Doing ethnology with the Quirino caboclos: the ethnographic situation as a triad.

Authors

  • João Pacheco de Oliveira National Museum of Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.boan.6889

Keywords:

Brazilian anthropology, Amazonian ethnology, Ethnographic field work, Tikunas, Nimuendaju

Abstract

Abstract. The article attempts a critical review of the ethnographic journeys of the German ethnologist, Curt Unkel —Nimuendaju, the name the indigenous peoples attached to him—, among the Tikuna of the Brazilian Amazonian jungle. The article examines primary sources that document the objectives of these experiences, framing them in a reflection regarding the ethnographic exercise which should be understood from the complex interactions that comprise it and from which we should transcend the classic duality investigator/investigated. In the case of Nimuendaju, his approximation to the indigenous question was crossed with state and rubber baron interests, values, and perspectives, the latter of whom were convinced that the jungle was not inhabited by “indios” rather “caboclos” that belonged to algún barracón.

|Abstract
= 191 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 133 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

João Pacheco de Oliveira, National Museum of Rio de Janeiro

Professor of the Department of Anthropology Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro
E-mail: j.pacheco@superig.com.br

References

Apel, Karl-Otto (2000). “A comunidade de comunicação como pressuposto transcendental das ciências sociais”. En: Transformação da Filosofia II. O a priori da comunidade de comunicação. Edições Loyola, São Paulo.

Baldus, Herbert (1945). “Curt Nimuendajú”. En: Boletim Bibliográfico, São Paulo, Vol. VIII.

Bellah, Robert N. (1983). “The ethical aims of social inquiry”. En: Social Science as moral inquiry.Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 362-381.

Bensa, Alban (1985). “Quand les canaques prennent la parole”. En: Actes de la Recherche, Paris, N.o 6, pp. 69-83.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1966). “Champ intellectuel et projet créateur”. En: Les Temps Modernes, N.o 246, pp. 865-906.

Cardoso de Oliveira, Roberto (1998). O Trabalho do Antropólogo. Editora da UNESP/Paralelo 15, São Paulo.____________ (1964). O índio no

mundo dos brancos. Difel, São Paulo.

Cardoso de Oliveira, Roberto y Oliveira, Luis R. (1996) Ensaios Antropológicos sobre Moral e Ética.Tempo Brasileiro, Rio de Janeiro.

Castro Faria, Luiz de (1981). “Curt Nimuendaju”. En: Mapa etno-histórico de Curt Nimuendaju. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estatística —FIBGE-Fundação Pró-memória, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 17-22.

Clifford, James (1989). The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth century ethnography, literature, and art. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

____________ (1980). “Fieldwork, reciprocity and the making of ethnographic texts”. En: Man, Londres, Vol. 3, N.o 15, pp. 518-532.

Comaroff, John y Jean (1992). Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Westview Press, Boulder-San Francisco-Oxford.

____________ (1991). Of Revelation and revolution: Christianity, Colonialism, and Counsciousness in South Africa. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Crapanzano, V. (1980). Tuhami portrait of a morocan. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Dumont, Jean-Paul (1978). The headman and I: ambiguity and ambivalence in the fieldworking expe-rience. University of Texas Press, Austin-Londres.

Emmerich, Charlotte y Leite, Yonne (1981). “A ortografia dos nomes tribais no mapa etno-histórico de Curt Nimuendaju”. En: Mapa etno-histórico de Curt Nimuendaju. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estatística —FIBGE-Fundação Pró-memória, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 29-35.

Fabian, Johannes (2000). Out of our minds: reason and madness in the exploration of Central Africa. Frankfurt University, Frankfurt.

____________ (1996). Remenbering the present: Painting and popular history in Zaire. Berkeley University Press, Los Angeles.

Gluckman, Max (1968). Analysis of a social situation in modern Zululand. Manchester University Press, Manchester.

