El mindfulness como tecnología para el desarrollo de la inteligencia emocional. Aplicación a la conciliación en línea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.e348558Palabras clave:
mindfulness, tecnología , inteligencia emocional , conciliación en línea , realismo integralResumen
El mindfulness es tema de creciente interés en diferentes disciplinas por sus aportes potenciales al desarrollo de la inteligencia emocional. Este artículo de revisión analiza el lugar del mindfulness en las tecnologías referidas en publicaciones del ámbito de la conciliación en línea como Mecanismo Alternativo para la Solución de Conflictos. Desde el marco del realismo integral, se recurrió a la revisión integrativa y a la técnica cualitativa de Síntesis Interpretativa Crítica como metodología de análisis. Los resultados muestran que, de 50 publicaciones analizadas, solo 2 hacen mención implícita de la aplicación del mindfulness; por lo que se concluye que en este subcampo de conocimiento predomina la aplicación de tecnologías computacionales. Estas, aunque demandan mayores niveles de inteligencia emocional, no consideran aún en su corpus asuntos como la autoconsciencia, la autorregulación y la empatía, cuyo adecuado desarrollo requiere tecnologías complementarias a las computacionales, provenientes de la medicina, la psicología y la filosofía.
Descargas
Citas
Abedi, F., Zeleznikow, J. & Belluci, E. 2019). Universal standards for the concept of trust in online dispute resolution systems in e–commerce disputes. International Journal of Law and Infomation Technology, 27(3), 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaz005
Abedi, F., Zeleznikow, J. & Brien, C. (2019). Developing regulatory standards for the concept of security in online dispute resolution systems. Computer Law & Security Review, 35(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.05.003
Abrahams, B. Bellucci, E. & Zeleznikow, J. (2012). Incorporating fairness into development of an integrated multi-agent online dispute resolution environment. Group Decision and Negotiation, 21, 3-28.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726–010–9189–3
Andrade, F., Novais P., Carneiro D., Zeleznikow J. & Neves J. (2010). Using batnas and watnas in online dispute resolution. En Nakakoji, K., Murakami, Y. & McCready, E. (eds.). New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 5-18). Springer.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55619486.pdf
Augar, N. & Zeleznikow J. (2013). Developing online support and counseling to enhance family dispute resolution in Australia. Group Decision and Negotiation, 23, 515-532. https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v23y2014i3d10.1007_s10726–013–9352–8.html
Barral-Viñals, I. (2017). Consumer “Access to Justice” in eu in low-value cross-border disputes and the role of online dispute resolution. En C. Jiménez-Gómez & M. Gascó-Hernández (eds.), Achieving Open Justice Through Citizen Participation and Transparency (pp. 191-208). igi Global.
http://doi:10.4018/978–1–5225–0717–8.ch010
Bellucci, E., Venkatraman, S. & Stranieri, A. (2019). Online dispute resolution in mediating ehr disputes: a case study on the impact of emotional intelligence. Behaviour & Information Techonology, 39(10), 1124–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1645209
Benson, H., Beary, J. y Carol, M. (1974) The relaxation response. Psychiatry, 37(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1974.11023785
Biard, A. (2019). Justice en ligne ou nouveau Far Www.est? Revue internationale de droit économique, xxxiii, 165–191. https://doi.org/10.3917/ride.332.0165
Bustamante-Rúa, M., Ángel-Muñoz, S., Giraldo-Aristizábal, J. & Marín-Tapiero, J. (2020). Online dispute resolution, alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and artificial intelligence for descongesting the administration of justice. Law, State and Telecommunications Review, 12(1), 77—112. https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v12i1.25808
Carneiro, D., Novais, P., Andrade, F., Zeleznikow, J. & Neves, J. (2014). Online dispute resolution: An artificial intelligence perspective. Artificial Intelligence Review, 41, 211–240.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462–011–9305–z
Carvajal, Y. (2010). Interdisciplinariedad: desafío para la educación superior y la investigación. Revista Luna Azul, 31(31), 156–169. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/luaz/n31/n31a11.pdf
