Metodologia ergonômica para o desenvolvimento tecnológico agrícola de uma ferramenta manual: estudo de caso da enxada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.e355971Palavras-chave:
Ergonomia, Fazendeiros, Descritores, Desenho de Equipamento, Satisfação no EmpregoResumo
Objetivo: Mostrar a metodologia de co-design utilizada para o desenvolvimento de uma ferramenta manual para o campo, em que o eixo central é a compreensão e a inclusão das necessidades e dos desejos dos usuários, com o objetivo de promover a transferência de tecnologia desde a concepção do produto.
Metodologia: O processo de co-design aplicado consiste em oito etapas práticas de criação, com trabalho conjunto síncrono e assíncrono, em cenários presenciais e plataformas virtuais. Participaram 143 agricultores durante o desenvolvimento da ferramenta.
Resultados: além da metodologia de co-design para o desenvolvimento da ferramenta manual do agricultor, mostra-se a proposta de estudo da enxada de duplo propósito, em que o projeto constatou que essa nova proposta apresentou melhor qualidade ergonômica, pela redução do risco associado à carga postural e melhor percepção de conforto.
Conclusão: A principal constatação é o envolvimento dos usuários desde os estágios iniciais do processo de desenvolvimento de uma tecnologia, o que permite uma correta compreensão de suas necessidades e desejos em relação ao desempenho de sua atividade de trabalho. O estudo também mostra que é possível mitigar os fatores de risco e, ao fazê-lo, conceber uma ferramenta muito mais confortável com recursos de melhor qualidade ergonômica.
Downloads
Referências
1. Nag PK, Gite LP. Manpower utilization: Working methods and practices in small land holdings. En: Human-centered agriculture: Ergonomics and human factors applied. Singapore: Springer; 2020. pp. 15.35.
2. Oficina Internacional del Trabajo. Seguridad y salud en la agricultura. Repertorio de recomendaciones prácticas. Oficina Internacional del Trabajo [internet]; 2011 [citado 2023 ene. 17]. Disponible en: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@safework/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_161137.pdf
3. Nunes I. Troduction to musculoskeletal disorders. OSHwiki [internet]; 2017 [citado 2023 ene. 17]. Disponible en: https://oshwiki.osha.europa.eu/en/themes/introduction-musculoskeletal-disorders
4. Velásquez JC, Velásquez DM. Morbilidad laboral en trabajadores del sector agrícola de Colombia. Prevención Integral y ORP Conference [internet]. 2014 [citado 2023 ene. 17]. Disponible en: https://www.prevencionintegral.com/canal-orp/papers/orp-2014/morbilidad-laboral-en-trabajadores-sector-agricola-colombia
5. ILO. Global trends on occupational accidents and diseases [internet]. 2015 [citado 2023 ene. 17]. pp. 1-7, Disponible en: http://www.ilo.org/legacy/english/osh/en/story_content/external_files/fs_st_1-ILO_5_en.pdf
6. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Perspectivas del sector agropecuario en Colombia. [internet]. 2022 [citado 2023 abr. 17]. pp. 1-7, Disponible en: https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/planes-departamentos-ciudades/220331-Presentacion-general-Asoleche-fin.pdf
7. Consejo Colombiano de Seguridad, Observatorio de la Seguridad y Salud. Accidentes de trabajo y enfermedades laborales en Colombia 1.er semestre de 2022 [internet]; 2022 [citado 2023 oct. 13]. Disponible en: https://ccs.org.co/atel-col-1er-semestre-2022
8. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Boletín técnico. Ocupación informal. Trimestre abril- junio 2023. [internet]; 2023 ago. 11 [citado 2024 abr. 27]. Disponible en: https://www.dane.gov.co/files/operaciones/GEIH/bol-GEIHEISS-abr-jun2023.pdf
9. Agronet. La industria de plantas aromáticas exportó US$49,2 millones y creció 16% en 2022 [internet]. 2023 ago. 18 [citado 2024 abr. 27]. Disponible en: https://www.agronet.gov.co/Noticias/Paginas/La-industria-de-plantas-arom%C3%A1ticas-export%C3%B3-us$49,2-millones-y-creci%C3%B3-16-en-2022.aspx
10. Asociación Nacional de Comercio Exterior. Las exportaciones de Colombia se impulsan con las hierbas aromáticas [internet]. s. f. [citado 2024 abr. 27]. Disponible en: https://www.analdex.org/2023/02/24/las-exportaciones-de-colombia-se-impulsan-con-las-hierbas-aromaticas/
