Depth and proximity of third molars to the inferior alveolar canal in panoramic radiographs of a Latin American population

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v35n2a5

Keywords:

Radiography panoramic, Molar third, mandible, adult

Abstract

Introduction: extraction of lower third molars involve the possible occurrence of complications such as injury of the content of the Inferior Alveolar Canal. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 6488 lower molar records of digital panoramic radiographs of patients from 6 Latin American countries from 2010-2015. The variables studied were the depth of lower third molar according to the Pell and Gregory classification, and the proximity of a third molar to the Inferior Alveolar Canal that was evaluated according to the proposed classification, based on a modification of the Langlais et al classification.20 Descriptive and bivariate statistical analyses were performed. Results: in terms of the proximity, the highest frequency was Intact with 27.45%(n=1781). Regarding the depth of the lower third molar, the most frequent were the Position B with 46.90%(n=3043) and Position A with 46.75%(n=3033). The proximity and depth of the lower third molar had statistical difference according to age(p<0.01) and sex (p<0.001). The overall proximity of the lower third molar to the Inferior alveolar canal, according to depth was 37.52%(n=1766) in Position A, in Position B it was 54.51%(n=2566) and Position C was 7.97%(n=375) and had association between variables(p<0.001). Conclusions: taking into consideration the modified classification of Langlais et al.20, lower third molars are close to the Inferior Alveolar Canal, and according to the Pell and Gregory classification for the depth, the most frequent positions are A and B. In addition, proximity and depth were associated with each other, and with the co-variables country, age, and sex.

|Abstract
= 154 veces | PDF
= 126 veces| | HTML
= 6 veces| | VISOR
= 2 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

María Claudia Garcés-Elias, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Master of Business Administration (MBA). Academic Department of Social Dentistry, Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.

Roberto Antonio León-Manco, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

MPH, Professor, Academic Department of Social Dentistry, Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.

Jorge Arturo Beltrán-Silva, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

PhD. Estomatology. Academic Department of Social Dentistry, Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.

References

Santiago BM, Almeida L, Cavalcanti YW, Magno MB, Maia LC. Accuracy of the third molar maturity index in assessing the legal age of 18 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Legal Med. 2018; 132(4): 1167-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1766-4

Hasan KM, Sobhana CR, Rawat SK, Singh D, Mongia P, Fakhruddin A. Third molar impaction in different facial types and mandibular length: a cross-sectional study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 12(1): 83-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_111_20

Candotto V, Oberti L, Gabrione F, Scarano A, Rossi D, Romano M. Complication in third molar extractions. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019; 33(3 Suppl. 1): 169-72.

Altan A, Akbulut N. Does the angulation of an impacted mandibular third molar affect the prevalence of preoperative pathoses? J Dent (Shiraz). 2019; 20(1): 48-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2019.44563

Sureshkannan P, Samthomas K, Ravikumar PT, Thangavelu A, Karthik RM, Thiruneelakanadan S. Reliability of orthopantamogram in lower third molar surgery: inter- and intra-observer agreement. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020; 12(Suppl 1): S190-S193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_57_20

Kaur R, Kumar AC, Garg R, Sharma S, Rastogi T, Gupta VV. Early prediction of mandibular third molar eruption/impaction using linear and angular measurements on digital panoramic radiography: a radiographic study. Indian J Dent. 2016; 7(2): 66-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-962x.184644

Ouassime K, Rachid A, Amine K, Ousmane B, Faiçal S. The wisdom behind the third molars removal: a prospective study of 106 cases. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 68: 102639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.amsu.2021.102639

Hounsome J, Pilkington G, Mahon J, Boland A, Beale S, Kotas E, et al. Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2020; 24(30): 1-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24300

Daware SN, Balakrishna R, Deogade SC, Ingole YS, Patil SM, Naitam DM. Assessment of postoperative discomfort and nerve injuries after surgical removal of mandibular third molar: a prospective study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021; 10(4): 1712-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_280_19

Alexoudi VA, Tatsis D, Zamani K, Zelkas D, Paraskevopoulos K, Vaxtsevanos K. Iatrogenic displacement of impacted mandibular third molars or their roots into adjacent soft tissues and spaces: a report of three cases. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 11(2): 275-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_95_19

Na JY, Han SS, Jeon K, Choi YJ, Choi SH, Lee C. Prognosis in case of nerve disturbance after mandibular implant surgery in relation to computed tomography findings and symptoms. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019; 49(2): 127-35. DOI:

