeth Meriño-Brochero Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO
  • Ángela Paola Ramírez-Herrera Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v34n2a1

Keywords:

Incisor, recurrence, orthodontics retainers, index

Abstract

Introduction: the objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between incisor inclination at the end of orthodontic treatment with the anterior teeth alignment stability using PAR index. Methods: analytical cross-sectional study, the angle formed between the plane (Silla-Nasion) (U1-NS) and the inclination of the upper incisor and the angle between axial inclination of the lower incisor and mandibular plane (Go-Gn), were measured in 47 initial and final lateral radiographs of patients who finished orthodontic treatment. The anterior sector PAR index was applied to pretreatment (T0), posttreatment (T1) and follow-up (T2) casts. Statistical analysis was performed using frequency and percentage distributions, T test, Anova I, Anova II and Manova; significance p = 0,05. Results: no association was found between upper and lower incisor inclination, alignment stability and PAR weighted score between T2-T1 (p> 0,05). The PAR decreased 75,29% from T0 to T1 and 58,79% from T0 to T2, with a recurrence of 16,5%. There was no association between retainer type and PAR weighted score. From T0 to T2 there was an association between the interaction of the incisor inclination of upper (p = 0,03) and lower (p = 0,04), with the weighted total score of the PAR index. Conclusion: there was no association between the modification of the incisor inclination with the stability of the anterior sector. At the end of orthodontic treatment there was a high level of correction in the anterior-superior and inferior sector, however, there was a recurrence of 16,5%.

|Abstract
= 410 veces | TABLAS (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces| | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 25 veces| | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces| | VISOR (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 2 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Ladino, Fundación Universitaria CIEO - UNICIEO

Especialista en Ortodoncia. Profesor Auxiliar. Departamento de Ortodoncia. Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO. Bogotá, Colombia

Sonia Patricia Plaza-Ruíz, Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO

Especialista en Ortodoncia. Profesor Asociado. Departamento de Ortodoncia. Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO. Bogotá, Colombia

Judith Patricia Barrera-Chaparro, Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO

Especialista en Ortodoncia. Profesor Asistente. Departamento de Ortodoncia. Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO. Bogotá, Colombia

Ivonne Liliana Barrero-Avellaneda, Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO

Magister en Radiología Oral y Maxilofacial. Departamento de Ortodoncia. Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO. Bogotá, Colombia

Lizeth Meriño-Brochero, Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO

Estudiante de posgrado en Ortodoncia, Fundación Universitaria CIEO – UniCIEO

Ángela Paola Ramírez-Herrera, Fundación Universitaria CIEO-UniCIEO

Estudiante de posgrado en Ortodoncia, Fundación Universitaria CIEO – UniCIEO

References

Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Orthodontic retention: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2006; 33(3): 205-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/146531205225021624

Bjering R, Birkeland K, Vandevska-Radunovic V. Anterior tooth alignment: a comparison of orthodontic retention regimens 5 years posttreatment. Angle Orthod. 2015; 85(3): 353–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/051414-349.1

González-Gil P, Montiel-Company JM, Paredes-Gallardo V, Gandía-Franco JL, Bellot-Arcís C. Orthodontic treatment stability predictors: a retrospective longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 2017; 87(2): 223–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/053116-435.1

Bjering R, Sandvik L, Midtbø M, Vandevska-Radunovic V. Stability of anterior tooth alignment 10 years out of retention. J Orofac Orthop. 2017; 78(4): 275–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-017-0084-2

Canut J. La posición de los incisivos inferiores: formula diagnóstica y fundamentos clínicos. Rev esp ortod. 1999; 29: 3–16.