Casanovas, P. & Zeleznikow, J. (2014). Online dispute resolution and models of relational law and justice: A table of ethical principles. En Casanovas, P., Pagallo, U., Palmirani, M. & Sartor, G. (eds.). ai Approaches to the Complexity of legal Systems (pp. 54–68). Aicol, 2013. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–662–45960–7_5
Casey, T. & Wilson–Evered, E. (2012). Predicting uptake of technology innovations in online family dispute resolution services. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2034–2045.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.022
Clifford, D. & Shin, V. (2016). Online dispute resolution: Settling data protection disputes in a digital world of customers. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(2), 272–285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.12.014
Cortés, P. (2011). Developing Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the eu. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 19(1), 1–28.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaq011
Cortés, P. (2013). Directive 2013/11/eu on alternative dispute resolution for consumers and regulation (ec) 524/2013 on online dispute resolution. En Lodder, A. & Murray, A. (eds.). eu Regulation of E–commerce (pp. 230–255). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781785369339/9781785369339.00016.xml
Cortés, P. & Lodder, A. (2014). Consumer dispute resolution goes online: Reflections on the evolution of European law for out– of– court redress. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 21, 14–38. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2414098}
D’Angelo, L. (2012). A comparison between American and Italian online dispute resolution systems. En Bathia, K., Candlin, C. & Gotti, M. (comps.). Discourse and practice in international commercial arbitration (pp. 209–224). Ashgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290753991_A_comparison_between_American_and_Italian_online_dispute_resolution_systems
Dixon–Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D., Miller, T., Sutton, A., Shaw, R., Smith, J. y Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A Critical perspective. Qualitative Research: qr, 6(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867
Díez, D. (2022). Aprender a di–sentir. El mindfulness como virtud en la toma de decisiones ética. Centro Editorial ucm.
Díez, D. y Romero–Cárdenas, R. M. (2021). Conocimiento sobre las aplicaciones del mindfulness a la mediación de conflictos: revisión bibliográfica mixta. Revista Jurídicas, 18(2), 103–125.
https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2021.18.2.7
Ebner, N. & Zeleznikow, J. (2016). No sheriff in town: Governance for online dispute resolution. Negotiation Journal, 32(4), 297–323.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12161
Fersini, E., Messina, V., Manenti, L., Bagnara, G., El Jelali, S. & Arosio. G. (2014). eMediation: Towards smart online dispute resolution. International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing, 228–236. https://www.scitepress.org/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0005080002280236
Foucault, M. (2003). Historia de la sexualidad 3. La inquietud de sí. Siglo xxi editores.
Foucault, M. (1990). Tecnologías del yo y otros textos afines. Paidós.
Gabris, T. (2018). Heading towards online dispute resolution in the slovak republic. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 1, 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2018.59.1.5
Goleman, D. (2010). Inteligencia emocional. Kairós.
González, W. (2019). Online dispute resolution: The issues in private international law. Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional, 13, 187–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2638471
Harris, A. (2012). Toward lawyering as peacemaking. Journal of Legal Education, 61(4), 647–653. https://jle.aals.org/home/vol61/iss4/8/
Hassan, R., Khan, H., Alshaikhli, I. & Hak, N. (2013). Setting–up a sulh–based, community mediation–type of online dispute resolution (odr) in Malaysia. 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World. Rabat, Morocco.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT4M.2013.6518876
Ibri, I. A. (2006). The heuristic exclusivity of abduction in peirce’s philosophy. In R. Fabbrichesi & S. Marietti (Eds.), Semiotics and Philosophy in C. S. Peirce.Cambridge Scholars Press.
Kabat–Zinn, J. (2009). Vivir con plenitud las crisis (3ª ed.). Kairós.
Katsh, E. y Rifkin, J. (2001). Online dispute resolution. Resolving conflict in cyberspace. Jossey–Bass.
