Use of complementary and alternative medicine and folk medicine in Medellín, 2005

Authors

  • Luz S. Alvarez C

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.87

Keywords:

complementary and alternative medicine, traditional medicine, qualitative research, health seeking behavior

Abstract

Objective: to explore health resources chosen by Medellín’s residents when they feel ill and the reasons why they decide to use Colombian folk medicine and Complementary and Alternative Medicine resources.
Methods: this research was based on the premises shared by the majority of the qualitative methods, and specially by two methodologies: the Grounded Theory (GT) and Rapid Assessment Process (RAP). Forty-six people from various social classes, who were affiliated with different health insurance companies as well as uninsured were interviewed. Interviews were carried out from July to September 2005. Results: the study found that many people, especially those with low or very low income seek Colombian folk medicine practices resources when they feel sick. These practices and their practitioners have taken new names to adapt themselves to new tendencies in medicine but they actually keep the traditional characteristics of Colombian folk medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapies such as acupuncture, homeopathy, and bioenergetics exercised by physicians licensed from certified universities are sought mostly by middle and upper class people, especially by those with a high educational level. These patients have in common that they feel discomfort with the biologist emphasis of Western medicine so they seek an integral treatment integrating body, mind, and spirit.
|Abstract
= 590 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 214 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1). Frohock MF. Alternative medicine, spiritual com-munities, and the state. Chicago: Chicago Universi-ty Press; 1992.

(2). Vila de Pineda P. Medicina tradicional en Colombia. En: Pinzón C, Roldan M. eds. V Congreso Nacio-nal de Antropología. Curanderismo. Bogotá, D. C.: Icfes. Instituto Colombiano de Antropología y Col-cultura; 1989.

(3). Estados Unidos. Institute of Medicine.Complementa-ry and Alternative Medicine in the United States. Was-hington, D. C.: The National Academic Press; 2005.

(4). Valero S. Algunos aspectos de la medicina bioe-nergética en Colombia, un estudio de antropología aplicada [tesis de maestría] Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia; 1995.

(5). Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Nueva York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

(6). Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.

(7). Scrimshaw S, Hurtado E. Rapid assessment proce-dures for nutrition and primary health care. Anthro-pological approaches to improving program effecti-veness. Los Angeles: The United Nations University, Unicef/United Nations Children’s Fund, UCLA Latin American Center; 1987.

(8). Scrimshaw NS, Gleason GR. Rapid Assessment procedures. Qualitative Methodologies for planning and evaluation of health related programs. Boston: International Nutrition Foundation for Developing Countries; 1992.

(9). Miles M, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1994.

(10). República de Colombia. Congreso de la República. Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Social en Salud. Ley 100 de 1993. Bogotá, D. C.: Congreso de la Re-pública, 1993.

(11). Fundación Corona, Fundación Antonio Restrepo Barco, Fundación Santa Fe, Universidad del Rosa-rio, Casa Editorial El Tiempo, Universidad de An-tioquia. Así vamos en salud. Cobertura del sistema nacional de salud. [Sitio en Internet]. [7 de Junio de 2006]Disponible en http://www.asivamosensalud.org/quienes/Default.htm

(12). Britten N. Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ. 1995; 311 (6999):251-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251

(13). Mruh T, Carvajal D, traductor. Atalas. ti 5.0 : the knowledge workbench. [Monografía en Internet] 2005 [7 de Junio de 2006] Berlín: Scientific Soft-ware Development; 1999 http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:J-fQpE--wFwJ:www.javeriana.edu.co/Facultades/Educacion/html/programa/maestria/I-07/material-clases/Intro-Taller-ATLAS.ti.pdf+atlas/ti+5.0&hl=es&ct=clnk&cd=7&gl=co

(14). Creswell JW. Research design qualitative, quantita-tive and mixed methods approach. 2a ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2003.

(15). Denzin NK. Sociological methods. A source book. 2a ed. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.

(16). Gutiérrez de Pineda V, Vila de Pineda P. La medi-cina tradicional en Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 1985.

(17). Iglesia Católica. Catecismo de la Iglesia Católica. [In-ternet]. [4 de Diciembre de 2005] Disponible en: http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism_sp/p3s2c1a1_sp.html

(18). Quevedo E. Historia social de la ciencia en Colom-bia: medicina. Bogotá: Colciencias; 1993.

(19). Quevedo E. De la higiene a la salud publica en Colombia la segunda mitad del siglo XX. En: Guerrero J, editor. Medicina y salud en la Historia de Colombia. Tunja: Asociación Colombiana de Historiadores, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia; 1997.

(20). Quevedo E, Duque C. Historia de la cátedra de me-dicina en Colombia 1653-1865. Bogota: Universi-dad del Rosario; 2002.

(21). Asociación de médicos investigadores en terapéu-ticas alternativas AMIT. [Sitio en Internet]. [4 de Diciembre de 2005] Disponible en: http://www.me-dalternativa.com/

(22). Vincent C, Furnham A. Why patients turn to com-plementary medicine? An empirical study. Br J Clin Psychol. 1996; 35(Pt 1):37-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01160.x

(23). Furnham A, Kirkcaldy B. The health beliefs and beha-vior of orthodox and complementary medicine clients. Br J Clinical Psychol. 1996; 35(Pt 1):35:49-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01161.x

(24). Berliner HS, Salmon JW. Holistic alternative to scientific medicine. Int J Health Serv. 1980;10(1):133-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/XWR6-5QPX-GEGE-5GWR

(25). Goldstein M. The emerging socioeconomic and po-litical support for alternative medicine in the United States. The Annals of American Academy of Politi-cal and Social Science 2002; 583(1): 44-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716202583001004

Published

2008-10-16

How to Cite

1.
Alvarez C LS. Use of complementary and alternative medicine and folk medicine in Medellín, 2005. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública [Internet]. 2008 Oct. 16 [cited 2025 Jan. 30];25(2):1-10. Available from: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/87

Issue

Section

Research