Cognitive Therapies: Myths and Controversial Aspects

Authors

  • Alberto Ferrer Botero Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.10232

Keywords:

Cognitive Therapy, Cognitive Model, Methodology, Cognitive Approach of Clinical Cases

Abstract

This paper focuses on four myths and controversial issues about cognitive therapy. The first of these controversial issues is the idea that cognitive therapies are just a technique of cognitive restructuring that belongs to the behavior modification therapies, and that because this is does not have its own theoretical model or a methodology. The second contentious issue refers to the idea that for the cognitive therapies the cause of human behavior and emotions is just the thinking process. The third controversial issue originates on the false idea that cognitive therapists disrespect their patients imposes their criteria on them. For the discussion of the fourth contentious issue it is showed as untrue that the cognitive therapies forget human beings non-rational aspects, and that they do not pretend to turn humans into cold and logical processors of information.

|Abstract
= 1210 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 792 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2011-09-29

How to Cite

Ferrer Botero, A. (2011). Cognitive Therapies: Myths and Controversial Aspects. Revista De Psicología Universidad De Antioquia, 2(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.10232

Issue

Section

Revisión de Tema

Most read articles by the same author(s)