Kou, H., Bi, T., Chen, S., Li, X., He, Y., Xie, Q. y He, J. (2022). The impact of mindfulness training on supportive communication, emotional intelligence, and human caring among nursing students. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.13093
López, C. y Baniandrés, N. (2013). El principio de parsimonia en la ciencia cognitiva actual. Ciencia cognitiva, 7(2), 28–30. http://www.cienciacognitiva.org/files/2013–10.pdf
Mania, K. (2015). Online dispute resolution: The future of justice. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 1(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.006
Marshall, P. (2012). Toward an integral realism. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 7(4), 1–34. http://waltwhitmanmeditation.com/wp–content/uploads/2017/01/jitp–whitman.pdf#page=10
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P. & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1503_02
Menezes, A., Mocheva, N. & Shankar, S. (2020). Under pressure: Integrating online dispute resolution platforms into pre–insolvency prosses and early warning tools to save distressed small businesses. Vikalpa The Journal for Decision Makers,
(2), 79–92.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0256090920941813
Mnookin, R. (2000). Beyond winning. Harvard University Press.
Nadler, R., Carswell, J. y Minda, J. (2020). Online mindfulness training increases well–being, trait emotional intelligence, and workplace competency ratings: A randomized waitlist–controlled trial. Frontiers in psychology, (11), 1–19 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00255
Nava, W. (2017). Problemas de ejecución en el marco de los sistemas extrajudiciales de resolución de conflictos en línea. Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, 19(149), 837–861.
http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041–86332017000200837
Nava, W. & Ortega, G. (2019). Análisis crítico de la plataforma europea de resolución de conflictos en línea. Revista de los Estudios de Derecho y Ciencia Política, 29, 1–15.
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7329216
Netto, J. L., Fogaca, A. R. & Garcel, A. (2020). Autocompositive methods and new technologies in covid 19–times. Relacoes Internacionais No Mundo Atual, 1(26), 21–32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v2i27.3989
Ojiaco, U., Chipulu, M., Marshall, A. & Terry, W. (2017). An examination of the ‘rule of law’ and ‘justice’ implications in online dispute resolution in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.10.002
Ortalini, P. (2015). Self–enforcing online dispute resolution. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 36(3), 595–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqv036
Oseni, U. & Omoola, S. (2015). Banking on ict: The relevance of online dispute resolution in the Islamic banking industry in Malaysia. Information & Communications Technology Law, 24(2), 205–223.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2015.1067968
Oseni, U. & Omoola, S. (2017). Prospects of an online dispute resolution framework for Islamic banks in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 25(1), 39–55.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC–07–2016–0055
Oseni, U., Adeyemi-Adewale, A. & Omoola, S. (2018). The feasibility of online dispute resolution in the Islamic banking industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(1), 34–54.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA–06–2016–0057
Osna, G. (2019). Acceso a la justicia, cultura y online dispute resolution. Derecho pucp, 83, 9–27. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201902.001
Palanissamy, A. & Kesavamoorhy, R. (2019). Automated Dispute Resolution System (adrs)– A proposed initial framework for digital justice in online consumer transactions in India. Procedia Computer Science, 165, 224–231.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050920300958
Prince, S. (2020). Encouragement of mediation in England and Wales has been futile. International Journal of Law in Context, 16(2), 181–196.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552320000130
Purser, R. E. (2019). McMindfulness. Repeater Books.
Riskin, L. (2004). Mindfulness: Foundational training for dispute resolution. Journal of Legal Education, 54(1), 79–90. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/636
Salcido, L., Ramos, N., Jiménez, Ó. y Blanca, M. (2019). Mindfulness to regulate emotions: The mindfulness and emotional intelligence program (pinep) and its adaptation to a virtual learning platform. Complementary therapies in clinical practice, 36, 176–180.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.07.003
Sampani, C. (2021). Online dispute resolution in e–commerce. Information & Communications Technology Law, 30(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13 600834.2021.1875539
Saunders, D. & Reedy, A. (2013). Understanding our present: Teaching disputes resolution through online role–play. 30th Annual Conference on Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. (pp. 796–800). Charles Darwin
University.
https://espace.cdu.edu.au/eserv/cdu:40228/Saunders_40228.pdf
Sellars, J. (2018). Roman stoic mindfulness: An ancient technology of the Self. En M. Dennis & S. Werkhoven (eds.). Ethics and Self–Cultivation (pp. 15–29). Routledge.