Greco PM, English JD, Briss BS, Jamieson SA, Kastrop M, Castelein PT et al. Posttreatment tooth movement: for better or for worse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010; 138(5): 552–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.002

Surbeck BT, Artun J, Hawkins NR, Leroux B. Associations between initial, posttreatment, and postretention alignment of maxillary anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113(2): 186-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70291-4

Bondemark L, Holm AK, Hansen K, Axelsson S, Mohlin B, Brattstrom V et al. Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment and patient satisfaction. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77(1): 181-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/011006-16r.1

Johnston CD, Littlewood SJ. Retention in orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2015; 218(3): 119–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.47

Myser SA, Campbell PM, Boley J, Buschang PH. Long-term stability: postretention changes of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013; 144(3): 420–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.004

Loke S. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome: a self-audit using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Malaysian Dent J. 2010; 31(1): 25–34

Ahmad N, Fida M. Othodontic treatment outcome assessment using peer assessment rating (PAR) Index. Pakistan Oral Dent J. 2010; 30(2): 380–7

Taner L, Uzuner FD, Çaylak Y, Gençtürk Z, Kaygısız E. Peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an alternative for orthodontic treatment need decision in relation to angle classification. Turkish J Orthod. 2019; 32(1): 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152%2FTurkJOrthod.2019.18048

Shafique A, Ijaz A, Iqbal S. Assessment of orthodontic treatment by PAR index. Pakistan Oral Dent J. 2018; 38(3): 304–8.

Andrén A, Naraghi S, Mohlin BO, Kjellberg H. Pattern and amount of change after orthodontic correction of upper front teeth 7 years postretention. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80(4): 432-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/090709-506.1

Cansunar HA, Uysal T. Relationship between pretreatment case complexity and orthodontic clinical outcomes determined by the American Board of Orthodontics criteria. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84(6): 974–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/010114-001.1

Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD et al. The development of the PAR Index (peer assessment rating): reability and validity. Eur J Orthod. 1992; 14(2): 125–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/14.2.125

Green JI. An overview of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index for primary dental care practitioners. Prim Dent J. 2016; 5(4): 28–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/205016816820209460

Schütz-Fransson U, Lindsten R, Bjerklin K, Bondemark L. Twelve-year follow-up of mandibular incisor stability: comparison between two bonded lingual orthodontic retainers. Angle Orthod. 2017; 87(2): 200-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/031716-227.1

Remmers D, Van’tHullenaar RWGJ, Bronkhorst EM, Bergé SJ, Katsaros C. Treatment results and long‐term stability of anterior open bite malocclusion. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008; 11(1): 32–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00411.x

Devreese H, De Pauw G, Van Maele G, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Dermaut L. Stability of upper incisor inclination changes in Class II division 2 patients. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29(3): 314-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm011

Lapatki BG, Baustert D, Schulte-Mönting J, Frucht S, Jonas IE. Lip-to-incisor relationship and postorthodontic long-term stability of cover-bite treatment. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(6): 942–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/090205-309

Birkeland K, Furevik J, Bøe OE, Wisth PJ. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index. Eur J Orthod. 1997; 19(3): 279–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/19.3.279

Steinnes J, Johnsen G, Kerosuo H. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome in relation to retention status: an 8- year follow- up. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151(6): 1027-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.032

Wahyudi T, Purwanegara M, Ismah N. Comparison between manual and digital (2d) measurement of peer assessment rating (PAR) score index (Component 1-6). J Int Dent Medical Res. 2017; 10(1): 59–64.

Eslavath SN, Mood TN, Narahari KSA, Chekka M, Natta S. Evaluation of treatment changes produced by different orthodontic treatment modalities using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. J Dr NTR Univ Heal Sci. 2015; 4(2): 97-2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-8632.158584

Published

2022-09-13

How to Cite

Rodriguez-Ladino, J. C., Plaza-Ruíz, S. P., Barrera-Chaparro, J. P., Barrero-Avellaneda, I. L., Meriño-Brochero, L., & Ramírez-Herrera, Ángela P. (2022). Correlation of the inclination of the incisors to the stability of the alignment of the anterior sector, based on PAR index criteria. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v34n2a1

Most read articles by the same author(s)