Analysis of drying kinetic of brewer´s spent grains: effect of the temperature on the physical properties and the content of bioactive compounds

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v30n2a351025

Keywords:

Brewer´s spent grain, dry kinetics, diffusion, polyphenols, ultrasound-assisted extraction, by-products valorization

Abstract

Background: Brewer´s spent grain (BSG) is a biomass by-product generated in large volumes during industrial beer production. BSG has become a growing environmental problem, as most breweries discard it inappropriately, negatively impacting the environment. Alternatives for the exploitation of this by-product have consisted of elaborating food supplements for farm animals, obtaining biofuels, developing adsorbents, and obtaining substances for the food industry. However, the high moisture content in BSG (approximately 70%), poses a significant challenge in exploring various reuse alternatives. Therefore, the implementation of a pre-drying process becomes essential.
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the BSG drying kinetics at different temperatures and the effect of the drying temperature on the physical properties and the content of bioactive compounds.
Methods: BSG samples were dried at different temperatures (50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 105°C) and analyzed for their moisture ratio, water activity, total polyphenol content (TPC), and DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazil) radical scavenging activity. Also, four kinetics models were fitted to the drying data.
Results: It was determined that the effective diffusivity was between 5.23x10-10 (m2/s) and 2.49x10-09 (m2/s), and the value of the activation energy was 28.05 kJ/mol. In addition, it was found that the content of phenolic compounds (1.27±0.120 mg gallic acid equivalents /g) and the DPPH radical scavenging activity (0.21±0.015 mg gallic acid equivalents /g) were not significantly affected by the variation in the drying temperatures studied.
Conclusions: From an operational point of view, the most suitable temperature for the drying process of BSG was 105°C since it would allow to reach shorter drying times, and the TPC was not affected markedly by the range of temperature studied.

|Abstract
= 476 veces | PDF
= 268 veces| | HTML
= 4 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gómez-Corona C, Escalona-Buendía H, García M, Chollet S, Valentin D. Craft vs. industrial: Habits, attitudes and motivations towards beer consumption in Mexico. Appetite. 2016;96:358–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.002

Villacreces S, Blanco C, Caballero I. Developments and characteristics of craft beer production processes. Food Biosci. 2022;45:101495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101495

Melewar T, Skinner H. Territorial brand management: Beer, authenticity, and sense of place. J Bus Res. 2020;116:680–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.038

Anderson H, Santos I, Hildenbrand Z, Schug K. A review of the analytical methods used for beer ingredient and finished product analysis and quality control. Anal Chim Acta. 2019;1085:1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.07.061

Mussatto S, Dragone G, Roberto I. Brewers’ spent grain: Generation, characteristics and potential applications. J Cereal Sci. 2006;43(1):1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2005.06.001

Sganzerla W, Ampese L, Mussatto S, Forster-Carneiro T. A bibliometric analysis on potential uses of brewer’s spent grains in a biorefinery for the circular economy transition of the beer industry. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 2021;15(6):1965–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2290

Wagner E, Pería M, Ortiz G, Rojas N, Ghiringhelli P. Valorization of brewer’s spent grain by different strategies of structural destabilization and enzymatic saccharification. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113329

Statista. Statista.com. Leading 10 countries in worldwide beer production in 2020. 2020 [cited 2022 Feb 28]. Available from: https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/1147467/lideres-produccion-cerveza-mundial/

Contreras M, Lama-Muñoz A, Romero-García J, García-Vargas M, Romero I, Castro E. Production of renewable products from brewery spent grains. Waste Biorefinery. Elsevier Inc.; 2021. 305–347 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821879-2/00011-9

Chetrariu A, Dabija A. Brewer’s spent grains: Possibilities of valorization, a review. Applied Sciences. 2020;10(16):1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165619

Mussatto S, Fernandes M, Rocha G, Órfão J, Teixeira J, Roberto I. Production, characterization and application of activated carbon from Brewer’s spent grain lignin. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(7):2450–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.025

Antar M, Lyu D, Nazari M, Shah A, Zhou X, Smith D. Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021;139:110691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110691

Patermann C, Aguilar A. A bioeconomy for the next decade. EFB Bioeconomy Journal. 2021;1:100005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeco.2021.100005

Brandão A, Gonçalves A, Santos J. Circular bioeconomy strategies: From scientific research to commercially viable products. J Clean Prod. 2021;295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126407

Hadley E, Hartley S, McLeod C, Polson P. The Sustainable Path to a Circular Bioeconomy. Trends Biotechnol. 2021;39(6):542–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.10.015

Stegmann P, Londo M, Junginger M. The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X. 2020;6:100029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100029

