Health sector decentralization in Colombia: analysis of 91 cities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.279Keywords:
Principal component analysis, institutional development, community participation, decentralization, social security reform in healthcare, municipal developmentAbstract
Downloads
References
(1). Colombia. Congreso Ley 60 de 1993, agosto 12, Por lacual se dictan normas orgánicas sobre la distribución decompetencias de conformidad con los artículos 151 y 288de la Constitución Política y se distribuyen recursos según los artículos 356 y 357 de la Constitución Política yse dictan otras disposiciones. Bogotá: El Congreso; 1993.
(2). Colombia. Congreso. Ley 617 de 2000, octubre 6, Por lacual se reforma parcialmente la Ley 136 de 1994, el Decreto Extraordinario 1222 de 1986, se adiciona la LeyOrgánica de Presupuesto, el Decreto 1421 de 1993, sedictan otras normas tendientes a fortalecer la descentra-lización, y se dictan normas para la racionalización delgasto público nacional. Bogotá: El Congreso; 2000.
(3). Asociación Nacional de Secretarías de Salud, 2000.
(4). Colombia. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. Constitu-ción Política de Colombia. Bogotá: La Asamblea; 1991.
(5). Colombia. Congreso. Ley 10 de 1990, enero 10, por lacual se reorganiza el Sistema Nacional de Salud y se dictanotras disposiciones. Bogotá: El Congreso; 1990.
(6). Colombia. Congreso. Ley 100 de 1993, diciembre 23, por la cual se crea el sistema de seguridad social integral y se dictan otras disposiciones. Bogotá: El Congreso; 1993.
(7). Castañeda T, Beeharry G, Griffin C. Decentralization ofhealth services in Latin American countries: issues andsome lessons.Washington, D.C.: Banco Mundial; 1999.
(8). Burki SJ, Perry GE, Dillinger WR. Más allá del centro:la descentralización del Estado. Washington, D.C.: Banco Mundial; 1999.
(9). Gastor L. Management skills in decentralized environ-ment. Birmingham: University of Birmingham; 1995.
(10). Collins CD, Araújo J, Barbosa J. Decentralizing the heal-th sector: issues in Brazil. Health Policy 2000;52(2):113-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(00)00069-5
(11). Banco Mundial. World development report 1993: inves-ting in health. Washington, D.C.: Banco Mundial; 1993.
(12). Berman P. Health system reform in developing countries.Health Policy 1996;32:1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(95)90083-7
(13). Bloom G. Equity in health in unequal societies: meetinghealth needs in context of social change. Health Policy2001;57(3):205-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00121-X
(14). Islam A, Tahir MZ. Health sector reform in South Asia:new challenges and constrains. Health Policy2002;60(2):151-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00211-1
(15). Dye TR. Understanding public policy. Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1972.
(16). Jenkins WI. Policy Analysis: A political and organizatio-nal perspective. Nueva York: St. Martin’s Press, 1978.
(17). Anderson JE. Public policy making: an introduction. En:Howlett M, Ramesh M. (Eds). Studying Public Policy:policy cycles and policy subsystems.Toronto: OxfordUniversity; 1995.
(18). Hill M. The policy process. Nueva York: Michael Hill;1997.
(19). Vargas A. El Estado y las políticas públicas. Bogotá:Almudena; 1999.
(20). Pressman J, Wildavsky A. Implementation:How greatexpectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland: or,why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all, thisbeing a saga of the economic development administra-tion as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to.Berkeley: University of California; 1973.
(21). Walt G. Health policy: an introduction to process andpower. Londres: Zed Books; 1994.
(22). Powell M. An analysis of policy implementation in thethird world. Aldershot: Ashgate; 1999.
(23). Hogwood L. Why ‘perfect implementation’ is unattaina-ble p. 217-225. En: Hill M. Op. cit.
(24). Cheema GS, Rondinelli DA. (Eds). Decentralization anddevelopment: policy implementation in developingcountries.Londres: Sage; 1983.
(25). Rondinelli DA. Decentralizing urban development programs. A framework foranalyzing policy. Washington,D.C.: USAID; 1990.
(26). Collins C, Green A. Decentralization and primary healthcare in developing countries: ten key questions. J ManagMed 1993;72:58-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02689239310036963
(27). López MR. Fiscal decentralization in Latin America. Was-hington, DC: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; 1995.
(28). Montiel L. Institutional development of local governmentin a developing country: the case of Venezuela. Birming-ham: University of Birmingham; 1998.
(29). McGill R. Institutional development. A third world citymanagement perspective. Basingstoke: McMillan; 1996.
(30). Paul S. Institutional development in the world bank pro-jects: a cross-sectoral review. En: Montiel L. Op. cit.
(31). Banco Mundial. Reflections from the participation sour-cebook. Washington, D.C.: Banco Mundial; 1996. [Sitioen internet]: disponible en: http://www-esd.worldbank.org/html/esd/env/publicat/dnotes/dn400296.htm Consul-tado: 14 de agosto del 2002.
(32). Álvarez SE, Dagnino E, Escobar A. Introduction: thecultural and political in Latin American social movements.Citado en: Morgan L. Community participation in health:perpetual allure, persistent challenge. Health Policy Plan.2001;16(3):221-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/16.3.221
(33). Kahssay HM, Oakley P. Community involvement in healthdevelopment: a review of the concept and practice. Gi-nebra: OMS; 1999.