11. Ansell C, Torfing J. Public innovation through collaboration and design. New York: Routledge; 2014.
12. Eastwood CR, Turner FJ, Romera AJ. Farmer-centred design: An affordances-based framework for identifying processes that facilitate farmers as co-designers in addressing complex agricultural challenges. Agric Syst. 2022;195:103314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103314
13. Plattner H, Meinel C, Weinberg, U. Design thinking. Landsberg am Lech: Mi-Fachverlag; 2009.
14. Guerlesquin G, Sagot JC. Vers une meilleure intégration de l’ergonomie et du design industriel dans la conception. En: 6ème Conférence Internationale Conception et Production Intégrées [internet]; 2009 [citado 2022 nov. 11]. pp. 1-19. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260075467_Vers_une_meilleure_integration_de_l’ergonomie_ et_du_design_dans_la_conception/link/584eecb208aed95c25099410/download?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19
15. Brangier E, Robert JM. Manifeste pour l’ergonomie prospective: Anticiper de futures activités humaines en vue de concevoir de nouveaux artéfacts. En: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine; 2010. pp. 57-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1941007.1941016
16. Norman D. The design of everyday things. New York: Basic books [internet]; 2013 [citado 2022 nov. 11]. Disponible en: https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files4/4bb8d08a9b309df7d86e62ec4056ceef.pdf
17. Gatsi W, Muzari W, Muvhunzi S. The impacts of technology adoption on smallholder agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review cite this paper related papers the impacts of technology adoption on smallholder agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review. J Sustain Dev. 2012;5(8):69-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v5n8p69
18. Steinke J, Ortiz-Crespo B, et al. Participatory design of digital innovation in agricultural research-for-development: Insights from practice. Agric Syst. 2022;195:103313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103313
19. Anton D, Rosecrance J, Gerr F, et al. Effect of concrete block weight and wall height on electromyographic activity and heart rate of masons. Ergonomics. 2005;48(10):1314-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130500274168
20. Kuijt-Evers LFM. Comfort in using hand tools: Theory, design and evaluation [tesis doctoral]. Delft: Universidad Tecnológica de Delft [internet]; 2007 [citado 2020 may .8]. Disponible en: https://repository.tudelft.nl/record/uuid:c3fcf850-7423-4fb1-95c5-d92da8993210
21. Lannon J, Walsh JN. Project facilitation as an active response to tensions in international development programmes. Int J Proj Manag. 2020:38(8):486-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.002
22. Asociación Médica Mundial (ANM). Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM - Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos [internet]; 2024 may. 23 [citado 2023 nov. 10]. Disponible en: https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/
23. National Commision for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedica and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. DHEW Publication No.(OS) 78-0012). 1978. Washington [internet] 1978 [citado 2023 nov. 10]. Disponible en: https://videocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_belmont_report.pdf
24. Colombia, Ministerio de Salud. Resolución 8430, por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud (1993 oct. 4).
25. Mondragón Donés S. Aportaciones de la semántica del producto al diseño de herramientas [tesis doctoral]. Castellón de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I [internet]; 2011 [citado 2020 feb 5]. Disponible en: https://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10803/81926?show=full
26. Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003;14(3):207-22. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
27. Villanueva M, et al. Guía nacional de vigilancia e inteligencia estratégica (VeIE): Buenas prácticas para generar sistemas territoriales de gestión de VeIE. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva [internet]; 2015 [citado 2021 feb. 5]. Disponible en: https://ctplas.com.uy/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/guia-nacional-de-vigilancia-e-inteligencia-estrategica.pdf
28. Sarraipa J, Artíficie A, Jiménez H. Metodología de evaluación de prototipo innovador. s. c.: Acacia [internet]; 2019 [citado 2024 ene. 5]. Disponible en: https://acacia.red/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Guía-Metodología-de-evaluación-de-prototipo-innovador.pdf
29. Torenvliet G. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. 2008;15(2):70-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1340961.1340979
30. Mokdad M, Al-Ansari M. Anthropometrics for the design of Bahraini school furniture. Int J Ind Ergon, 2009;39(5):728-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.02.006
31. Kivi P, Mattila M. Analysis and improvement of work postures in the building industry: Application of the computerized OWAS method. Applied Ergonomics, 1991;22(1): 43-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(91)90009-7
32. Paulus PB, Kenworthy JB. Effective brainstorming. En Paulus PB, Nijstad BA, editors. The Oxford handbook of group creativity and innovation. Oxford Library of Psychology; 2019. pp. 287-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190648077.001.0001
33. Looze MP De, Kuijt-Evers LFM, Van Dieën J. Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures, Ergonomics. 2003;46(10):985-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000121977
