Índice Estatístico para o Diagnóstico de Sarcopenia em Mulheres Idosas Fisicamente Ativas com Mais de 60 Anos de Idade: Um estudo transversal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.e355147Palavras-chave:
Dinapenia, força explosiva, força de preensão manual, composição corporalResumo
Objetivo: A detecção e a classificação da sarcopenia envolvem a análise de muitas variáveis (50 a 60), o que aumenta o tempo e os custos necessários para diagnosticar e tratar essa condição. O objetivo do estudo foi desenvolver um índice estatístico sintético para diagnosticar e classificar a sarcopenia em mulheres fisicamente ativas com mais de 60 anos de idade.
Metodologia: Foi realizado um estudo transversal em 100 mulheres fisicamente ativas (64,88 ± 4,4 anos), nas quais foram realizadas medidas de composição corporal, força muscular e testes de marcha. Foram feitas mil seleções aleatórias dos conjuntos de treinamento e teste (80% e 20%, respectivamente), a regressão logística foi ajustada e o procedimento de regularização (regressão de rede elástica) foi realizado.
Resultados: o índice de massa esquelética apendicular (kg/m2), a massa muscular (kf/m2) e o SAMI (kg/m2) mostraram-se altamente correlacionados (0,93) e a velocidade de caminhada lenta (m/seg) foram as variáveis que mais contribuíram para o diagnóstico de sarcopenia, com uma correlação visivelmente alta de (94%).
Conclusão: a massa magra apendicular, a velocidade da marcha e a força explosiva descrevem suficientemente o estado de declínio muscular e funcional (sarcopenia) em mulheres idosas fisicamente ativas. Além disso, a identificação e a classificação precisas dessa condição facilitam a intervenção multidisciplinar abrangente, aumentando o impacto positivo dos programas de promoção da saúde e prevenção de doenças.
Downloads
Referências
1 Shafiee G, Keshtkar A, Soltani A, Ahadi Z, Larijani B, Heshmat R. Prevalence of sarcopenia in the world: A systematic review and meta-analysis of general population studies. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017;16:21. doi:10.1186/s40200-017-0302-x
2 Rojas-Bermúdez C, Buckcanan-Vargas A, Benavides-Jiménez G. Sarcopenia: Abordaje integral del adulto mayor. Rev Med Sinergia. 2019;4(5):24 - 34. doi:10.31434/rms.v4i5.194
3 Rodríguez-Rejón AI, Ruiz-López MD, Artacho R. Diagnóstico y prevalencia de sarcopenia en residencias de mayores: EWGSOP2 frente al EWGSOP1. Nutr Hosp. 2019;36:1074-1080. doi:10.20960/nh.02573
4 Verjans-Janssen SRB, Van Kann DHH, Gerards S, Vos SB, Jansen MWJ, Kremers SPJ. Study protocol of the quasi-experimental evaluation of “KEIGAAF”: A context-based physical activity and nutrition intervention for primary school children. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):842. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5764-3
5 Burgos-Peláez R. Sarcopenia en ancianos. Endocrinol y Nutr. 2006;53(5):335-344. doi:10.1016/S1575-0922(06)71113-5
6 Gutiérrez-Cortés WA, Martínez-Fernández FE, Olaya-Sanmiguel LC. Sarcopenia, una patología nueva que impacta a la vejez. Rev Colomb Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2018;5(1):28-36. doi:10.53853/encr.5.1.339
7 Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16-31. doi:10.1093/ageing/afy169
8 Mayhew AJ, Amog K, Phillips S, Parise G, McNicholas PD, de Souza RJ et al. The prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults, an exploration of differences between studies and within definitions: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):48-56. doi:10.1093/ageing/afy106
9 Kołodziej M, Ignasiak Z, Ignasiak T. Annual changes in appendicular skeletal muscle mass and quality in adults over 50 y of age, assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Nutrition. 2021;90:111342. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2021.111342
10 Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:115. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-115
11 Jenicek M. Foundations of evidence-based medicine: Clinical epidemiology and beyond: CRC Press2019.
12 Janssen I, Baumgartner RN, Ross R, Rosenberg IH, Roubenoff R. Skeletal muscle cutpoints associated with elevated physical disability risk in older men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(4):413-421. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh058
13 Fernandes S, Rodrigues da Silva E, New York B, Macedo P, Gonçalves R, Camara S et al. Cutoff points for grip strength in screening for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older-adults: A systematic review. J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26(5):452-460. doi:10.1007/s12603-022-1788-6
14 Gledhill N, Shephard RJ, Jamnik V, Bredin SSD, Warburton DER. Consensus on evidence-based preparticipation screening and risk stratification. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;36(1):53-102. doi:10.1891/0198-8794.36.53