Kuper, Adam (2005). “‘Today we have naming of parts’: The work of anthropologists in Southern Africa”. En: L’Estoile, B.; Neiburg, F. y Sigaud, L. (eds.). Empires, Nations, and Natives. An-thropology and the State-Making. Duke University Press, Durham-Londres, pp. 277-300.

____________ (1973). Anthropologists and Anthropology. The British School 1922-1972. Penguin, Londres.

Lima, Antonio Carlos de Souza (2005). “Indigenism in Brazil: The International Migration of State Policies”. En: L’Estoile, B.; Neiburg, F. y Sigaud, L. (eds.). Empires, Nations, and Natives. Anthropology and the State-Making. Duke University Press, Durham-Londres, pp. 197-222.

Malinowski, Bronislaw (1950). The argonauts of western Pacific. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Londres.

____________ (1949). The dynamics of culture changes: an inquiry into race relations in Africa. Yale University Press, New Haven.

____________ (1938). “Introductory Essay on The Anthropology of Changing African Cultures”. En: Mair, Lucy P. (ed.). Methods of Study of Cultural Contact in Africa. International Institute of African Languages and Cultures, Oxford University Press, Londres, pp. vii-xxxviii.

Marcus, George E. y Cushman, Dick (1982). “Ethnographies as text”. En: Annual Review of Antropology, Vol. 11, pp. 25-69.

Nimuendaju, Curt (1982). “Os índios ticuna. Relatório apresentado ao SPI/Amazonas-1929”. En: Suess, Paulo (org.). Textos indigenistas. Edições Loyola, São Paulo, pp. 192-208.

____________ (1952). The Tukuna. University of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles.

____________ (1948). “The Tukuna”. En: Steward, Julian H. (ed.). Handbook of South American Indians, Vol. 3, pp. 713-725.

Nunes Pereira, Manoel (1980). Moronguetá: um Decameron indígena. Civilização Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro.

____________ (1946). Curt Nimuendaju: síntese de uma vida e de uma obra. Belém do Pará, s. e.

Pacheco de Oliveira, João (2005). “The Anthropologist as Expert: Brazilian Ethnology between In-dianism and Indigenism” En: L’Estoile, B.; Neiburg, F. y Sigaud, L. (eds.). Empires, Nations, and Natives. Anthropology and the State-Making. Duke University Press, Durham-Londres, pp. 223-247.

____________ (org.) (1999). Ensaios em Antropologia Histórica. Editora da UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro.

____________ (1994). “A busca da salvação: ação indigenista e etnopolítica entre os ticuna”. En: Antropologia Social, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 4, pp. 81-110.

____________ (1988). “O nosso governo”: os ticuna e o regime tutelar. Marco Zero/CNPq, São Paulo.

____________ (1986). “O nosso governo”: os ticuna e o regime tutelar. Tesis de doctorado en antro-pología social. Museu Nacional/PPGAS, Rio de Janeiro.Peirano, Mariza (1992). Uma antropologia no plural. Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.

Pels, Peter y Salemink, Oscar (1999). Colonial Subjects: Essays on the practical history of anthropology. The University of Michigan Press, Michigan.

Ramos, R. (1990). “Etnology brazilian style”. En: Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 4, N.o 5, pp. 452-472.

Simmel, Georg (1950). “The triad”. En: Wolff, Kurt H. (org). The sociology of Georg Simmel. The Free Press, Glencoe (Illinois).

Stocking Jr., G. W. (1984). Functionalism Historicized. Essays on British Social Anthropology. The University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin.

____________ (1968). Race, culture, and evolution. The Free Press, New York.

Thomas, Nicholas (1994). Colonialism’s Culture: Anthropology, Travel, and Government. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.

Published

2010-09-09

How to Cite

Pacheco de Oliveira, J. (2010). Doing ethnology with the Quirino caboclos: the ethnographic situation as a triad. Boletín De Antropología, 20(37), 51–80. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.boan.6889

Issue

Section

Misceláneo