The Perception of Abortion: Voices from Physicians at Hospital de San Jose (Bogotá)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n1a08Keywords:
perception, legal abortion, voluntary interruption of pregnancy, physicians, qualitative researchAbstract
Downloads
References
(1). Organización de las Naciones Unidas. Resolución aprobada por la Asamblea General 55/2. Declaración del milenio. New York, 2000. p. 1-10.
(2). Center for Reproductive Rights. The world´s abortion laws 2011. United States. 2011. Disponible en: http://worldabortionlaws.com/map/. Consultado 17 de septiembre de 2013.
(3). Organización Mundial de la Salud. Norma técnica para la atención de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo (IVE). Bogotá, 2006. P: 1-44.
(4). Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-355 de 2006. Bogotá. 2006.
(5). Rodríguez MS, Martínez IM, Soto JL, Concheiro L, Muñoz JI. University students’ attitudes towards Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy. Legal Medicine 2012; 14:209-213.
(6). Medeiros R, Azevedo G, Oliveira EA, Araújo FA, Cavalcanti FJ, Araújo GL et al. Opinião de estudantes dos cursos de Direito e Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte sobre o aborto no Brasil. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2012; 34(1):16-21.
(7). Puri M, Lamichhane P, Harken T, Blum M, Harper CC, Darney PD, et al. “Sometimes they used to whisper in our ears”: health care workers’ perceptions of the effects of abortion legalization in Nepal. BMC Public Health 2012; 12(1):297-315.
(8). Harries J, Stinson K, Orner P. Health care providers’ attitude towards termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study in South Africa. BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 296-397.
(9). Wojnar D, Swanson K. Phenomenology: An Exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing. 2007; 25(3):172-180.
(10). Bonilla E, Castro P. Más allá del dilema de los métodos: La investigación en Ciencias Sociales. Bogotá: Grupo Editorial Norma; 2005.
(11). Polit D, Hungler B. Investigación científica en Ciencias de la Salud: principios y métodos. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2000.
(12). Krause M. La investigación cualitativa: Un campo de posibilidades y desafíos. Temas educ 1995; 7: 19-39.
(13). Bautista NP. Proceso de la investigación cualitativa. Epistemología, metodología y aplicaciones. Bogotá: Manual Moderno; 2011.
(14). Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Resolución 8430, por la cual se establecen las normas científicas y técnicas de la investigación en salud. Bogotá, 1993. P:1-19.
(15). Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-636 de 2011. Bogotá. 2011.
(16). Castiblanco L, Gómez L. La clase de religión en Bogotá: un acercamiento cualitativo a las prácticas y dinámicas de la clase. Monografía de pregrado. Facultad de Sociología- Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, 2008.
(17). Möller A, Öfverstedt S, Siwe K. Proud, not yet satisfied: the experiences of abortion service providers in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sexual & Reproductive Health care 2012; 3(4): 135-140.
(18). Freedman L, Landy U, Steinauer J. Obstetrician-gynecologist experiences with abortion training: physician insights from a qualitative study. Contraception 2010; 81(6):525-530.
(19). González D, Salinas AA. Los médicos en formación y el aborto: opinión de estudiantes de medicina en la Ciudad de México. Cad. Saúde Pública 1997;13(2): 227-236.
(20). La mesa por la vida y la salud de las Mujeres. El acceso al aborto seguro y su impacto en la salud de las Mujeres en Colombia. Bogotá, 2011. P: 1- 4.
(21). Szulik D, Gogna M, Petracci M, Ramos S, Romero M. Anticoncepción y aborto en Argentina: perspectivas de obstetras y ginecólogos. Salud pública Méx 2008; 50 (1): 32-39.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
