Prevalence and clinical impact of sensitization to latex and fruits in dentistry students at the University of Antioquia, and its relationship with allergy to fruits

Authors

  • Alejandro Echenique Manrique University of Antioquia
  • Ana María Celis Henao University of Antioquia
  • Jorge Mario Sánchez Caraballo University of Cartagena. University of Antioquia
  • Ricardo Cardona Villa University of Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.v28n2a03

Keywords:

allergy, fruits, health care students, hipersensitivity, latex

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence and clinical impact of sensitization to latex and to five tropical fruits (banana, avocado, kiwi, pineapple and passion fruit) in dentistry students.

Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study of 128 dentistry students at University of Antioquia in Medellín, Colombia. Information was collected by means of a questionnaire and skin prick tests with latex and fruits were done.

Results: All students reported having had contact with latex. Nine of them informed at least one episode of adverse reaction to contact with latex without proof of sensitization to it. Five reported at least one reaction with one of the fruits, but skin prick tests were negative. Four of the 14 students who reported gastrointestinal symptoms were sensitized to latex or to one of the tested fruits. Overall, latex sensitization rate was 3.1%.

Conclusion: This percentage of sensitization to latex is lower than that in other studies; this may be due to the expression of immune mechanisms other than IgE mediation. We failed to demonstrate a higher sensitization rate to latex as students advanced in their career. The association between gastrointestinal symptoms and sensitization to both fruit and latex is to be emphasized.

|Abstract
= 430 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 147 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alejandro Echenique Manrique, University of Antioquia

Medical specialist in Clinical Allergology at the University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Ana María Celis Henao, University of Antioquia

Resident Physician for the third year of the Postgraduate Program in Clinical Allergology, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Jorge Mario Sánchez Caraballo, University of Cartagena. University of Antioquia

Master in Immunology. Clinical Allergist. Institute of Immunological Research, University of Cartagena. Group of Clinical and Experimental Allergology, University of Antioquia. Foundation for the Development of Medical and Biological Sciences. Cartagena, Colombia.

Ricardo Cardona Villa, University of Antioquia

Master in Immunology. Clinical Allergy Specialist. Chief of Allergology Clinic of IPS Universitaria, University of Antioquia. Postgraduate Coordinator in Clinical Allergology of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín.

References

(1.) Taylor JS, Erkek E. Latex allergy: Diagnosis and management. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(4):289–301.

(2.) Bousquet J, Flahault A, Vandenplas O, Ameille J, Duron JJ, Pecquet C, et al. Natural rubber latex allergy among health care workers: A systematic review of the evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(2):447–54.

(3.) Tarlo SM, Sussman GL, Holness DL. Latex sensitivity in dental students and staff: A cross-sectional study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99(3):396–401.

(4.) Saary MJ, Kanani A, Alghadeer H, Holness DL, Tarlo SM. Changes in rates of natural rubber latex sensitivity among dental school students and staff members after changes in latex gloves. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109(1):131–5.

(5.) Heese A, Peters KP, Stahl J, Koch HU, Hornstein OP. Incidence and increase in type I allergies to rubber gloves in dental medicine students. Hautarzt. 1995;46(1):15–21.

(6.) Vangveeravong M, Sirikul J, Daengsuwan T. Latex allergy in dental students: a cross-sectional study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94 Suppl 3:S1–8.

(7.) Gawchik SM. Latex allergy. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011;78(5):759–72.

(8.) Cabañes N, Igea JM, de la Hoz B, Agustín P, Blanco C, Domínguez J, et al. Latex allergy: Position Paper. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2012;22(5):313–30; quiz follow 330.

(9.) Blanco C. Latex-fruit syndrome. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2003;3(1):47–53.

(10.) Bousquet J, Heinzerling L, Bachert C, Papadopoulos NG, Bousquet PJ, Burney PG, et al. Practical guide to skin prick tests in allergy to aeroallergens. Allergy Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;67(1):18–24.

(11.) Garabrant DH, Schweitzer S. Epidemiology of latex sensitization and allergies in health care workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110(2 suppl):S82–95.

(12.) Jones KP, Rolf S, Stingl C, Edmunds D, Davies BH. Lon-gitudinal study of sensitization to natural rubber latex among dental school students using powder-free glo-ves. Ann Occup Hyg. 2004;48(5):455–7.

(13.) Hernández N, Villalta Y, Conde L. Frecuencia de aler-gia al látex en trabajadores del Hospital Militar Cen-tral de la ciudad de Bogotá en el año 2005. Revmed. 2007;15(1): 54-60.

(14.) LaMontagne AD, Radi S, Elder DS, Abramson MJ, Sim M. Primary prevention of latex related sensitisation and occupational asthma: a systematic review. Oc-cup Environ Med. 2006;63(5):359–64.

(15.) Madan I, Cullinan P, Ahmed SM. Occupational ma-nagement of type I latex allergy. OccupMed (Lond). 2013;63(6):395-404.

Published

2015-04-08

How to Cite

1.
Echenique Manrique A, Celis Henao AM, Sánchez Caraballo JM, Cardona Villa R. Prevalence and clinical impact of sensitization to latex and fruits in dentistry students at the University of Antioquia, and its relationship with allergy to fruits. Iatreia [Internet]. 2015 Apr. 8 [cited 2025 Apr. 3];28(2):128-36. Available from: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/iatreia/article/view/19107

Issue

Section

Original research

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>