Reproducibilidad en la lectura de un set de placas de citología cérvico-uterinas en cuatro centros especializados de Medellín, Antioquia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.15340Palavras-chave:
cáncer cervical, citología, cérvicouterina, reproducibilidadResumo
Downloads
Referências
(1). Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Es-timates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: globocan 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127: 2893-2917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25516
(2). La Vecchia C, Bosetti C, Lucchini F, Bertuccio P, Negri E, Boyle P, et al. Cancer mortality in Europe, 2000-2004, and an overview of trends since 1975. Ann Oncol 2010; 21 (6): 1323-1360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp530
(3). Robles SC, White F, Peruga A. Trends in cervical cancer mortality in the Americas. Bull Pan Am Health Organ 1996; 30: 290-301.
(4). Monsonego J, Bosch FX, Coursaget P, Cox JT, Franco E, Frazer I, et al. Cervical cancer control, priorities and new directions. Int J Cancer 2004; 108: 329-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11530
(5). Koss LG. The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy. jama 1989; 261: 737-743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.261.5.737
(6). Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O’Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002; 287: 2114-2119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.16.2114
(7). Laara E, Day NE, Hakama M. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised scree-ning programmes. Lancet 1987; 1: 1247-1249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(87)92695-X
(8). Sankaranarayanan R, Madhukar Budukh A, Rajkumar R. Effecti-ve Screening Programes for Cervical Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Developing Countries. Bulletin of the World Health Orga-nization 2001; 79: 954-962.
(9). Murillo R, Almonte M, Pereira A, Ferrer E, Gamboa OA, Jer£nimo J, et al. Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Latin America and the Caribbean: Prevention of Cervical Cancer in La-tin America and the Caribbean Region: Progress and Challenges on HPV Vaccination and Screening. Vaccine 2008; 26: L37-L48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.013
(10). Pineros M, Cendales R, Murillo R, Wiesner C, Tovar S. [Pap test coverage and related factors in Colombia, 2005.]. Rev Salud Pú-blica; 2007; 9: 327-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642007000300002
(11). Cendales R, Wiesner C, Murillo RH, Pineros M, Tovar S, Mejia JC. Quality of vaginal smear for cervical cancer screening: a con-cordance study. Biomédica; 2010. pp. 107-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v30i1.158
(12). Confortini M, Carozzi F, Dalla Palma P, Ghiringhello B, Parisio F, Prandi S, et al. Interlaboratory reproducibility of atypical squa-mous cells of undetermined significance report: a national survey. Cytopathology 2003; 14: 263-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2003.00061.x
(13). Stoler MH, Schiffman M. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. JAMA 2001; 285: 1500-1505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.11.1500
(14). Bernstein SJ, Sanchez-Ramos L, Ndubisi B. Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001. pp. 308-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.116736
(15). Grisales H, Vanegas AP, Gaviria AM, Castano J, Mora MA, Bo-rrero M, et al. Prevalence of epithelial squamous cell abnormali-ties and associated factors in women of a rural town of Colombia. Biomédica 2008; 28: 181-182.
(16). Fleiss J. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 1971; 76: 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
(17). Chmur KH, Periyakoil V. Kappa coefficients in medical research. Stat Med 2002; 21: 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1180
(18). Lazcano-Ponce E, Palacio-Mejía LS, Allen-Leigh B, Yunes-Diaz E, Alonso P, Schiavon R, et al. Decreasing cervical cancer morta-lity in Mexico: effect of Papanicolaou coverage, birthrate, and the importance of diagnostic validity of cytology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17(10): 2808-2817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2659
(19). Baena A, Almonte M, Valencia ML, Martínez S, Quintero K, Sán-chez GI. Trends and social indicators of both mortality breast can-cer and cervical cancer in Antioquia, Colombia, 2000-2007. Salud Pública Mex 2011; 53: 486-492.
(20). Profamilia. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Demografía (ENDS) 2010. Bogotá: Ministerio de la Protección Social; 2010.
(21). Renshaw AA, Davey DD, Birdsong GG, Walsh M, Styer PE, Mody DR, et al. Precision in gynecologic cytologic interpretation: a study from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003; 127: 1413-1420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5858/2003-127-1413-PIGCIA
(22). Grisales H, Vanegas AP, Gaviria AM, Castano J, Mora MA, Bo-rrero M, et al. Prevalence of epithelial squamous cell abnormali-ties and associated factors in women of a rural town of Colombia. Biomédica; 2008; 28: 271-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v28i2.98
(23). Kumar N, Sayed S, Moloo Z. Educational needs and causes of fal-se diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance at a university hospital. Afr J Reprod Health 2011; 15: 113-116.
(24). Nygard JF, Sauer T, Skjeldestad FE, Skare GB, Thoresen SO. CIN 2/3 and cervical cancer after an ASCUS pap smear. A 7-year, prospective study of the Norwegian population-based, coordina-ted screening program. Acta Cytol 2003; 47: 991-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000326673
(25). McGrath CM. ASCUS in Papanicolaou smears. Problems, con-troversies, and potential future directions. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 117 Suppl: S62-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1309/DK4A-2R4G-BRK7-JU8Y
(26). Díaz MC, Parra EA. Guía Control de Calidad para la toma proce-samiento e interpretación en muestras de citología de cuello uteri-no. Bogotá: Instituto Nacional de Salud; 2009.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Edwin Guevara, Armando Baena, Maribel Almonte, Jorge E. Salazar, Ángela Gaviria, Gloria I. Sánchez
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
El autor o los autores conserva(n) los derechos morales y cede(n) los derechos patrimoniales que corresponderán a la Universidad de Antioquia, para publicarlo, distribuir copias electrónicas, incluirlas en servicios de indización, directorios o bases de datos nacionales e internacionales en Acceso Abierto, bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional Comercial (CC BY-NC-SA) la cual permite a otros distribuir, remezclar, retocar y crear a partir de la obra de modo no comercial, siempre y cuando se dé crédito respectivo y licencien las nuevas creaciones bajo las mismas condiciones.
--
--
--
