The probatory flexibility in the procedure of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.14149Keywords:
Inter-American Court of Human Rights, procedural disadvantages, due process, Human Rights, procedural efficientism, probatory activity, probatory freedomAbstract
In the process that is conducted in face of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights some particularities has been observed: the freedom in the evidence, the evidence valuation, the practice and the charge in the evidence, that establish the facts, therefore not fundament in a empiric evidence, if not in components of programmatic type, like presumptions and fictions of the called circumstantial evidence, which to ask: is reasonable and compatible with the due process, in order to guarantee, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, brings so biggest liberties in the obtaining an the appreciation of the evidence, the same in the generation of disadvantage values when the State has been demanded, during the processes developed in this Court? This paper has a finality to make a study of the probatory activity in the processes developed before the Court, contrasting those characteristics with the due process principles, to establish if with that the procedural guarantees of the parts are affected.
Downloads
References
ABREU BURELLI, Alirio, “La prueba en los procesos ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos”, colaboración para la obra colectiva El Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los Derechos Humanos en el Umbral del Siglo XXI, San José de Costa Rica, 2003.
ACOSTA ALVARADO, Paola Andrea. Tribunal Europeo y Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos: ¿Escenarios idóneos para la garantía del derecho de acceso a la justicia internacional? Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia. 2008.148 páginas.
BARBOSA DELGADO, Francisco, Perspectiva Jurídica del Sistema de protección de Derechos Humanos, Bogotá, 2002, Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Páginas 661.
BERNAL PULIDO, Carlos. El derecho fundamental del debido proceso. Medellín, Colombia. Señal Editora, 2004. 83 Páginas.
FIX-ZAMUDIO, Héctor. “Orden y valoración de las pruebas en la Función Contenciosa de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos”, colaboración para la obra colectiva El Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los Derechos Humanos en el Umbral del Siglo XXI, San José de Costa Rica, T, I.
GARCÍA RAMÍREZ, Sergio. El acceso de la víctima a la jurisdicción internacional sobre derechos humanos. En: El acceso a la justicia, entre el derecho formal y el derecho alternativo. El otro derecho. No. 35. ILSA. Bogotá. 2006. 7-55 Páginas.
NOVAK TALAVERA, F y GARCÍA CORROCHANO, L. Derecho internacional público, Tomo II, volumen 2: sujetos de derecho internacional. Fondo editorial del instituto de estudios internacionales de la Pontificia Universidad católica del Perú, 2002. Páginas 528
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Estudios de Derecho is governed by the following regulation: Political Constitution of Colombia, article 61; Law 23 of 1982, articles 1 and 2; Law 44 of 1993, chapter II, article 6 and chapter IV, article 51; Law 599 of 2000 through which the Penal Code is issued, articles 270, 271 and 272. In addition, the journal is governed by the guidelines of the National Copyright Directorate and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for Colombia. Finally, it abides by Rectoral Resolution 21231 of 5 August, 2005, through which the Statute on Intellectual Property is issued.
Authors who publish in Estudios de Derecho continue to retain their rights, however, they should bear in mind that the contents of the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike license. In this sense, The material created may be distributed, copied and exhibited by third parties if they credit it. No commercial benefit can be obtained.
