Evolución del Sistema General de Riesgos Profesionales, Colombia 1994 – 2004.

Romàn Orlando Restrepo Villa; Pascual Hernando Pérez Rivera; Martha Lucía Escobar Pérez

doi:10.17533/udea.rfnsp.1327

Evolution of the general system of occupational risks, Colombia 1994 – 2004

Authors

Romàn Orlando Restrepo Villa University of Antioquia
Pascual Hernando Pérez Rivera University of Antioquia
Martha Lucía Escobar Pérez University of Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.1327

Keywords:

Professional risks, Regulation, Insurance, Coverage, Universality

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the regulation and ensuring the General System of Occupational Hazards in Colombia

between 1994 and 2004. Methods: The evolution of regulation and its comparison with the principles of the

Colombian social security was made by documentary analysis. A quantitative analysis determined the evolution of the insurance of companies and workers, by the legal nature of the Management Occupational Risks companies and social variables. Results: The structural and fundamental aspects are the most regulated. Some themes have great repetition. Promotion, prevention and decentralization are less visible.

The efficiency and integrity principles are better developed. Solidarity, universality, unity and participation are under development. There is an increase of affiliated workers but a decrease of companies affiliated. The participation of the private companies increases and that of the public company decrease. The companies with more workers and more high quotes are affiliated to the assurances private companies. Discussion: The basic definitions are before the system. There are more regulations on the institutional arrangements and relationships between actors and less on conceptual and programmatic aspects in the promotion and prevention. Universality is threatened by economic and structural factors and by the same norms. The private participation is of great growth with a market approach toward the strongest sectors of the Colombian economy

|Abstract

= 360 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 71 veces|

Downloads

References

(1). Organización Internacional del Trabajo. Un reto universal: segu-ridad social para el mundo. Revista Trabajo 2003; 49:11

(2). Organización Mundial de la Salud, Organización Internacional del Trabajo. Comunicado conjunto OMS/Oficina Internacional del Trabajo 28 de abril de 2005. [Internet] Disponible en: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2005/pr18/es/index.html.

(3). República de Colombia, Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social. Riesgos Profesionales en cifras en Revista Seguridad Social al día. Cesantías 2002. Ed 29. p. 21.

(4). Organización Internacional de Trabajo. Administración de la Se-guridad Social. Ginebra; 1991. p.9.

(5). National Library of Medicine. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH®) Thesaurus. [Internet] [acceso 13 de septiembre de 2006] Disponible en: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/mesh.html.

(6). Organización Mundial de la Salud. Estrategia mundial sobre la salud ocupacional para todos. Recomendación de la segunda asamblea de los centros colaboradores en salud ocupacional de la OMS, 11-14 de octubre. Beijing; 1994

(7). Organización Internacional de Trabajo. “Convenio sobre seguri-dad y salud de los trabajadores C. 155”. Ginebra; 1981.

(8). Sanz J. Los filtros metodológicos: aplicación a la búsqueda bi-bliográfica en la medicina del trabajo española. En: Medicina y seguridad del trabajo 2008; 54 (211). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S0465-546X2008000200009

(9). Organización Internacional de Trabajo. Protocolo 155 relativo al convenio sobre seguridad social de los trabajadores, 1981, adoptado el 06 de agosto de 2002, en la conferencia 90 de la OIT. Ginebra. p.1

(10). Organización Internacional de Trabajo P155. p.1.

(11). Leon G. El Higienismo: “Un antecedente histórico de la seguridad social en Medellín 1886 – 1946”, en catilla de Seguridad Social. No. 1. 1996. p. 60.

(12). República de Colombia. Presidencia de la República. Ley 57 de 1915. Citada por: Ayala C. “Legislación en Salud ocupacional y Riesgos Profesionales”. 2ª ed. Bogotá: Ediciones salud laboral Ltda. p. 105

(13). Rodríguez O, Arévalo D. Estructura y Crisis de la Seguridad Social en Colombia 1946-1993. 1993. p. 111.

(14). Colombia. Presidencia de la República. Código Sustantivo del Trabajo, Art. 199. Bogotá: Presidencia de la República; 1950.

(15). República de Colombia. Código Sustantivo del Trabajo. Art. 200. Bogotá: Presidencia de la República; 1950.

(16). Cardona A, Nieto E, Arbeláez MP, Agudelo HB; Chávez, Monto-ya, Estrada A. Impacto de la reforma colombiana de la seguridad social sobre la dinámica y características del aseguramiento en salud. Revista Fac. Nac. Salud Pública 1999; 16(2):9

(17). Breman A. Shelton C. “Structural Adjustment and Health: A lite-rature review of the debate, its role-players and presented empirical evidence Paper No. WG6 : 6”. Comission on Macroecono-mics, Health-OMS; 2001

(18). Ibid., p. 26.

(19). Hernandez M. “Reforma Sanitaria, Equidad y Derecho a la Sa-lud: Cad. Saúde Pública 2001; 18(4):991-1001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2002000400007

(20). Colombia, Presidencia de la República. “Constitución Nacional”. Art. 48. Bogotá: Presidencia de la República; 1991

(21). Colombia, Presidencia de la República. Ley 100 de 1993, por la cual se establece el Sistema de Seguridad Social Integral. Bogotá: Presidencia de la República; 1993.

(22). Colombia. Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social. Decreto 1295 de 1994, por el cual se reglamenta el Sistema General de Riesgos Profesionales. Bogotá: El Ministerio; 1994.

(23). Colombia, Ministerio de Gobierno. Decreto 1295 de 1994, 22 de junio, por el cual se determina la organización y administración del Sistema General de Riesgos Profesionales. Bogotá: Minis-terio; 1994.

(24). República de Colombia. Decreto 1295 de 1994. Op.Cit. Art. 11.

(25). Rodríguez O, Arévalo D. Op. Cit. p.113

(26). Rodríguez de Villamil J. “Avance y perspectivas del Sistema Ge-neral de Riesgos Profesionales”. Seguridad Social al Día 2000; 21:18-24.

(27). Cediel BN, Villamil JL. Riesgo Biológico Ocupacional en la Me-dicina Veterinaria, Área de Intervención Prioritaria. Rev. salud pública 2004;6 (1):28-43

Downloads

PDF (Español (España))

Published

2009-09-15

How to Cite

Restrepo Villa RO, Pérez Rivera PH, Escobar Pérez ML. Evolution of the general system of occupational risks, Colombia 1994 – 2004. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública [Internet]. 2009 Sep. 15 [cited 2025 Mar. 9];27(2):1-13. Available from: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/1327

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 2 (2009)

Section

Topic review

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors

The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.

The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.

When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.

Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.

The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.

The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.

The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "