Wireless devices in nursing education

Authors

  • Ana Belén Sánchez García RN, M.Sc., Professor. Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, España. email: absgarcia@ucam.edu.
  • Maria José López Montesinos RN, Ph.D., Professor. Universidad de Murcia, España. email: mjlopez@um.es.
  • José Luis Fernández Alemán Engineer, Ph.D., Professor. Universidad de Murcia, España. email: aleman@um.es.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.11681

Keywords:

Education, nursing; teaching materials; educational technology.

Abstract

Objective. This article sought to explore the adoption of wireless devices in university nursing teaching and address their repercussion on future professionals.

Methodology. This is a bibliographical study conducted in 2011, which analyzed international publications on the use, review, application, opinion, and experimentation of wireless devices in university nursing teaching of wireless technology in nursing teaching. The following databases were used: Medline and Science@Direct.

Results. A total of 503 articles were extracted and 77 were selected, of which 40 investigated the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), 13 the clicker (Student Response Wireless System), and six the smart phone. The use of mobile devices has experienced strong growth during the last five years, especially PDAs.

Conclusion. Use of mobile devices in university nursing teaching has grown in recent years, especially PDAs.

|Abstract
= 385 veces | RESUMEN | RESUMO
= 9 veces| | PDF (ENGLISH)
= 29 veces| | HTML (ENGLISH)
= 7 veces| | HTML (ESPAÑOL)
= 35 veces| | MCORREAHOYOS, C.V J.L.DOCX
= 0 veces| | MCORREAHOYOS, C.V A.B (1).DOCX
= 0 veces| | MCORREAHOYOS, CVM.JOSE.DOCX
= 0 veces| | MCORREAHOYOS, FORMATOCARTADERECHOSAUTORIA[1].DOC
= 0 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Rubió FS. Aprendizaje colaborativo en red: el caso del laboratorio de telemedicina. Gaceta Sanitaria. 2011; 25(3):254-6.

(2) Fernández Alemán JL, Carrillo de Gea JM, Rodríguez Mondéjar JJ. Effects of competitive computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of knowledge in medical surgical nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 31(8):866-71.

(3) Ainsley B, Brown A. The impact of informatics on nursing education: a review of the literature. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2009;40(5): 228-32.

(4) Brown M, Lees S, Clay C. Mobile midwifery education. Pract Midwife. 2010; 13(9):31-2.

(5) Dearnley C, Haigh J, Fairhall J. Using mobile technologies for assessment and learning in practice settings: a case study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2008; 8(3):197-204.

(6) Billings DM. From teaching to learning in a mobile, wireless world. J Nurs Educ. 2005;44(8):343.

(7) Hao ATH, Chang HK, Chong PP. Mobile learning for nursing education. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006; 943.

(8) Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62(10):1-34.

(9) Rosenstreich D, Wooliscroft B. Measuring the impact of accounting journals using Google Scholar and the g-index. Br Account Rev. 2009; 41(4):227-39.

(10) Garrett BM, Jackson C. A mobile clinical e-portfolio for nursing and medical students, using wireless personal digital assistants (PDAs). Nurse Education in Practice. 2006; 6(6):339-46.

(11) Bogossian FE, Kellett SEM, Mason B. The use of tablet pcs to access an electronic portfolio in the clinical setting: a pilot study using undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2009; 29(2):246-53.

(12) Gagne JCD. The impact of clickers in nursing education: A review of literature. Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31(8): 34-40.

(13) Patterson B, Kilpatrick J, Woebkenberg E. Evidence for teaching practice: the impact of clickers in a large classroom environment. Nurse Educ Today. 2010; 30(7):603-7.

(14) Wu PH, Hwang GJ, Tsai CC, Chen YC, Huang YM. A pilot study on conducting mobile learning activities for clinical nursing courses based on the repertory grid approach. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 31(8):e8-15.

(15) Broussard BB. To click or not to click: Learning to teach to the microwave generation. Nurse Educ Practice. 2012; 12(1):3-5.

(16) McLeod RP, Mays MZ. Back to the future: personal digital assistants in nursing education. Nurs Clin North Am. 2008;43(4): 583-92.

(17) Efstathiou N, Bailey C. Promoting active learning using audience response system in large bioscience classes. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(1): 91-5.

(18) Lee NJ, Cho E, Bakken S. Identification of hypertension management related errors in a personal digital assistant-based clinical log for nurses in advanced practice nurse training. Asian Nurs Res. 2010; 4(1):19-31.

(19) George LE, Davidson LJ, Serapiglia CP, Barla S, Thotakura A. Technology in nursing education: a study of PDA use by students. J Prof Nurs. 2010; 26(6):371-6.

(20) Young P, Moore E, Griffiths G, Raine R, Stewart R, Cownie M. et al. Help is just a text away: The use of short message service texting to provide an additional means of support for health care students during practice placements original research article. Nurse Educ Today. 2010; 30(2):118-23.

(21) Berglund M, Nilsson C, Révay P, Petersson G, NilssonG. Nurses' and nurse students' demands of functions and usability in a PDA. Int J Med Informatics. 2007; 76(7):530-7.

