Las psicologías no mediacionales: Introducción

Ricardo Pérez Almonacid

doi:10.17533/udea.rp.e350951

Autores/as

Ricardo Pérez Almonacid Universidad de Antioquia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-6478

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.e350951

Palabras clave:

psicologías no mediacionales, psicologías mediacionales, antirepresentacionalismo, conductismo, cognición corporeizada radical, enactivismo

Resumen

El artículo tiene el objetivo de introducir a las aproximaciones no mediacionales en psicología y servir de contexto para comprender el debate al que fueron invitados Josep Roca i Balasch, José Enrique Burgos Triano y Pablo Covarrubias en este número monográfico. Comienza caracterizando lo central de las psicologías mediacionales, para comprender a lo que se oponen las psicologías no mediacionales. Posteriormente, ofrece un mapa genealógico de esta familia de aproximaciones, que a su vez sirve para comprender las redes de influencia teórica entre varios autores y para ubicar a los autores invitados. Enseguida, presenta los principales argumentos que esgrimen las psicologías no mediacionales, resaltando que no necesariamente todas las modalidades acogen todos los argumentos. Finalmente, se hace una breve reseña biográfica de los invitados y se presenta la estructura del monográfico.

|Resumen

= 1654 veces | PDF

= 2159 veces|

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Ricardo Pérez Almonacid, Universidad de Antioquia

Doctor en Ciencias del Comportamiento: opción Análisis de la Conduta, Universidad de Guadalajara. Profesor del Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Antioquia.

Citas

Adams, F. y Aizawa, K. (2010). The bounds of cognition. 2da. Ed. Blackwell.

Alksnis, N. y Reynolds, J. (2019). Revaluing the behaviorist ghost in enactivism and embodied cognition. Synthese, 198, 5785–5807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02432-1

Baggs, E. y Chemero, A. (2021). Radical embodiment in two directions. Synthese, 198, 2175–2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02020-9

Bever, T. G., Fodor, J. A. y Garrett, M. (1968). A formal limitation of associationism. En Dixon, R. y Horton, D. L. (Eds.), Verbal behavior and general behavior theory. Prentice-Hall.

Brentano, F. (1973). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. [La psicología desde el punto de vista empírico]. Meiner. Publicado originalmente en 1874.

Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. mit Press.

Corris, A. y Chemero, A. (2022). Embodiment and enactivism. En B. D., Young y C. D. Jennings (eds.), Mind, cognition, and neuroscience: A philosophical introduction. Routledge.

Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Columbia University Press.

Clark, A. (1997). Being there. mit Press.

Covarrubias, P., Cabrera, F. y Jiménez, Á. A. (2017). Invariants and information pickup in The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems: Implications for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Ecological Psychology, 29(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2017.1332460

Day, W. F. (1969). Radical behaviorism in reconciliation with phenomenology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(2), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-315

De Sousa, L. B. y Gabriel, R. (2015). Does the mental lexicon exist? Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 23(2), 335-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237.2083.23.2.335-361

Di Paolo, E. A., Buhrmann, T. y Barandiaran, X. E. (2017). Sensorimotor life: An enactive proposal. Oxford University Press.

Dietrich, (2007). Representation. En P. Thagard (Ed.). Philosophy of psychology and cognitive science. (pp. 1- 29). Elsevier.

Dołęga, K. y Schlicht, T. (2022). Mental content. En B. J. Young y C. D. Jennings (eds.), Mind, cognition and neuroscience: A philosophical introduction (pp. 199-213). Routledge.

Donahoe, J.W. y Palmer, D.C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Allyn and Bacon.

Fodor, J. (1981). The mind-body problem. Scientific American, 244(1), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0181-114

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

Goldstein, E. B. (2011). Cognitive psychology. Connecting mind, research and everyday experience. 3rd. ed. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Hutto, D. y Myin, E. (2019). Evolving enactivism: basic minds meet content. mit Press.

Kantor, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioral psychology: A sample of scientific system construction. Principia Press.

Killeen, P. R. (2019). Timberlake’s theories dissolve anomalies. Behavioural Processes, 166, 103894, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103894

Klein, S. B. (2015). What memory is. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1333

Leudar, I. y Costall, A. (2009). Against Theory of Mind. Plagrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234383

Machado, A., Guilhardi, P., Caetano, M.S. y Silva, F. J. (2020). Rules of conduct for Behavior Analysts in the presence of hypothetical constructs: a commentary on Eckard and Lattal (2020). Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43(4), 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-020-00272-w

Menary, R. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9187-6

Morris, E. K. (2003). Behavior analysis and a modern psychology: Programs of direct action. En K. A. Lattal y P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 275–298). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.