(34). Muller F. Pobreza, participación y salud: casos latinoamericanos. Medellín: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia;1991.
(35). Banco Mundial. Local government capacity in Colom-bia: beyond technical assistance. Washington, D.C.: Ban-co Mundial; 1995.
(36). Angell A, Lowden P, Thorp R. Decentralizing develop-ment: the political economy of institutional change inColombia and Chile. Oxford: Oxford University; 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199242313.001.0001
(37). Vargas JE. Descentralización de los servicios de salud enColombia. Rev Planeac Desarro 1997;28(1):20-45.
(38). Bossert TJ, Chawla M, Bowser, et al. Applied researchon decentralization of health systems in Latin America:Colombia case study. Washington, D.C.: USAID; 2000.[Sitio en internet]. Disponible en: www.hsph.harvard.edu/ihsg/ publications/pdf/lac/colombia-dec.PDF. Consultado:octubre de 2005.
(39). Colombia. Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP),Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo(PNUD). Informe de desarrollo humano para Colombia.Bogotá: DNP/PNUD; 1999.
(40). La Forgia GM, Homedes N. Decentralizing health servi-ces in Colombia. A review of progress and problems. Was-hington, D.C.: Banco Mundial; 1992.
(41). Colombia. Superintendencia Nacional de Salud. Recur-sos humanos de salud en Colombia. Bogotá: Ministeriode Salud; 1996.
(42). Forero C, Hidalgo C, Jiménez G, Ortiz M, Pulido S. Des-centralización y participación ciudadana. Bogotá: TercerMundo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Facultad deCiencias Económicas; 1997.
(43). Mosquera M, Zapata Y, Lee K, Arango C, Varela A.Strengthening user participation through health sectorreform in Colombia: a study of institutional change andsocial representation. Health Policy Plan 2001;16(Suppl2):52-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/16.suppl_2.52
(44). Cardona A, Arbeláez P, Chávez B, et al.. Impacto de lareforma de seguridad social sobre la organización institucional y la prestación de servicios de salud en Colombia. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública 1999;16(2):9-29.
(45). Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. Municipio centinela: eva-luación de la implementación del Sistema General de Seguridad en Salud, 1997-1999. Bogotá: El Ministerio;2001.
(46). Céspedes JE, Martínez R, Olaya S., et al. Reforma de laseguridad social en salud en Colombia y efectos sobre laequidad en el acceso y la utilización de servicios de salud.Rev Salud Pública 2000;2(2):145-164.
(47). Castaño RA, Arbeláez JJ, Giedion U, Morales LG Evo-lución de la equidad en el sistema colombiano de salud.Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas, CEPAL – ECLAC;2001. (Serie Financiamiento del Desarrollo, No. 108).
(48). Silva L, Herrera V, Agudelo C. Promoción, prevención,municipalización y aseguramiento en salud en siete mu-nicipios. Rev Salud Pública 2002;4:36-58.
(49). Hair JF, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W. Análisis mul-tivariante. 5th ed. Madrid: Prentice Hall; 1999.
(50). Malhotra NK. Investigación de mercados: un enfoquepráctico. 2ª ed. México: Prentice-Hall Hispanoamerica-na; 1997.
(51). Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied multivariate statisti-cal analysis. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1992.
(52). Malhotra NK. Marketing research: an applied orientation.2nd ed. Londres: Prentice-Hall; 1996.
(53). Yepes F, Sánchez LH. La descentralización de salud enColombia. Estudio de casos y controles. Bogotá: Asociación Colombiana de la Salud (ASSALUD); 2002.
(54). Banco Mundial, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.Descentralización en Colombia. Nuevos Desafíos. RE3-98-002. Washington , DC: Banco Mundial; 1998.
(55). Collins CD, Omar M, Tarin E. Decentralization, healthcare and policy process in the Punjab, Pakistan in the1990s. Int J Health Plann Manage 2002;17(2):123-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.657
(56). Bossert T, Larrañaga O, Ruiz F. Decentralization of heal-th systems in Latin America. Rev Panam Salud Pública2000;8(1-2): 84-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892000000700011
(57). Gershberg AI. Decentralization, recentralization and per-formance accountability: building an operationally use-ful framework for analysis. Dev Policy Rev1998;16: 405-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00071
(58). Ferrelli R, Serrano CR, Balladelli PP, Cortinois A, Quin-tero J. Strengthening local health care management in Bo-livian districts through participatory operational resear-ch. Int J Health Plann Manage 1997;12(1) 29-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199701)12:1<29::AID-HPM452>3.0.CO;2-R
(59). Christiansen T. Summary of the SWOT panel’s evalua-tion of the organization and financing of the Danish heal-th care services. Health Policy 2002;59(2):173-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00206-8
(60). Vélez IM. Detectan 3 millones de ‘colados’ en el Sisben.Periódico El Colombiano, Enero 11 de 2003.
(61). Ramiro L, Castillo F, Tan-Torres T, Torres C, Tayan, J,Talampas R, Hawken L. Community participation in lo-cal health boards in a decentralized settings: cases fromthe Philippines. Health Policy Plan 2001;16(Suppl.2):61-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/16.suppl_2.61
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gloria Molina, Nilton E. Montoya, Claudia M. Rodriguez, Peter Spurgeon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