15 Heyward V. Evaluación y prescripción del ejercicio: Paidotribo, Barcelona, 2006.
16 Fan Y, Zhang B, Huang G, Zhang G, Ding Z, Li Z et al. Sarcopenia: Body composition and gait analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:909551. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.909551
17 Ditroilo M, Forte R, McKeown D, Boreham C, De Vito G. Intra- and inter-session reliability of vertical jump performance in healthy middle-aged and older men and women. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(15):1675-1682. doi:10.1080/02640414.2011.614270
18 Bohannon RW, Schaubert KL. Test-retest reliability of grip-strength measures obtained over a 12-week interval from community-dwelling elders. J Hand Ther. 2005;18(4):426-427, quiz 428. doi:10.1197/j.jht.2005.07.003
19 Ostir GV, Berges IM, Ottenbacher KJ, Fisher SR, Barr E, Hebel JR et al. Gait speed and dismobility in older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(9):1641-1645. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.05.017
20 van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(3):1 - 67. doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03
21 Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Statist Soc B 2005;67(2):301-320. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
22 World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
23 Boehmke FJ, Brockway M, Desmarais BA, Harden JJ, LaCombe S, Linder F et al. SPID: A new database for inferring public policy innovativeness and diffusion networks. Policy Stud J. 2020;48(2):517-545. doi:10.1111/psj.12357
24 Pennington N, Hastie R. Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;62(2):189–206. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
25 Shepherd JA, Ng BK, Sommer MJ, Heymsfield SB. Body composition by DXA. Bone. 2017;104:101-105. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2017.06.010
26 Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, Nevitt M, Schwartz AV et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: The health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(10):1059-1064. doi:10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059
27 Barbat-Artigas S, Plouffe S, Pion CH, Aubertin-Leheudre M. Toward a sex-specific relationship between muscle strength and appendicular lean body mass index? J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2013;4(2):137-144. doi:10.1007/s13539-012-0100-8
28 Gianoudis J, Bailey CA, Daly RM. Associations between sedentary behaviour and body composition, muscle function and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(2):571-579. doi:10.1007/s00198-014-2895-y
29 Lee Y, Shin S. The effect of body composition on gait variability varies with age: Interaction by hierarchical moderated regression analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3). doi:10.3390/ijerph19031171
30 Daly RM, Rosengren BE, Alwis G, Ahlborg HG, Sernbo I, Karlsson MK. Gender specific age-related changes in bone density, muscle strength and functional performance in the elderly: a-10 year prospective population-based study. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13(1):71. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-71
31 Larsson L, Degens H, Li M, Salviati L, Lee Yi, Thompson W et al. Sarcopenia: Aging-related loss of muscle mass and function. Physiol Rev. 2018;99(1):427-511. doi:10.1152/physrev.00061.2017
32 Drummond FMM, Lourenço RA, Lopes CS. Association between fear of falling and spatial and temporal parameters of gait in older adults: The FIBRA-RJ study. Eur Geriatr Med. 2022;13(2):407-413. doi:10.1007/s41999-021-00601-5
33 Sofi F, Capalbo A, Pucci N, Giuliattini J, Condino F, Alessandri F et al. Cardiovascular evaluation, including resting and exercise electrocardiography, before participation in competitive sports: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2008;337:a346. doi:10.1136/bmj.a346
34 Lin Y-C, Tseng I-J, Lu Y-C, Yang S-W, Wu C-C, Lin Y-N et al. Muscle mass and gait characteristics in older women fallers vs. non-fallers. J Clin Med. 2021;10(17). doi:10.3390/jcm10173924
35 Alcazar J, Alegre LM, Van Roie E, Magalhães JP, Nielsen BR, González-Gross M et al. Relative sit-to-stand power: aging trajectories, functionally relevant cut-off points, and normative data in a large European cohort. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12(4):921-932. doi:10.1002/jcsm.12737
36 Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing. 2006;35(suppl 2):ii37-ii41. doi:10.1093/ageing/afl084
37 Miller RM, Freitas EDS, Heishman AD, Peak KM, Buchanan SR, Kellawan JM et al. Muscle performance changes with age in active women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9). doi:10.3390/ijerph18094477
38 Ramírez-Villada J, Arango-Paternina C, Tibaduiza-Romero A, Rodríguez-Perdomo L, Molina-Restrepo N, Márquez-Arabia J. Functional autonomy and sarcopenia markers in women over 55 years of age. Rev Fac Med. 2021;69(4):e84849. doi:10.15446/revfacmed.v69n4.84849
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Universidad de Antioquia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
El autor o los autores conserva(n) los derechos morales y cede(n) los derechos patrimoniales que corresponderán a la Universidad de Antioquia, para publicarlo, distribuir copias electrónicas, incluirlas en servicios de indización, directorios o bases de datos nacionales e internacionales en Acceso Abierto, bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional Comercial (CC BY-NC-SA) la cual permite a otros distribuir, remezclar, retocar y crear a partir de la obra de modo no comercial, siempre y cuando se dé crédito respectivo y licencien las nuevas creaciones bajo las mismas condiciones.
--
--
--
