Comparative in vitro evaluation of a biosimilar enoxaparin candidate and its reference product

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v32n3a361315

Keywords:

Biosimilar, Enoxaparin, Anticoagulation, Low molecular weight heparin, Thromboelastometry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, has been widely used to prevent and treat thromboembolic disorders. Following the expiration of the patent of the reference product, biosimilar alternatives were developed, requiring thorough comparability assessments to ensure efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro pharmacodynamic and structural properties of Biotexin® and the reference product Clexane®. METHODS: The products were evaluated using anti-FXa chromogenic assays, clot-based tests (aPTT, TT), and whole-blood thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Structural analyses included molecular weight profiling and USP potency determination. RESULTS: Biotexin® showed anti-FXa activity comparable to that of Clexane®, with overlapping EC₅₀ confidence intervals. No statistically significant differences were observed in aPTT or TT assays (P = 0.499 and P = 0.538, respectively). ROTEM analysis confirmed a significant prolongation of clotting time (CT) and clot formation time (CFT) compared to the control (P = 0.0043 and P = 0.0064, respectively), with no differences between the two products. Molecular weight distribution and USP potency were also comparable. CONCLUSION: These findings confirm the in vitro biosimilarity between Biotexin® and the reference product, supporting their functional equivalence and justifying further pharmacokinetic and clinical studies to establish therapeutic interchangeability.

|Abstract
= 184 veces | PDF
= 106 veces| | EPUB
= 10 veces| | GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
= 9 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrés F. Zuluaga, Universidad de Antioquia

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

LIME Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Ivone Jiménez Toro, Universidad de Antioquia

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

LIME Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Andrés Hincapie, Universidad de Antioquia

LIME Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

References

Ingle RG, Agarwal AS. A world of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) enoxaparin as a promising moiety—A review. Carbohydr Polym 2014;106:148–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.100.

Sultana R, Kamihira M. Multifaceted Heparin: Diverse Applications beyond Anticoagulant Therapy. Pharmaceuticals 2024;17:1362. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101362.

Saxena S, Chaudhary M, Chaudhary S, Aggarwal A. Bioequivalence of a biosimilar enoxaparin ( CLOTI‐XATM ) and its innovator (Clexane® ): a single‐dose , randomized, double‐blind , two‐period , two‐treatment , two‐sequence , crossover, balanced study in healthy human subjects. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2022;10:e00979. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.979.

Dziri C, Ben Hmida W, Dougaz W, Khalfallah M, Samaali I, Jerraya H, et al. Biosimilar versus branded enoxaparin to prevent postoperative venous thromboembolism after surgery for digestive tract cancer: Randomized trial. PLOS ONE 2023;18:e0293269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293269.

Ramacciotti E, Ferreira U, Costa AJV, Raymundo SRO, Correa JA, Neto SG, et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Biosimilar Versus Branded Enoxaparin in the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blinded, Multicenter Clinical Trial. Clin Appl Thromb 2018;24:1208–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029618786583.

Fantoni C, Bertù L, Faioni EM, Froiio C, Mariani N, Ageno W. Safety and effectiveness of biosimilar enoxaparin (Inhixa) for the prevention of thromboembolism in medical and surgical inpatients. Intern Emerg Med 2021;16:933–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02536-4.

Gherghescu I, Delgado-Charro MB. The Biosimilar Landscape: An Overview of Regulatory Approvals by the EMA and FDA. Pharmaceutics 2020;13:48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010048.

Iqbal Z, Sadaf S. Commercial Low Molecular Weight Heparins — Patent Ecosystem and Technology Paradigm for Quality Characterization. J Pharm Innov 2023;18:803–35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-022-09665-7.

Mielke J, Jilma B, Jones B, Koenig F. An update on the clinical evidence that supports biosimilar approvals in Europe. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2018;84:1415–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13586.

Qneibi D, Ramacciotti E, Macedo AS, Caffaro RA, Agati LB, Siddiqui F, et al. Comparative Studies on the Anticoagulant Profile of Branded Enoxaparin and a New Biosimilar Version. Clin Appl Thromb 2020;26:1076029620960820. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029620960820.