Elkhateeb SM, Awad SS. Accuracy of panoramic radiographic predictor signs in the assessment of proximity of impacted third molars with the mandibular canal. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2018; 13(3): 254-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.02.006

Yue Yi EK, Siew Ying AL, Mohan M, Menon RK. Prevalence of postoperative infection after tooth extraction: a retrospective study. Int J Dent. 2021; 2021: 6664311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6664311

La Monaca G, Vozza I, Giardino R, Annibali S, Pranno N, Cristalli MP. Prevention of neurological injuries during mandibular third molar surgery: technical notes. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8(2): 45-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11138%2Fads%2F2017.8.2.053

Su N, van Wijk A, Berkhout E, Sanderink G, De Lange J, Wang H, et al. Predictive value of panoramic radiography for injury of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75(4): 663-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.12.013

Manor Y, Abir R, Manor A, Kaffe I. Are different imaging methods affecting the treatment decision of extractions of mandibular third molars? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017; 46(1): 20160233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259%2Fdmfr.20160233

Patel PS, Shah JS, Dudhia BB, Butala PB, Jani YV, Macwan RS. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation. Indian J Dent Res. 2020; 31(1): 91-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_540_18

Patil V, Pai KM, Vineetha R, Rajagopal KV, Dkhar W. Comparison of conventional techniques and higher imaging modalities in the evaluation of relation between the third molar and inferior alveolar nerve canal: a pilot study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019; 10(1): 93-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fccd.ccd_430_18

Pell GJ, Gregory GT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified technique for removal. Dent Dig. 1933; 39(9): 330‐8.

Langlais RP, Langland OE, Nortjé CJ. Diagnostic imaging of the jaws. 1era ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.

Derafshi A, Sarikhani K, Mirhosseini F, Baghestani M, Noorbala R, Kaboodsaz Yazdi M. Evaluation of the course of inferior alveolar canal and its relation to anatomical factors on digital panoramic radiographs. J Dent (Shiraz). 2021; 22(3): 213-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2020.87973.1304

Chaudhary B, Joshi U, Dahal S, Sagtani A, Khanal P, Bhattarai N. Anatomical position of lower third molar in relation to mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography images in a tertiary care hospital: a descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020; 58(231): 879-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5314

Barone R, Clauser C, Testori T, Del Fabbro M. Self-assessed neurological disturbances after surgical removal of impacted lower third molar: a pragmatic prospective study on 423 surgical extractions in 247 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23(8): 3257-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2747-9

Huang CK, Lui MT, Cheng DH. Use of panoramic radiography to predict postsurgical sensory impairment following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. J Chin Med Assoc. 2015; 78(10): 617–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2015.01.009

Jaron A, Trybek G. The pattern of mandibular third molar impaction and assessment of surgery difficulty: a retrospective study of radiographs in East Baltic Population. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18: 6016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph18116016

Yilmaz S, Adisen MZ, Misirlioglu M, Yorubulut S. Assessment of third molar impaction pattern and associated clinical symptoms in a Central Anatolian Turkish Population. Med Princ Pract. 2016; 25(2): 169-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000442416

Deshpande P, V Guledgud M, Patil K. Proximity of impacted mandibular third molars to the inferior alveolar canal and its radiographic predictors: a panoramic radiographic study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013; 12(2): 145-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-012-0409-z

Kang F, Sah MK, Fei G. Determining the risk relationship associated with inferior alveolar nerve injury following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: a systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 121(1): 63-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.06.010

Rytkönen K, Ventä I. Distance between mandibular canal and third molar root among 20-year-old subjects. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22(7): 2505-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2346-9

Selvi F, Dodson TB, Nattestad A, Robertson K, Tolstunov L. Factors that are associated with injury to the inferior alveolar nerve in high-risk patients after removal of third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 51(8): 868-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.08.007

Reia VCB, Telles-Araujo GT, Peralta-Mamani M, Biancardi MR, Rubira CMF, Rubira-Bullen IRF. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT compared to panoramic radiography in predicting IAN exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25(8): 4721–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03942-4

Published

2023-09-14

How to Cite

Garcés-Elias, M. C., León-Manco, R. A., & Beltrán-Silva, J. A. (2023). Depth and proximity of third molars to the inferior alveolar canal in panoramic radiographs of a Latin American population. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 35(2), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v35n2a5