Power Asymmetries, Resistance and Victims´Rights regarding “Justice and Peace” Trials

Authors

  • Gabriel Ignacio Gómez Sánchez Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.14142

Keywords:

Transitional justice from below, human rights, Human Rights Networks, resistance

Abstract

It has been almost a decade since the government of Alvaro Uribe started the peace process with the paramilitary forces, and more than six years since the “justice and peace” trials started. Human rights reports manifest the concern of human rights and victims organizations about the poor outcomes of the trials considering the weak level of protection of victims´ rights. These observations request to assess the sufficiency of judicial mechanisms to protect the rights of truth, justice and reparation in a context of a persisting political conflict. Based on a sociolegal research about the recent Colombian experience on the framing and application of mechanisms of transitional justice, the article attempts to analyze the relations between politics and law regarding the application of “justice and peace” trials. The article addresses two main findings. First, different forms of political asymmetries between demobilized paramilitary members and victims of gross violations of human rights have been reproduced within the “justice and peace” trials, and second, human rights networks have deployed actions of political and legal resistance in order to protect victims´ rights.

|Abstract
= 595 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 211 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gabriel Ignacio Gómez Sánchez, Universidad de Antioquia

Associate Professor Faculty of Law and Political Sciences of the University of Antioquia. Member of the Law and Society group. PhD in Justice Studies and Social Research from Arizona State University

References

BOURDIEU, Pierre and WACQUANT, Loic.An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1992.

BOURDIEU, Pierre.La Fuerza del Derecho: hacia una sociología del campo jurídico. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes – Siglo del Hombre Editores, 2001.

CAPPELLETTI, Mauro y GARTH, Bryant El Acceso a la Justicia. La tendencia en el movimiento mundial para hacer efectivos los derechos. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica,1996.

COMISIÓN COLOMBIANA DE JURISTAS.Colombia: El espejismo de la justicia y la paz, Balance sobre la aplicación de la ley 975 de 2005. Bogotá:CCJ, 2007.

COMISIÓN COLOMBIANA DE JURISTAS.Colombia: La metáfora del desmantelamiento de los grupos paramilitares. Segundo informe de balance sobre la aplicación de la ley 975 de 2005. Bogotá: CCJ, 2010.

CORPORACIÓN NUEVO ARCO IRIS.Parapolítica, la ruta de la expansión paramilitar y los acuerdos políticos. Bogotá: Intermedio Editores, 2007.

DÍAZ. Catalina. Challenging Impunity from Below: The Contested Ownership of Transitional Justice in Colombia. En: Transitional Justice from Below, Grassroots Activism and the Struggles for Change.Oxford y Portland:Hart Publishing, 2008.

ELSTER, Jon.Closing the Books.Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective.Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 2004. Fundación Social.Tramite de la ley de Justicia y Paz. Bogotá:Fundación Social, 2006.

GALANTER, Marc. Por qué los ‘poseedores’ salen adelante: especulaciones sobre los límites del cambio jurídico. En: GARCÍA, Mauricio (ed), Sociología Jurídica, Teoría y sociología del derecho en Estados Unidos.Bogotá. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2001.

GOODALE, Mark y MERRY, Sally Engle (eds). The Practice of Human Rights, Tracking Law Between the Global and the Local.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

KAIRYS, David (ed), The Politics of Law, A progressive critique.New York: Basic Books, 1998.

KECK, Margaret y SIKKINK, Kathryn. Activists Beyond Borders: Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Politics.Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.

Published

2012-01-30

How to Cite

Gómez Sánchez, G. I. (2012). Power Asymmetries, Resistance and Victims´Rights regarding “Justice and Peace” Trials. Estudios De Derecho, 69(153), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.14142