(22) Clay CA. Exploring the use of mobile technologies for the acquisition of clinical skills. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 31(6):582-6.

(23) Cornelius F, Gordon M. PDA connections: mobile technology for health care professionals. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

(24) Lee NJ, Bakken S. Development of a prototype personal digital assistant-decision support system for the management of adult obesity. Int J Med Informatics. 2007;76(Supplement 2):S281-92. Nurs Informatics 2006 Special Issue.

(25) Taylor PP. Use of handheld devices in critical care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2005; 17(1):45-50.

(26) DeBourgh GA. Use of classroom 'clickers' to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse Educ Pract. 2008; 8(2):76-87.

(27) Jones S, Henderson D, Sealover P. 'Clickers' in the classroom. Teach Learn Nurs. 2009; 4(1):2-5.

(28) Jensen R, Meyer L, Sternberger C. Three technological enhancements in nursing education: informatics instruction, personal response systems, and human patient simulation. Nurse Educ Pract. 2009; 9(2):86-90.

(29) Phillippi JC, Wyatt TH. Smartphones in nursing education. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011; 29(8):449-54.

(30) Russell JS, McWilliams M, Chasen L, Farley J. Using clickers for clinical reasoning and problem solving. Nurse Educ. 2011;36(1):13-5.

(31) Solecki S, Cornelius F, Draper J, Fisher K. Integrating clicker technology at nursing conferences: an innovative approach to research data collection. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010; 16(3):268-73.

(32) Mareno N, Bremner M, Emerson C. The use of audience response systems in nursing education: best practice guidelines. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010; 7(1):1-17.

(33) Filer D. Everyone's answering: using technology to increase classroom participation. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2010; 31(4):247-50.

(34) Skiba DJ. E-portfolios, webfolio, and e-dentity: promises and challenges. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005; 26(4):246-7.

(35) Johnston R, Hepworth J, Goldsmith M, Lacasse C. Use of iPod technology in medical-surgical nursing courses: effect on grades. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010; 7:1-17.

(36) Lymn J, Bowskill D. Learning on the move. Nurs Stand. 2010; 24(31):61.

(37) Zurmehly J. Personal digital assistants (PDAs): review and evaluation. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005;31(3): 179-82.

(38) Kuiper R. Metacognitive factors that impact student nurse use of point of care technology in clinical settings. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010; 7(1):1-15.

(39) Williams MG, Dittmer A. Textbooks on tap: using electronic books housed in handheld devices in nursing clinical courses. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009; 30(4):220-5.

(40) Newman C, Buckley T, Dunn S, Cashin A. Preferences for continuing education through existing electronic access for Australian nurse practitioners and its implication in prescribing potential. Collegian 2009;16(2): 79-83.

(41) Clark K, Colevins H, Bond D. Crossing the clinical chasm: from the backpack to the palm. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2009; 25(2):E14-8.

(42) Anonson J, Schweitzer K, Bassendowski S, Ralston A, Schweitzer K. Personal digital assistants in the classroom-and beyond: a collaborative initiative of the college of New Caledonia, British Columbia and the University of Saskatchewan. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2008; 22(2):48-51.

(43) Stroud SD, Smith CA, Erkel EA. Personal digital assistant use by nurse practitioners: a descriptive study. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009; 21(1):31-8.

(44) Koeniger-Donohue R. Handheld computers in nursing education: PDA pilot project. J Nurs Educ. 2008; 47(2):74-7.

(45) Trangenstein P, Weiner E, Gordon J, McNew R. Data mining results from an electronic clinical log for nurse practitioner students. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007; 129(Pt 2):1387-91.

(46) Greenfield S. Medication error reduction and the use of PDA technology. J Nurs Educ. 2007; 46(3):127-131.

(47) Newman K, Howse E. The impact of a PDA-assisted documentation tutorial on student nurses' attitudes. Comput Inform Nurs. 2007; 25(2):76-83; quiz 84-5.

(48) Bakken S, Jenkins M, Choi J, Hyun S, John R, Joyce M, et al. Usefulness of a personal digital assistant-based advanced practice nursing student clinical log: Faculty stakeholder exemplars. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006; 122:698-702.

(49) Dreher HM, Cornelius F, Draper J, Pitkar H, Manco J, Song IY.The fusion of gerontology and technology in nursing education: History and demonstration of the gerontological informatics reasoning project-grip. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006; 122:486-9.

(50) Tilghman J, Raley D, Conway JJ. Family nurse practitioner students utilization of personal digital assistants (PDAs): implications for practice. ABNF J. 2006; 17(3):115-7.

(51) Scollin P, Callahan J, Mehta A, García E. The PDA as a reference tool: libraries' role in enhancing nursing education. Comput Inform Nurs. 2006; 24(4):208-13.

(52) Altmann TK, Brady D. PDAs bring information competence to the point-of-care. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2005; 2(1):1-12.

(53) Davenport CB. Preparing text for PDA reading. Nurse Educ. 2005;30(5):193-4.

(54) White A, Allen P, Goodwin L, Breckinridge, D, Dowell, J, Garvy, R. Infusing PDA technology into nursing education. Nurse Educ. 2005; 30(4):150-4.

