Non-mediational Psychologies: Introduction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.e350951Keywords:
Mediational Psychologies, Nonmediational Psychologies, Antirepresentationalism, Behaviorism, Radical Embodied Cognition, EnactivismAbstract
The article aims to introduce non-mediational approaches in psychology and serve as a context to understand the debate to which Josep Roca i Balasch, José Enrique Burgos Triano and Pablo Covarrubias were invited in this monographic issue. It begins by characterizing what is central to mediational psychologies to understand what non-mediational psychologies are opposed to. Subsequently, it offers a genealogical map of this family of approaches, which serves to understand the network of influences among various authors, including those invited to this issue. Next, it presents the main arguments put forward by non-mediational psychologies, highlighting that not all authors necessarily accept all arguments. Finally, a brief biographical review of the invited authors and the structure of the monographic issue are presented.
Downloads
References
Adams, F. y Aizawa, K. (2010). The bounds of cognition. 2da. Ed. Blackwell.
Alksnis, N. y Reynolds, J. (2019). Revaluing the behaviorist ghost in enactivism and embodied cognition. Synthese, 198, 5785–5807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02432-1
Baggs, E. y Chemero, A. (2021). Radical embodiment in two directions. Synthese, 198, 2175–2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02020-9
Bever, T. G., Fodor, J. A. y Garrett, M. (1968). A formal limitation of associationism. En Dixon, R. y Horton, D. L. (Eds.), Verbal behavior and general behavior theory. Prentice-Hall.
Brentano, F. (1973). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. [La psicología desde el punto de vista empírico]. Meiner. Publicado originalmente en 1874.
Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. mit Press.
Corris, A. y Chemero, A. (2022). Embodiment and enactivism. En B. D., Young y C. D. Jennings (eds.), Mind, cognition, and neuroscience: A philosophical introduction. Routledge.
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Columbia University Press.
Clark, A. (1997). Being there. mit Press.
Covarrubias, P., Cabrera, F. y Jiménez, Á. A. (2017). Invariants and information pickup in The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems: Implications for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Ecological Psychology, 29(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2017.1332460
Day, W. F. (1969). Radical behaviorism in reconciliation with phenomenology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(2), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-315
De Sousa, L. B. y Gabriel, R. (2015). Does the mental lexicon exist? Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 23(2), 335-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237.2083.23.2.335-361
Di Paolo, E. A., Buhrmann, T. y Barandiaran, X. E. (2017). Sensorimotor life: An enactive proposal. Oxford University Press.
Dietrich, (2007). Representation. En P. Thagard (Ed.). Philosophy of psychology and cognitive science. (pp. 1- 29). Elsevier.
Dołęga, K. y Schlicht, T. (2022). Mental content. En B. J. Young y C. D. Jennings (eds.), Mind, cognition and neuroscience: A philosophical introduction (pp. 199-213). Routledge.
Donahoe, J.W. y Palmer, D.C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Allyn and Bacon.
Fodor, J. (1981). The mind-body problem. Scientific American, 244(1), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0181-114
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Goldstein, E. B. (2011). Cognitive psychology. Connecting mind, research and everyday experience. 3rd. ed. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Hutto, D. y Myin, E. (2019). Evolving enactivism: basic minds meet content. mit Press.
Kantor, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioral psychology: A sample of scientific system construction. Principia Press.
Killeen, P. R. (2019). Timberlake’s theories dissolve anomalies. Behavioural Processes, 166, 103894, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103894
Klein, S. B. (2015). What memory is. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1333
Leudar, I. y Costall, A. (2009). Against Theory of Mind. Plagrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234383
Machado, A., Guilhardi, P., Caetano, M.S. y Silva, F. J. (2020). Rules of conduct for Behavior Analysts in the presence of hypothetical constructs: a commentary on Eckard and Lattal (2020). Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43(4), 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-020-00272-w
Menary, R. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9187-6
Morris, E. K. (2003). Behavior analysis and a modern psychology: Programs of direct action. En K. A. Lattal y P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 275–298). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
Morris, E. K. (2009). Behavior analysis and ecological psychology: past, present, and future. a review of Harry Heft’s Ecological Psychology in context. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 92(2), 275-304. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2009.92-275.
Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Harvard University Press.
Palmer, D. C. y Donahoe, J. W. (1992). Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. The American Psychologist, 47(11), 1344–1358. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.47.11.1344
Pérez-Almonacid, R. (2018). Los límites de la integración teórica en psicología. En G. Gutiérrez (comp.). Teorías en psicología. Integración y el futuro de la disciplina (p.24-67). Manual Moderno.