Morris, E. K. (2009). Behavior analysis and ecological psychology: past, present, and future. a review of Harry Heft’s Ecological Psychology in context. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 92(2), 275-304. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2009.92-275.

Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Harvard University Press.

Palmer, D. C. y Donahoe, J. W. (1992). Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. The American Psychologist, 47(11), 1344–1358. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.47.11.1344

Pérez-Almonacid, R. (2018). Los límites de la integración teórica en psicología. En G. Gutiérrez (comp.). Teorías en psicología. Integración y el futuro de la disciplina (p.24-67). Manual Moderno.

Pérez-Almonacid, R. (2019). A non-mediational approach to emotions and feelings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00181

Pérez-Almonacid, R. (2021). Heidegger and psychological behavior. Ideas. Revista de Ciencia del Comportamiento. https://www.ideiasjournal.com/articulo?id=1637344754642

Pérez-Álvarez, M. y Sass, L. A. (2008). Phenomenology and behaviorism: A mutual readjustment. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 15(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.0.0194

Perner, J. y Leahy, B. (2015). Mental files in development: Dual naming, false belief, identity, and intensionality. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0235-6

Piantadosi, S. T. (2021). The computational origin of representation. Minds and Machines. Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and Cognitive Science, 31(1), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09540-9

Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). What’s in your mind? En Lepore, E. y Pylyshyn, Z. (eds.), What is cognitive science (p. 1-25). Wiley-Blackwell.

Ramsey, W. M. (2007). Representation revisited. Cambridge University Press.

Ramsey, W. 2017. Must cognition be representational? Synthese, 194, 4197–4214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0644-6

Read, C. y Szokolszky, A. (2020). Ecological psychology and enactivism: Perceptuallyguided action vs. sensation-based enaction. Frontiers of Psychology, 14(11), 1270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01270

Rescorla, R. A. (2003). Contemporary study of Pavlovian conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600005333

Ribes, E. (2018). El estudio científico de la conducta individual. Una introducción a la teoría de la psicología. Manual Moderno.

Rivière, A. (1991). Orígenes históricos de la psicología cognitiva: paradigma simbólico y procesamiento de la información. Anuario de Psicología, 51, 129-155. https://doi.org/10.1344/%25x

Roca, J. (2006). Psicología: una introducción teórica. Documenta Universitaria.

Röck, T. (2017). Brentano’s methodology as a path through the divide: On combining phenomenological descriptions and logical analysis. Axiomathes, 27, 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-017-9349-z

Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. y pdp Research Group (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1. mit Press.

Rupert, R. D. (2018). Representation and mental representation. Philosophical Explorations, 21(2), 204-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2018.1477979

Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Hutchinson & Co.

Schlinger, H. D. (2004). Why psychology hasn’t kept its promises. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 25(2), 123–144. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43854026

Schlinger, H. D. Jr. y Poling, A. D. (1998). Introduction to scientific psychology. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1893-2

Skinner, B. F. (1963). Behaviorism at fifty. Science, 140, 951-958. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.140.3570.951

Smith, G. (2017). Brentano and Freud: intentionality and representational theory in “Zur Auffassung der Aphasien” (1891). Revista Guaricá de Filosofía, 33(2), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.5935/2179-9180.20170010

Sober, E. (1980). Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism. Philosophy of Science, 47(3), 350–383. http://www.jstor.org/stable/186950

Staddon, J. E. R. (2001). Adaptive dynamics. The theoretical analysis of behavior. The mit Press.

Stitch, S. (1996). Deconstructing the mind. Oxford University Press.

Ter Hark, M. (1990). Beyond the inner and the outer. Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology. Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2089-7

Timberlake W. (1993). Behavior systems and reinforcement: An integrative approach. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60(1), 105-28. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-105

Turbayne, C. M. (1970). The myth of metaphor. University of South Carolina Press.

Valsiner, J. (2014). Irreversibility of time and ontopotentiality of signs. Estudios de Psicología, 23(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093902753535187

van Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be, if not computation? The Journal of Philosophy, 92(7), 345–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2941061

Varela, F., Thompson, E. y Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. mit Press.

von Wright, G. H. (1979). Explicación y comprensión. Alianza. Publicado originalmente en 1971.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. En R.W. Rieber (ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (M. J. Hall, Trad.). Plenum Press.

Ward, D., Silverman, D. y Villalobos, M. (2017). Introduction: The varieties of enactivism. Topoi, 36, 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9484-6

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Basil Blackwell.

Yela, M. (1996). La evolución del conductismo. Psicothema, 8, suplem., 165-186. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/657.pdf