34. Cross, N. Métodos de diseño. Estrategias para el diseño de productos. Mexico: Limusa Wiley; 2008.
35. Industrial Designers Society of America. [Página web] [internet] s. f. [citado 2020 feb. 5]. Disponible en: https://www.idsa.org/
36. Ashburner JE, Kienzle J. Agricultural hand tools in emergencies: Guidelines for technical and field officers. Roma: FAO [internet]; 2012 [citado 2020 feb 05]. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3197e.pdf
37. Association Française de Normalisation – Afnor, Ergonomie. 2.a ed. Paris.
38. Das B, Wang Y. Isometric pull-push strengths in workspace: 1. strength profiles. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2004:10(1):43-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2004.11076594
39. Mankins JC. Technology readiness levels. A White Paper, April, 6(1995) [internet]; 1995 [citado 2020 feb. 5]. Disponible en: http://www.artemisinnovation.com/images/TRL_White_Paper_2004-Edited.pdf
40. Aptel M, Claudon L, Marsot J. Integration of ergonomics into hand tool design: Principle and presentation of an example. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2002;8(1):107-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2002.11076518
41. Marsot J, Claudon L. Design and ergonomics. Methods for integrating ergonomics at hand tool design stage. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2004;10(1):13-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2004.11076591
42. Aweke CS, Hassen JY, Wordofa MG, et al. Impact assessment of agricultural technologies on household food consumption and dietary diversity in eastern Ethiopia. J Agric Food Res. 2021;4:100141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100141
43. Djoumessi YF. What innovations impact agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa? J Agric Food Res. 2021;6:100228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100228
44. Masiero S. The origins of failure: Seeking the causes of design–reality gaps. Inf Technol Dev. 2016;22(3):487-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1143346
45. Oestergaard A, Smidt TF, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders and perceived physical work demands among offshore wind industry technicians across different turbine sizes: A cross-sectional study. Int J Ind Ergon. 2022;88:103278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103278
46. Briggs M, Huckel Schneider C, Slater H, et al. Health systems strengthening to arrest the global disability burden: Empirical development of prioritised components for a global strategy for improving musculoskeletal health. BMJ Glob Health, 2021;6(6):e006045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006045
47. Skovlund SV, Bláfoss R, et al. Andersen, Association between physical work demands and work ability in workers with musculoskeletal pain: Cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03191-8
48. Oakman J, Weale V, Kinsman N, et al. Workplace physical and psychosocial hazards: A systematic review of evidence informed hazard identification tools. Appl Ergon. 2022:100:103614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103614
49. Vos T, Lim S, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
50. Crawford JO, Berkovic D, Erwin J, et al. Musculoskeletal health in the workplace. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020;34(5):101558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2020.101558
51. Fathallah FA, Miller BJ, Miles JA. Low back disorders in agriculture and the role of stooped work: Scope, potential interventions, and research needs. J Agric Saf Health. 2008;14(2):221-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.24352
52. Dul J, Douwes M, Smitt P. Ergonomic guidelines for the prevention of discomfort of static postures based on endurance data. Ergonomics. 1994;37(5):807-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963690
53. Kuijt-Evers LFM, Bosch T, Huysmans MA, Looze MP, Vink P, Association between objective and subjective measurements of comfort and discomfort in hand tools. Appl Ergon. 2007;38(5):643-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.05.004
54. Sperling L, Dahlman S, Wikström L, et al. A cube model for the classification of work with hand tools and the formulation of functional requirements. Appl Ergon. 1993;24(3):212-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90009-X
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Universidad de Antioquia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
El autor o los autores conserva(n) los derechos morales y cede(n) los derechos patrimoniales que corresponderán a la Universidad de Antioquia, para publicarlo, distribuir copias electrónicas, incluirlas en servicios de indización, directorios o bases de datos nacionales e internacionales en Acceso Abierto, bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional Comercial (CC BY-NC-SA) la cual permite a otros distribuir, remezclar, retocar y crear a partir de la obra de modo no comercial, siempre y cuando se dé crédito respectivo y licencien las nuevas creaciones bajo las mismas condiciones.
--
--
--