Šimková, N. (2015). A literature review on online dispute resolution and application to B2B e-commerce. 23 Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks. (p.p. 247–254). Universidad Técnica de Košice, 9–11 September.
Šimková, N. & Smutny, Z. (2016). Conceptual design of online dispute resolution in B2B relationships. 24 Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks. (pp. 303–310). Czech Republic, 7–9 september. Linz: Trauner Verlag.
Šimková, N. & Smutny, Z. (2017). Satisfaction assessment with the process and result of online dispute resolution in B2B relationships. 12th International Conference on Strategic Management and its Support by Information Systems. (pp.
–127). Czech Republic, 25–26 May. Ostrava: všb – Technical University of Ostrava. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318317081_Satisfaction_Assessment_with_the_Process_and_Result_of_Online_Dispute_Resolution_in_B2B_Relationships
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, (14), 333–339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039}
Suquet, J., Poblet, M., Noriega, P. & Gabarró, S. (2011). Online dispute resolution in 2010: A cyberspace odyssey? 6th International workshop on online dispute resolution 2010. (pp. 1–16). Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Thomson, M. (2011). Alternative modes of delivery for family dispute resolution. Journal of family studies, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.2011.17.3.253
Van Den Herik, J. & Dimov, D. (2011). Towards crowdsourced online dispute resolution. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 7, 99–111.
https://www.neliti.com/publications/28681/towards–crowdsourced–online–dispute–resolution
Viera, R. F., Rule, C., Ono, T. T. & Bitelho, G. E. (2018). The expansion of online dispute resolution in Brazi. International Journal for Court Administration, 9(2),20–30.
http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.255
Wierzbicki, 2015. What is ‘‘technology’’? En Technen: Elements of Recent History of Information Technologies (pp. 31–55). Springer.
https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/what–is–technology/2200778
Wiles, K. (2022). Mindfulness meditation as “good medicine”: A new epistemological pluralism in health care. Social Theory and Health. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285–022–00180–w
Wing, L., Martínez, J., Katsh, E. & Rule, C (2021). Negotiation Journal, 37(1), 49–64. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nejo.12350
Xue, J. & Holz, R. (2019). Applying smart contracts in online dispute resolutions on a large scale and its regulatory implications. En Ragnedda, M. y G. Destefanis, Blockchain and Web 3.0 (pp. 177–191). Routledge.
Zeleznikow, J. (2017). Can artificial intelligence and online dispute resolution enhance efficiency and effectiveness in courts? International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 30–45.
http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.223
Zeleznikow, J. & Bellucci, E. (2010). Using asset divider to investigate the Israel– Palestinian dispute. 6th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution (pp.37–50). Liverpool, United Kingdom.
http://ceur–ws.org/Vol–684/paper4.pdf
Zeleznikow, J. & Bellucci, E. (2011). Classifying online dispute resolution through a comparison of family mediation and the Israel–Palestinian conflict. 13a International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 136–140). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018379
Zizek, S. (26 de noviembre de 2012). The Irony of Buddhism. European Graduate School Lecture [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kwm_dR–XMSY
Zulfugazade, T. E., Tsirina, M. A. & Semikyna, O. I. (2020). Improvement of legal groundwork for the online dispute resolution system. En Popkova, E. & Sergi, B. (eds.). isc Conference – Volgograd 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1100. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–030–39319–9_87
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los textos enviados para evaluación en la Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia, no deben estar publicados previamente, ni aceptados para su publicación futura en otra revista.
Al aceptarse los envíos para la publicación en la Revista, el autor cederá parcialmente sus derechos, conservando su uso no-comercial y el derecho de circulación académica como archivo de acceso libre.
Excepto que se establezca de otra forma, el contenido de esta revista cuenta con una licencia Creative Commons "reconocimiento, no comercial-compartir igual" Colombia 4.0, que puede consultarse aquí.
Para más información revisar las Políticas editoriales.
