The Challenge to Write Specific Quidelines on Research Ethics in social Science and Humanities, in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v33s1a17Keywords:
research ethics, Research Ethics Committees, bioethics, qualitative research, research subjects, epistemology, ethics of scienceAbstract
The aim of this article is to identify the ethical implications of the different scientific paradigms, in the context of the writing of a specific resolution to be included in set of the National Health Council (CNS) resolutions. It recognizes the paradigmatic, the theorethical and methodological diversity of the health field and assumes that the epistemological conflicts are inseparable from the political conflicts. This article is organized in this way: 1. CNS and the System made up by Committes on Research Ethics (CEP) and the National Commission on Research Ethics (CONEP); 2. Scientific paradigms and its implications for the discussion on research ethics; 3. The working group organized by CONEP to write specific resolution to Social Science and Humanities; 4. Final considerations.
Downloads
References
(1). Bourdieu P. O Campo científico. Em: Ortiz R. (org.). Pierre Bourdieu. São Paulo: Ática; 2003. pp.122-155.
(2). Diniz D. A pesquisa social e os comitês de ética no Brasil. Em: Fleischer S; Shuch P. (Orgs.). Ética e regulamentação na pesquisa antropológica. Brasília: Letras Vivas, 2010. pp. 183-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26512/9788598070247.c10
(3). Guerriero ICZ. Aspectos éticos das pesquisas qualitativas em saúde. 2006. 230 p. Tese (Doutorado em Saúde Pública), Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006.
(4). Guerriero ICZ, Dallari SG. The need for adequate ethical guidelines for qualitative health research. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva 2008; 13(2): 3003-3011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232008000200002
(5). Guerriero ICZ, Minayo MCS. O desafio de revisar aspectos éticos das pesquisas em ciências sociais e humanas: a necessidade de diretrizes específicas. Physis 2013; 23(3): 763-781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312013000300006
(6). Minayo MCS, Guerriero ICZ. Reflexividade como éthos da pesquisa qualitativa. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva 2014; 19(4): 1103-1112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232014194.18912013
(7). Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 196, de 10 de outubro de 1996. Dispõe sobre diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Disponível em: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/1996/Reso196.doc
(8). Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Dispõe sobre diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Disponível em: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf
(9). Brasil. Decreto nº 5.839, de 11 de julho de 2006, o qual redefine a organização, as atribuições e a composição do Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2006/Decreto/D5839.htm
(10). Victora C, Oliven RG, Maciel ME, Oro AP, editores. Antropologia e ética: o debate atual no Brasil. Niterói: Editora da Universidade Federal Fluminense; 2004.
(11). Guerriero ICZ, Schmidt MLS, Zicker F, editores. Ética nas pesquisas em ciências humanas e sociais na saúde. São Paulo: HUCITEC; 2008.
(12). Diniz D, Guerriero ICZ. Ética na pesquisa social: desafios ao modelo biomédico. RECIIS 2008; 2(1): 78- 90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3395/reciis.v2.Sup1.211pt
(13). Fleischer S, Shuch P, editoras. Ética e regulamentação na pesquisa antropológica. Brasília: Letras Vivas, 2010.
(14). Diniz D. Ética na pesquisa em ciências humanas - novos desafios. Ciência Saúde Coletiva 2008; 13(2):417-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232008000200017
(15). Callaway H. Ethnography and experience: gender implications in fieldwork and texts. Em: Okely J, Callaway H. Anthropology and autobiography. Nova Iorque: Routledge, Chapman & Hall. 1992. p. 33.
(16). Organização das Nações Unidas para a Educação, Ciência e Cultura. Declaração Universal sobre Bioética e Direitos Humanos, outubro de 2005.
(17). Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. Em: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994, pp. 105-117.
(18). Lincoln YS, Lynham SA, Guba EG. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revised. In Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The Sage Handbok of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011, pp. 97-128.
(19). Kuhn TS. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 5o ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva; 2000.
(20). Heron J, Reason P. A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry 1997; 3: 274- 294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300302
(21). Reason P, Heron J. The Practice of Co-operative Inquiry: Research with rather than on people. Em Reason P, Bradbury H(Eds.). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage; 2001. pp. 179-188.
(22). Silva FL. Methodological procedures and ethical decisions. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva 2008; 13(2): 324-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232008000200007
(23). Shaver FM. Sex work research: methodological and ethical challenges. J Interpers Violence 2005; 20(3): 296-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504274340
(24). Warr DJ. Stories in the flesh and voices in the head: reflections on the context and impact of research with disadvantaged populations. Qual Health Res 2004; 14(4):578-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303260449
(25). Ação Educativa; Instituto Montenegro; IBOPE. Indicador de alfabetismo functional INAF 2011: principais resultados. São Paulo (Brasil); 2012.
(26). Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos. Mestres 2012: Estudos da demografia da base técnico-científica brasileira. Brasília, DF. 2012. Disponível on line: http://www.cgee.org.br/publicacoes/mestres_e_doutores.php
(27). Bosk C, Devries R. Bureaucracies of mass deception: IRBs and the ethics of ethnographic research. Annals of the American Academy of Politic and Social Sciences 2004; 595:249-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204266913
(28). Israel M. Research Ethics and Integrity for Social Scientists - Beyond Regulatory Compliance. 2a edição. Sage; 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910096
(29). Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, Decembro 2010.
(30). Morse JM. Qualitative health research: creating a new discipline. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2012.
(31). Garrafa V. Mesa redonda: Cenários, desafios e perspectivas da ética na pesquisa em sua diversidade epistemologica. I Workshop de Ética em Pesquisa, 2014 agosto 18-19, 2014; Goiânia, Goiás.
(32). Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 370, de 8 de março de 2007. Dispõe sobre o registro e credenciamento ou renovação de registro e credenciamento do CEP. Disponível em: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/web_comissoes/conep/aquivos/resolucoes/resolucoes.htm
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
