¿Do science teachers atribute the same characteristics and uses to the cartesian graphics as textbooks authors do?
Keywords:
Cartesian graphs, teaching of sciences, chemistry textbooksAbstract
This article presents a study on the characteristics and the uses of Cartesian graphs preferred and attributed by chemistry teachers, in comparison to those of the authors of textbooks.
How to reference this article:
GARCÍA GARCÍA, José Joaquín y PERALES PALACIOS, Francisco Javier, “¿Atribuyen los profesores de ciencias las mismas características y usos a las gráficas cartesianas que los autores de los textos?”, Revista Educación y Pedagogía, Medellín, Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Educación, vol. XVII, núm. 43, (septiembre-diciembre), 2005, pp. 81-89.
Received: november 2005
Accepted: december 2005
Downloads
References
AINLEY, J.; NADI, H. y PRATT, D., 2000, “The construction of meaning for trend in active graphing”, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, núm. 5, pp. 85-114.
ANDERSON, R. F. y HELSTRUP, T., 1993, “Visual Discovery in mind and on Paper ”, Memory and Cognition, vol. 21, núm. 3, pp. 283- 293.
BASTIDE, F, 1990, “The Iconography of Scientific Texts: Principles of Analysis”. en: LYNCH, M. y WOOLGAR, S., eds., Representation in Scientific Practice, Cambrigde, MA, MIT Press, pp. 187-229.
BERG, C. A. y SMITH, P., 1994, “Assesing Students’ Abilities to Construct and Interpret Line Graphs: Disparities Between Multiple —Choice and Free— Response Instruments”, Science Education, vol. 78, núm. 6, pp. 527-554.
BLUBAUGH, W. L. y EMMONS, K., 1999, “Algebra for All. Graphing for All Students”, Mathematics Teacher, vol. 92, núm. 4, pp. 323-334.
EVEN, R., 1989, Prospective Secondary Mathematics Teacher, Knowledge and Understanding about Mathematical Functions, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State, University East Lansing.
GARCÍA, J. J. y CERVANTES A., 2004, “Las representaciones gráficas cartesianas en los libros de texto de ciencia”, Alambique, núm. 41, pp. 99-108.
GROSSMAN, P. L., 1987, A Tale of Two Teachers: The Role of Subject Matter Orientation in Teaching, Paper Presented an the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington D. C.
GROSSMAN, P. L. y GUDMUNDSDOTTIR, S., 1987, Teachers and Texts: An Expert / Novice Comparison in English, Paper Presented an the Annual Meting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington D. C.
KOZMA, R., 2003, “The Material Features of Multiple Representations and their Cognitive and Social Affordances for Science Understanding”, Learning and Instruction, vol. 13, núm. 2, pp. 205-226.
LATOUR, B., 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Milton Keynes, comp., Open University Press.
LATOUR, B. y WOOLGAR, S., 1986, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of the Scientific Facts, Princeton, N. J., Princeton University Press.
LEMKE, J. L., 1998, “Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text”, en: MARTIN, J. R. y VEEL, R., eds., Reading Science, Londres, Routledge, pp. 87-113.
LESH, R.; POST, T. y BERH, M., 1987, “Representations and Translations among Representations in Mathematics learning and Problem solving”, en: JANVIER, C., eds., Problems of Representation in teaching and learning of Mathematic, Hillsdale, N. J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
LYNCH, M., 1985, Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science. A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in Laboratory, Londres, Routledge Kegan & Paul,
PADILLA, M. J.; McKENZIE, D. L. y SHAWN, E. L., Jr., 1986, “An examination of the line graphing ability of students in grades seven throught twelve”, School Science and Mathematics, vol. 86, núm 1, pp. 20-25.
PRATT, D., 1995, “Young Children´ s Active and Passive Graphing”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, núm. 11, pp. 157-169.
REISBERG, D., 1987, “External Representations and Advantages of the Externalizing One´ Thoughts”, en: Proceeding of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hilsdale, N. J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 281-293.
ROTH, W. M. y BOWEN, G. M., 1999a, “Of Cannibals, Missionaries, and Converts: Graphing Competencies from Grade 89 to Professional Science Inside (Classroom) and Outside (Field / Laboratory)”, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 24, núm. 2, pp. 179-221.
___________ , 1999b, “Complexities of Graphical Representations during Ecology Lectures, an Analysis Rooted in Semiotics and Hermeneutic Fenomenology”, Learning and Instruction, núm. 9, pp. 235-255.
SCHANK, R. C., 1994, “Gola-based Scenarios: a Radical Look at Education”, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, núm. 3, pp. 429-453.
SHULMAN, L. S., 1986, “Those Who Understand: knowledge Growth in Teaching”, Educational Researcher, vol. 15, núm, 2, pp. 4-14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
