The old sge pension based in deficiencyin Colombian legislation and the restrictions to access to it due to its assessment tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.5250Keywords:
general system of pensions, old age, handicap, disability, handicap scaleAbstract
In the pension system, through Act 797 of 2003, it devoted special old-age pension for the purpose of protecting people with 50% or more of physical, mental or sensory impairment, from 55 years of age 1000 weeks and prove listed at any time. Although the standard was in place, its consecration is not widespread and is treated as a disability pension in addition to understanding the gap, meets the disability and handicap, that is equated in practice the concepts of impairment and disability. The barriers in the application of the rule, focus from the instrument to assess these criteria, called the Unified Rating Manual, which is not according to the updating of international standards which were the basis for elaboration, ie, those specified by the International Health Organization, making more difficult the assessment of the deficiency as an independent criterion for economic provision of old age controversy involving both doctors, lawyers and members of the regime as necessary to encourage reform or propose a new instrument qualification in the Social Security System of Colombia.
Downloads
References
(1). Colombia. El Congreso de la República. Ley 100 de 1993, diciembre 23, por la cual se crea el sistema de seguridad social integral y se dictan otras disposiciones. Bogotá: El congreso; 1993.
(2). Colombia. Congreso de la República. Ley 797 de 2003, enero 29, por la cual se reforman algunas disposiciones del sistema general de pensiones previsto en la Ley 100 de 1993 y se adoptan disposiciones sobre los Regímenes Pensionales exceptuados y especiales. Bogotá: El Congreso; 2003.
(3). Uthoff A. Brechas del estado de bienestar y reformas a los sistemas de pensiones en América Latina. [revista en internet] 2006 agosto. [Acceso 10 de octubre de 2009]; 89(29). Disponible en: http://white.oit.org.pe/ssos/documentos/brechas_estado_bienestar_al_n89.pdf.
(4). Instituto de Seguro Social. Medicina laboral [Internet] [acceso 5 de mayo de 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.iss.gov.co/portal/index.jsp?cargaHome=3&id_categoria=104&id_subcategoria=315.
(5). Díaz C. El papel del Médico especialista en medicina física y rehabilitación en la valoración de la discapacidad, del daño corporal y de la deficiencia. Rev. Rehabilitación 2008; 42(6): 265-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7120(08)75661-5
(6). Rodríguez M. Manual del Perito Médico: Fundamentos técnicos y jurídicos. Madrid: Díaz de Santo, 2000. p. 47.
(7). Rodríguez M. Manual del Perito Médico: Fundamentos técnicos y jurídicos. Madrid: Díaz de Santo, 2000. p. 153.
(8). Colombia. Presidencia de la República. decreto 917 de 1999, mayo 28, Por el cual se modifica el decreto 692 de 1995. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud, Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social; 1999.
(9). Colombia. Congreso de la República. Ley 962 de 2005, julio 8, por la cual se dictan disposiciones sobre racionalización de trámites y procedimientos administrativos de los organismos y entidades del Estado y de los particulares que ejercen funciones públicas o prestan servicios públicos. Bogotá: El Congreso; 2005.
(10). Egea C, Sarabia A. Experiencias de aplicación en España de la clasificación internacional de deficiencias, discapacidades y minusvalías. Madrid: Real Patronato sobre Discapacidad; 2001. Pág. 15.
(11). Jiménez M, González P, Martin J. La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento, de la discapacidad y de la salud (cif). Revista Especializada Salud Publica 2002: 76: 271-279.
(12). Egea C, Sarabia A. Clasificaciones de la oms sobre la discapacidad [Internet] 2001 [Acceso 2 de abril de 2010]. Disponible en: http://usuarios.discapnet.es/disweb2000/art/ClasificacionesOMSDisca-pacidad.pdf.
(13). Alcaldía de Manizales, Secretaría de Salud. (1991) Clasificación internacional de Deficiencias, Discapacidades y Minusvalía. Ma-nizales: Alcaldía de Manizales; 1991. Pág. 57.
(14). García J, Ramos M, González M. Análisis de la discapacidad y la minusvalía en rehabilitación según la Clasificación Internacional de Deficiencia, Discapacidad y Minusvalía. Revista Rehabilitación 2004: 38(4): 151-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7120(04)73450-7
(15). Guido H. Derechos de las personas con afecciones mentales. Revista Dehuidela 2002: 06: 10-11.
(16). Hernández M, Rodríguez G, Gerona P. La discapacidad en España: Equipos de valoración y orientación (evo). Prestaciones. Valoración de la discapacidad por disfunción del sistema musculoesquelético y nervioso. Revista Rehabilitación 2008: 42: 276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7120(08)75663-9
(17). Gómez M. Reflexiones sobre la discapacidad. Revista Alternativas: espacio pedagógico 1998: 13: 89-118.
(18). Herrera S, Vásquez B, Gaite L. La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento, de la discapacidad y de la salud. Revista Rehabilitación 2008: 42: 269-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7120(08)75662-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Natalia E. Gómez R., Sandra P. Duque Q., Patricia González S.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