Berkovskii AL, Sergeeva EV, Chernobrovkin MG, Zinchenko AV. Comparative Analysis of Two Enoxaparin Sodium Drugs by Heptest. Pharm Chem J 2023;56:1407–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-023-02805-4.

Bertini S, Bisio A, Torri G, Bensi D, Terbojevich M. Molecular Weight Determination of Heparin and Dermatan Sulfate by Size Exclusion Chromatography with a Triple Detector Array. Biomacromolecules 2005;6:168–73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049693s.

Bisio A, Mantegazza A, Vecchietti D, Bensi D, Coppa A, Torri G, et al. Determination of the Molecular Weight of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins by Using High-Pressure Size Exclusion Chromatography on Line with a Triple Detector Array and Conventional Methods. Molecules 2015;20:5085–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20035085.

Pehlivan M, Pehlivan M, Ceylan C, Alisik M, Yis O, Bugdayci G. Analytical Performance Evaluation of Siemens Sysmex CS-2500 and Sekisui CP-3000. Clin Lab 2022;68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210606.

Yis OM, Bugdayci G, Pehlivan MB, Yildiz RN, Alisik M. Analytical performance evaluation of Sysmex CS-2500 and Stago STA Compact. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2020;31:324–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000000920.

Schaden E, Schober A, Hacker S, Spiss C, Chiari A, Kozek-Langenecker S. Determination of enoxaparin with rotational thrombelastometry using the prothrombinase-induced clotting time reagent. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2010;21:256–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0b013e328337014c.

Zuluaga AF, Agudelo M, Rodriguez CA, Vesga O. Application of microbiological assay to determine pharmaceutical equivalence of generic intravenous antibiotics. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2009;9:1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-9-1.

Sanchez‐Pena P, Hulot J, Urien S, Ankri A, Collet J, Choussat R, et al. Anti‐factor Xa kinetics after intravenous enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a population model analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005;60:364–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02452.x.

Declerck P, Farouk Rezk M. The road from development to approval: evaluating the body of evidence to confirm biosimilarity. Rheumatology 2017;56:iv4–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex279.

Jeske W, McGeehan E, Iqbal O, Hoppensteadt D, Walenga JM, Fareed J. Comparison of Branded Enoxaparin (Lovenox) and a Biosimilar Version of Enoxaparin (Fibrinox). Blood 2010;116:4385–4385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V116.21.4385.4385.

Walenga JM, Jeske WP, Hoppensteadt D, Cunanan J, Khan H, Escalante V, et al. Comparative Studies on Branded Enoxaparin and a US Generic Version of Enoxaparin. Clin Appl Thromb 2013;19:261–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029612463427.

Pavoni V, Gianesello L, Conti D, Ballo P, Dattolo P, Prisco D, et al. “In Less than No Time”: Feasibility of Rotational Thromboelastometry to Detect Anticoagulant Drugs Activity and to Guide Reversal Therapy. J Clin Med 2022;11:1407. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051407.

Czempik PF, Beberok A. Effect of prophylactic doses of enoxaparin on antifactor Xa activity confirmed by rotational thromboelastometry in critically ill patients: a preliminary prospective cohort study. Front Pharmacol 2025;15:1498188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1498188.

Brouwers JRBJ, Roeters Van Lennep JE, Beinema MJ. Biosimilars of low molecular weight heparins: Relevant background information for your drug formulary. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2019;85:2479–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14081.

Kurki P, Van Aerts L, Wolff-Holz E, Giezen T, Skibeli V, Weise M. Interchangeability of Biosimilars: A European Perspective. BioDrugs 2017;31:83–91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-017-0210-0.

Published

04-09-2025

How to Cite

Zuluaga, A. F., Jiménez Toro, I., & Hincapie, A. (2025). Comparative in vitro evaluation of a biosimilar enoxaparin candidate and its reference product. Vitae, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v32n3a361315

Issue

Section

Pharmacology and Toxicology

Most read articles by the same author(s)