Kao T. Health Potential for Beer Brewing Byproducts. Current Topics on Superfoods. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76126

Maqhuzu A, Yoshikawa K, Takahashi F. Prospective utilization of brewers’ spent grains (BSG) for energy and food in Africa and its global warming potential. Sustain Prod Consum. 2020;26:146–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.022

Mallen E, Najdanovic-Visak V. Brewers’ spent grains: Drying kinetics and biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2018;1:16–23. DOI: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589014X18300057

Rojas-Chamorro J, Cara C, Romero I, Ruiz E, Romero-García J, Mussatto S. Ethanol Production from Brewers’ Spent Grain Pretreated by Dilute Phosphoric Acid. Energy and Fuels. 2018;32(4):5226–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00343

Cancelliere R, Carbone K, Pagano M, Cacciotti I, Micheli L. Biochar from Brewers’ Spent Grain: A Green and Low-Cost Smart Material to Modify Screen-Printed Electrodes. Biosensors. 2019;9(4):139. DOI: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/9/4/139

Gonçalves G, Nakamura P, Furtado D, Veit M. Utilization of brewery residues to produces granular activated carbon and bio-oil. J Clean Prod. 2017;168:908–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.089

Thai S, Avena-Bustillos R, Alves P, Pan J, Osorio-Ruiz A, Miller J. Influence of drying methods on health indicators of brewers spent grain for potential upcycling into food products. Applied Food Research. 2022;2(1):100052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2022.100052

Singh A, Mandal R, Shojaei M, Singh A, Kowalczewski P, Ligaj M. Novel drying methods for sustainable upcycling of brewers’ spent grains as a plant protein source. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093660

Mussatto S. Brewer’s spent grain: A valuable feedstock for industrial applications. J Sci Food Agric. 2014;94(7):1264–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6486

Kong D, Wang Y, Li M, Liu X, Huang M, Li X. Analysis of drying kinetics, energy and microstructural properties of turnips using a solar drying system. Solar Energy. 2021;230:721–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.10.073

Hasibuan R, Sari W, Manurung R, Alexande V. Drying Kinetic Models of Rice Applying Fluidized Bed Dryer. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems. 2023 28;10(1):334–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.100138

Perazzini H, Perazzini M, Freire F, Freire F, Freire J. Modeling and cost analysis of drying of citrus residues as biomass in rotary dryer for bioenergy. Renew Energy. 2021;175:167–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.144

Dhurve P, Kumar V, Kumar D, Malakar S. Drying kinetics, mass transfer parameters, and specific energy consumption analysis of watermelon seeds dried using the convective dryer. Mater Today Proc. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.008

Huang D, Yang P, Tang X, Luo L, Sunden B. Application of infrared radiation in the drying of food products. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;110:765–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.039

Ertekin C, Firat MZ. A comprehensive review of thin-layer drying models used in agricultural products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(4):701–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2014.910493

Alean J, Maya JC, Chejne F. Mathematical model for the mass transport in multiple porous scales. J Food Eng. 2018;233:28–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.03.024

Chen D, Zheng Y, Zhu X. Determination of effective moisture diffusivity and drying kinetics for poplar sawdust by thermogravimetric analysis under isothermal condition. Bioresour Technol. 2012;107:451–5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.032

Vega-Gálvez A, Miranda M, Díaz LP, Lopez L, Rodriguez K, di Scala K. Effective moisture diffusivity determination and mathematical modelling of the drying curves of the olive-waste cake. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(19):7265–70. DOI: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960852410007224

Crank J. The mathematics of diffusion. 2nd ed. Oxford university press; 1979.

Hall KR, Eagleton LC, Acrivos A, Vermeulen T. Pore- and solid-diffusion kinetics in fixed-bed adsorption under constant-pattern conditions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals. 1966;5(2):212–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/i160018a011

Arranz JI, Miranda MT, Sepúlveda FJ, Montero I, Rojas CV. Analysis of Drying of Brewers’ Spent Grain. Proc West Mark Ed Assoc Conf. 2018;2(23):1467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2231467

Shroti GK, Saini CS. Development of edible films from protein of brewer’s spent grain: Effect of pH and protein concentration on physical, mechanical and barrier properties of films. Applied Food Research. 2022;2(1):100043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2022.100043

Medina-Jaramillo C, Quintero-Pimiento C, Díaz-Díaz D, Goyanes S, López-Córdoba A. Improvement of andean blueberries postharvest preservation using carvacrol/alginate-edible coatings. Polymers. 2020;12(10):1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102352

Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 1995;28(1):25–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5