Pérez-Almonacid, R. (2019). A non-mediational approach to emotions and feelings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00181
Pérez-Almonacid, R. (2021). Heidegger and psychological behavior. Ideas. Revista de Ciencia del Comportamiento. https://www.ideiasjournal.com/articulo?id=1637344754642
Pérez-Álvarez, M. y Sass, L. A. (2008). Phenomenology and behaviorism: A mutual readjustment. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 15(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.0.0194
Perner, J. y Leahy, B. (2015). Mental files in development: Dual naming, false belief, identity, and intensionality. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0235-6
Piantadosi, S. T. (2021). The computational origin of representation. Minds and Machines. Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and Cognitive Science, 31(1), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09540-9
Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). What’s in your mind? En Lepore, E. y Pylyshyn, Z. (eds.), What is cognitive science (p. 1-25). Wiley-Blackwell.
Ramsey, W. M. (2007). Representation revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Ramsey, W. 2017. Must cognition be representational? Synthese, 194, 4197–4214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0644-6
Read, C. y Szokolszky, A. (2020). Ecological psychology and enactivism: Perceptuallyguided action vs. sensation-based enaction. Frontiers of Psychology, 14(11), 1270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01270
Rescorla, R. A. (2003). Contemporary study of Pavlovian conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600005333
Ribes, E. (2018). El estudio científico de la conducta individual. Una introducción a la teoría de la psicología. Manual Moderno.
Rivière, A. (1991). Orígenes históricos de la psicología cognitiva: paradigma simbólico y procesamiento de la información. Anuario de Psicología, 51, 129-155. https://doi.org/10.1344/%25x
Roca, J. (2006). Psicología: una introducción teórica. Documenta Universitaria.
Röck, T. (2017). Brentano’s methodology as a path through the divide: On combining phenomenological descriptions and logical analysis. Axiomathes, 27, 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-017-9349-z
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. y pdp Research Group (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1. mit Press.
Rupert, R. D. (2018). Representation and mental representation. Philosophical Explorations, 21(2), 204-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2018.1477979
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Hutchinson & Co.
Schlinger, H. D. (2004). Why psychology hasn’t kept its promises. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 25(2), 123–144. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43854026
Schlinger, H. D. Jr. y Poling, A. D. (1998). Introduction to scientific psychology. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1893-2
Skinner, B. F. (1963). Behaviorism at fifty. Science, 140, 951-958. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.140.3570.951
Smith, G. (2017). Brentano and Freud: intentionality and representational theory in “Zur Auffassung der Aphasien” (1891). Revista Guaricá de Filosofía, 33(2), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.5935/2179-9180.20170010
Sober, E. (1980). Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism. Philosophy of Science, 47(3), 350–383. http://www.jstor.org/stable/186950
Staddon, J. E. R. (2001). Adaptive dynamics. The theoretical analysis of behavior. The mit Press.
Stitch, S. (1996). Deconstructing the mind. Oxford University Press.
Ter Hark, M. (1990). Beyond the inner and the outer. Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology. Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2089-7
Timberlake W. (1993). Behavior systems and reinforcement: An integrative approach. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60(1), 105-28. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-105
Turbayne, C. M. (1970). The myth of metaphor. University of South Carolina Press.
Valsiner, J. (2014). Irreversibility of time and ontopotentiality of signs. Estudios de Psicología, 23(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093902753535187
van Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be, if not computation? The Journal of Philosophy, 92(7), 345–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2941061
Varela, F., Thompson, E. y Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. mit Press.
von Wright, G. H. (1979). Explicación y comprensión. Alianza. Publicado originalmente en 1971.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. En R.W. Rieber (ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (M. J. Hall, Trad.). Plenum Press.
Ward, D., Silverman, D. y Villalobos, M. (2017). Introduction: The varieties of enactivism. Topoi, 36, 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9484-6
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Basil Blackwell.
Yela, M. (1996). La evolución del conductismo. Psicothema, 8, suplem., 165-186. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/657.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Texts submitted for evaluation to the Journal of Psychology of the University of Antioquia must have never been published before, nor been accepted for future publication by any other journal.
Upon the Journal’s acceptance for publication of submitted material, the author partially transfers his/her rights on the article, preserving those relative to its non-commercial use and academic circulation as a free-access file.
Except if otherwise decided, this Journal’s content is covered by a Creative Commons licence “Attribution - Non-commercial – share a like” Colombia 4.0. The licence can be checked out here.