(55) Kneebone R, Nestel D, Ratnasothy J, Kidd J,Darzi A. The use of handheld computers in scenario-based procedural assessments. Med Teach. 2003; 25(6):632-42.

(56) Bakken S, Cook SS, Curtis L, Desjardins K, Hyun S, Jenkins M, et al. Promoting patient safety through informatics-based nursing education. Int J Med Inform. 2004; 73(7-8):581-9.

(57) Moore L, Richardson BR, Williams RW. The USU medical PDA initiative: the PDA as an educational tool. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002; 528-32.

(58) Brubaker CL, Ruthman J, Walloch JA. The usefulness of personal digital assistants (PDAs) to nursing students in the clinical setting: a pilot study. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009; 30(6):390-2.

(59) Farrell MJ, Rose L. Use of mobile handheld computers in clinical nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2008; 47(1):13-9.

(60) Fox CR, Day D, Griffin A, Huckstadt A. Capturing patient encounters during health care provider training using personal digital assistants. J Allied Health. 2007; 36(4):e326-52.

(61) McClunie-Trust P. Mobile computing in a New Zealand bachelor of nursing programme. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006; 122:605-8.

(62) Smith CM, Pattillo RE. PDAs in the nursing curriculum: providing data for internal funding. Nurse Educ. 2006; 31(3):101-2.

(63) Miller J, Shaw-Kokot JR, Arnold MS,Boggin T, Crowell KE, Allegri F, et al. A study of personal digital assistants to enhance undergraduate clinical nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2005; 44(1):19-26.

(64) Scordo KA, Yeager S, Young L. Use of personal digital assistants with acute care nurse practitioner students. AACN Clin Issues. 2003; 14(3):350-62.

(65) Cibulka NJ, Crane-Wider L. Introducing personal digital assistants to enhance nursing education in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs. J Nurs Educ. 2011; 50(2):115-8.

(66) Pilcher J, Bedford L. Podcasts, webcasts, sims, and more: new and innovative ways for nurses to learn. Neonatal Netw. 2010; 29(6):396-9.

(67) Long SR, Edwards PB. Podcasting: making waves in millennial education. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2010 ;26(3):96-101; quiz 102-3.

(68) Greenfield S. Podcasting: a new tool for student retention? J Nurs Educ. 2011;50(2):112-4

(69) MacKay B, Harding T. M-support: keeping in touch on placement in primary health care settings. Nurs Prax N Z. 2009; 25(2):30-40.

(70) Morris J, Maynard V. Pilot study to test the use of a mobile device in the clinical setting to access evidence-based practice resources. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2010; 7(4):205-13.

(71) Trangenstein PA. Electronic toolkit for nursing education. Nurs Clin North Am. 2008; 43(4):535-46.

(72) Maag M. Podcasting: An emerging technology in nursing education. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006; 122:835-6.

(73) Farrell M. Nursing and midwifery education using mobile technologies. Aust Nurs J. 2006; 14(1):25.

(74) Valaitis RK, O'Mara LM. Public health nurses' perceptions of mobile computing in a school program. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005; 23(3):153-60.

(75) Spurlock WR, Knighton E, Brown SC, Conner R. Providing care to a culturally diverse community: a mobile academic nursing center. Semin Nurse Manag. 1999; 7(4):183-7.

(76) DeBaca V. Mobile learning center-a creative teaching method. J Contin Educ Nurs. 1984; 15(4):139-40.

(77) Rollo J. A new approach to learning: the mobile teaching unit. Nurs Times. 1976; 72(36):suppl:130-2.

(78) Mertz CM. The use of the auto-tutorial laboratory and the mobile-tutorial unit in teaching nursing techniques at Delta College. How it really is. NLN Publ. 1970; (23-1411):48-50.

(79) Lange CM. The use of the auto-tutorial laboratory and the mobile-tutorial unit in teaching nursing techniques at Delta College. Concepts of the multisensory approach. NLN Publ. 1970; (23-1411):42-7.

(80) Folgueras LE. The use of the auto-tutorial laboratory and the mobile-tutorial unit in teaching nursing techniques at Delta College. Concepts and historical development. NLN Publ. 1970; (23-1411):39-41.

(81) Porter AG, Tousman S. Evaluating the effect of interactive audience response systems on the perceived learning experience of nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 2010; 49(9):523-7.

(82) Nichol D, Boyle J. Peer instruction versus classwide discussion in large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Stud Higher Educ. 2003; 28(4):457-73.

(83) MacArthur J, Jones L. A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms. Chemistry Educ Res Practice. 2008; 9:187-95.

(84) Guarascio-Howard L. Examination of wireless technology to improve nurse communication, response time to bed alarms, and patient safety. Health Environ Res Design J. 2011; 4(2):109-20.

(85) Dinh AK. Cloud computing 101. J AHIMA. 2011;82(4):36-7.

Published

2013-04-05

How to Cite

Sánchez García, A. B., López Montesinos, M. J., & Fernández Alemán, J. L. (2013). Wireless devices in nursing education. Investigación Y Educación En Enfermería, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.11681

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES / ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES / ARTIGOS ORIGINAIS

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.