Ghanem N, Mihoubi D, Bonazzi C, Kechaou N, Boudhrioua N. Drying Characteristics of Lemon By-product (Citrus limon. v. lunari): Effects of Drying Modes on Quality Attributes Kinetics’. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2020;11(1):303–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0381-z

Bryś A, Kaleta A, Górnicki K, Głowacki S, Tulej W, Bryś J. Some Aspects of the Modelling of Thin-Layer Drying of Sawdust. Energies. 2021;14(3):726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030726

Hussain M, Zabiri H, Tufa LD, Yusup S, Ali I. A kinetic study and thermal decomposition characteristics of palm kernel shell using model-fitting and model-free methods. Biofuels. 2022;13(1):105–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2019.1642642

Arranz JI, Sepúlveda FJ, Montero I, Romero P, Miranda MT. Feasibility analysis of brewers’ spent grain for energy use: Waste and experimental pellets. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062740

Sozzi A, Zambon M, Mazza G, Salvatori D. Fluidized bed drying of blackberry wastes: Drying kinetics, particle characterization and nutritional value of the obtained granular solids. Powder Technol. 2021;385:37–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.02.058

Lopez A, Iguaz A, Esnoz A, Virseda P. Thin-layer drying behaviour of vegetable wastes from wholesale market. Drying Technology. 2000;18(4–5):995–1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930008917749

Maia GD, Horta ACL, Felizardo MP. From the conventional to the intermittent biodrying of orange solid waste biomass. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification. 2023;188:109361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2023.109361

EL-Mesery HS, El-khawaga SE. Drying process on biomass: Evaluation of the drying performance and energy analysis of different dryers. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2022;33:101953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.101953

Ahmad-Qasem MH, Barrajon-Catalan E, Micol V, Cárcel JA, Garcia-Perez J. Influence of air temperature on drying kinetics and antioxidant potential of olive pomace. J Food Eng. 2013;119(3):516–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.06.027

Şahin Fİ, Acaralı N. Effective moisture diffusivity and activation energy during convective drying of bread containing clove oil/orange oil. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society. 2023;100(3):100952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jics.2023.100952

Yan Y, Qi B, Zhang W, Wang X, Mo Q. Investigations into the drying kinetics of biomass in a fluidized bed dryer using electrostatic sensing and digital imaging techniques. Fuel. 2022;308:122000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122000

Lemus‐Mondaca R, Zura‐Bravo L, Ah‐Hen K, Di Scala K. Effect of drying methods on drying kinetics, energy features, thermophysical and microstructural properties of Stevia rebaudiana leaves. J Sci Food Agric. 2021;101(15):6484–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11320

Yan Z, Zhou Z, Jiao Y, Huang J, Yu Z, Zhang D, et al. Hot-Air Drying Significantly Improves the Quality and Functional Activity of Orange Black Tea Compared with Traditional Sunlight Drying. Foods. 2023;12(9):1913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12091913

Bai T, Wan Q, Liu X, Ke R, Xie Y, Zhang T. Drying kinetics and attributes of fructus aurantii processed by hot air thin-layer drying at different temperatures. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e15554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15554

Kaveh M, Golpour I, Gonçalves JC, Ghafouri S, Guiné R. Determination of drying kinetics, specific energy consumption, shrinkage, and colour properties of pomegranate arils submitted to microwave and convective drying. Open Agric. 2021;6(1):230–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2020-0209

Wan Nadhari WNA, Hashim R, Danish M, Sulaiman O, Hiziroglu S. A Model of Drying Kinetics of Acacia mangium Wood at Different Temperatures. Drying Technology. 2014;32(3):361–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2013.829855

Nahar N, Hazra S, Raychaudhuri U, Adhikari S. Effect of different drying methods on drying kinetics, modeling, energy‐economic, texture profile, color, and antioxidant of lotus rhizomes (Nelumbo nucifera). J Food Process Preserv. 2022;46(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.16842

Huang D, Men K, Li D, Wen T, Gong Z, Sunden B. Application of ultrasound technology in the drying of food products. Ultrason Sonochem. 2020;63:104950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104950

Drying curves of Brewer´s spent grain (BSG) using the different temperatures studied (experimental points).

Downloads

Published

11-08-2023

How to Cite

Gomez-Delgado, E., Medina-Jaramillo, C., & López-Córdoba, A. (2023). Analysis of drying kinetic of brewer´s spent grains: effect of the temperature on the physical properties and the content of bioactive compounds. Vitae, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v30n2a351025

Issue

Section

Foods: Science, Engineering and Technology

Most read articles by the same author(s)