Cultural Adaptation and Validity of the Instrument to Measure Self-management Behaviors in Cancer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.e341816Keywords:
neoplasms, psychometrics, selfmanagement, oncology nursing, patterns in health (PIH) scaleAbstract
Objective: Culturally adapt to Spanish and validate in Colombia the instrument of self-management behaviors for people with cancer. Method: Cross-sectional study of instrument validation in which, from the version of the pih scale [patterns in health] that measures self-management behaviors, its culturally adapted version was developed in Spanish, construct validity was advanced from the application to 182 adults diagnosed with cancer. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability were used through internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha. Results: An instrument culturally adapted to Colombian Spanish is obtained for use in people with cancer. The factor analysis revealed four factors with its own vector: knowledge, recognition and management of symptoms, alliance between health personnel / doctor-patient and coping. Internal consistency is acceptable with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.728. Conclusions: The PIH scale adapted to Spanish comprehensively evaluates the self-management behaviours of a person with cancer, demonstrated construct validity and internal consistency for use in the Colombian context.
Downloads
References
(1). Murillo R, Wiesner C, Acosta J, et al. Modelo de cuidado del paciente con cáncer. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Ministerio Salud y Protección Social [internet]; 2015 [citado 2017 mar. 15]. Disponible en: https://www.cancer.gov.co/files/libros/archivos/modelo
(2). Lorig K, Holman H. Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01
(3). Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Organización Munidal de la Salud. Cuidados innovadores para las condiciones crónicas: organización y prestación de atención de alta calidad a las enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles en las Américas [internet]; 2013 [citado 2017 mar. 18]. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2013/CuidadosInnovadores-v5.pdf
(4). Grady P, Gough L. El automanejo de las enfermedades crónicas: un método integral de atención. Rev. Panam Salud Publica [internet]. 2015 [citado 2017 mar. 18]; 37(3):187-94. Disponible en: https://scielosp.org/article/rpsp/2015.v37n3/187-194/
(5). Ryan P, Sawin K. The individual and family self-management theory: Background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nurs Outlook. 2009;57(4):217-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004
(6). Battersby M, Melanie H, Lewis R, et al. A randomised trial of the Flinders Program to improve patient self-management competencies in a range of chronic conditions: Study rationale and protocol. Australas. Medical J. 2010;1(3):198-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2010.250
(7). Battersby M, Ask A, Reece M, et al. The Partners in Health scale: The development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self-management. Aust. J. Prim. Health. 2003;9(3):41-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PY03022
(8). Petkov J, Harvey P, Battersby M. The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: Validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(7): 1079-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9661-1
(9). Smith D, Harvey P, Lawn S, et al. Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: Factor structure of the revised Partners in Health [PIH] scale. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(1): 149-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1368-5
(10). Peñarrieta I, Barrios F, Gutierrez T, et al. Self-management inc chronic conditions: Partners in health scale instrument validation. Nurs Manag [Harrow]. 2014;20(10):32-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nm2014.02.20.10.32.e1084
(11). Beaton D, Bombardier C, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
(12). Polit D, Yang F. Measurement and the measurement of change: A primer for the healh professions. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.
(13). Colombia, Ministerio de Salud. Resolución 008430 de 1993, por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud (1993 oct. 4).
(14). Lawn S, Battersby M, Harvey P, et al. A behavioural therapy approach to self-management: The Flinders Program. Diabetes Voice. 2009;54(Special Issue):30-32.
(15). Peñarrieta M, Vergel O, Schimth L, et al. Validación de un instrumento para evaluar el automanejo en enfermedades crónicas en el primer nivel de atención en salud. Rev. Cient. de Enferm. 2012;8(1):64-73.
(16). Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.19.2469
(17). Lenferink A, Effing T, Harvey P, et al. Construct validity of the Dutch version of the 12-item partners in health scale: Measuring patient self-management behaviour and knowledge in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(8):1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161595
(18). Smith D, Lawn S, et al. Concurrent validity of the Partners in Health scale against general self-rated health in chronic conditions: A short report. Chronic IIIn. 2019;15(1):74-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395317743559
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 University of Antioquia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
