Social determinants of food in families from strata 4, 5, and 6 of the town of Chapinero, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.12592Keywords:
social determinants for diet, food securityAbstract
Objective: to identify the social determinants for the diet of the families from strata 4, 5, and 6 living in the town of Chapinero Bogotá. Methodology: an observational, qualitative, descriptive, and cross sectional study conducted on a sample of 150 families proportionally divided depending on stratum. Sampling was carried out using the snowball technique. Results: the social determinants for diet in the studied strata were: schooling level, tastes, culture, and the influence of the social environment. Conclusions: the socioeconomic level, which corresponds to the stratum, influences food access and availability; the education level determines the family income, culture and social environment (family and friends); finally, the involvement of the mass media in food promotion affects consumption and reshapes the eating habits, preferences, and tastes of the household members.
Downloads
References
(1). Organización Mundial de la Salud. Mejorar las condiciones de vida cotidianas. Comisión sobre determinantes sociales de la salud. 2008. [Internet] [acceso 22 de enero de 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/es/.
(2). Secretaría Distrital de Cultura, Recreación y Deportes. Observatorios de Culturas. Localidad de Chapinero. Ficha básica. Bogotá: SCRD, 2008.
(3). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Encuesta de la calidad de vida – Bogotá: Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá, Secretaría de Planeación, dane; 2007.
(4). Goossensen M, Van De Goor L, Vollemans E, Hendriks V and Garretsen H. Snowball sampling applied to opiate addicts out-side the treatment system. 1997. [revista en Internet] [acceso 24 de enero de 2011]; 5 (4). Disponible en: http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18419/971022_ELAND%20GOOSSENSEN,%20Maria%20Anne.pdf.
(5). Secretaría Distrital de Planeación. Inventario de información en material estadística sobre Bogotá. 2009. [Internet] [acceso 05 de mayo de 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.sdp.gov.co/.
(6). Mendenhall W, Reinmuth J. Estadística para administración y economía 4a ed. New York: wadsworth internacional iberoame-ricana; 2009. p. 418 -422.
(7). Amado K. Determinantes sociales de la alimentación en las fa-milias de estratos 1, 2 y 3 de la localidad de Chapinero. [Tesis de pregrado]. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; 2010.
(8). Jiménez J. Exploración cualitativa de las percepciones de familias de estrato 5 de la localidad de Chapinero – Bogotá frente a los há-bitos alimentarios y atributos de la alimentación saludable. [Tesis de pregrado] Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; 2008.
(9). Comité Intersectorial de alimentación y Nutrición. Plan local de seguridad alimentaria y nutricional para la localidad 2 Chapinero [Internet]. Bogotá: El Comité; 2007. Disponible en: http://www.saludcapital.gov.co/Publicaciones/Pol%C3%ADticas%20de%20salud/Pol%C3%ADtica%20de%20alimentaci%C3%B3n%20y%20nutrici%C3%B3n/planes%20%20locales%20%20SAN/SAN_CHAPINERO.pdf.
(10). Mena U. Localidad de Chapinero. Ficha básica. [Internet] Bogotá: Secretaría Distrital de Cultura, Recreación y Deportes, Observatorios de Culturas; 2008. p. 5-53. Disponible en: http://www.culturarecreacionydeporte.gov.co/observatorio/documentos/loca-lidades/chapinero.pdf.
(11). Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar (icbf). Encuesta de la Situación Alimentaria Nutricional en Colombia – ensin. Bogotá: icbf; 2005. p. 253-257.
(12). Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar (icbf). Encuesta Nacional de la Situación Alimentaria Nutricional en Colombia – en-sin. Resumen Ejecutivo. Bogotá: icbf, 2010. p. 14-23.
(13). The European Food Information Council [Internet]. Bruselas: The Council; 2009 [acceso 8 de mayo 2011]. The determinants of food choice. Disponible en: http://www.eufic.org/article/en/expid/review-food-choice/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Diana M. Belalcázar C., Luisa F. Tobar V.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
